- Ask questions
- Become member
- Create account
- Choose destination
- Go Abroad
- Live abroad
- Support the World
- Debates and discussions about right and wrong
- Fair and respectful travel and backpacking
- Personal competences for meaningful life
- Promoting tolerance and mutual understanding
- Protection of wildlife and the wonders of nature
- Recipes around the world and local food
- Recycling and fair shopping around the world
- Setting up international cooperation
- Sounds, texts and views of the world
- Sustainable development goals and missions
- Volunteering, saving nature and helping people
- World happiness and personal contentment
- Study Summaries
- Summaries for all studies
- Summaries for articles, books and exams
- Summaries for business and economics
- Summaries for health and medicine
- Summaries for International relations and studies
- Summaries for law and administration
- Summaries for marketing and communication
- Summaries for pedagogy and education
- Summaries for psychology and behavior
- Summaries for social studies
- Summaries for statistics and analysis
- Summaries for students in NL
- Search
- NL
- Aanmelden: en account gebruiken
- Reizen tot backpacken: in het buitenland
- Samenvattingen tot studiestof bestuderen
- Studeren tot stagelopen: in het buitenland
- Vertrekken tot emigreren: naar het buitenland
- Verzekeren tot visum regelen: in het buitenland
- Vrijwillig tot betaald werken: in het buitenland
- Log in
It seems that the overwhelming consensus is 'not to P' so why would we? Is there any benefit to using P-values to communicate these probabilities or are they just a hinderence?