Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Article summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- 2058 reads
Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>
“Mitchell & Tetlock (2017). Popularity as a poor proxy for utility.” - Article summary
Before the existence of the IAT, indirect measures of prejudice were developed in order to overcome response bias and psychologists began to examine automatic processes that may contribute to contemporary forms of prejudice. After the existence of the IAT, implicit prejudice became the same thing as widespread unconscious prejudices that are more difficult to spot and regularly infect intergroup interactions.
The IAT has been used throughout different areas of society and is a very popular mean of describing implicit prejudice. Prejudice extends beyond negative or positive associations with an attitude object to include motivational and affective reactions to in-group and out-group members. IAT does not have a strong predictive validity. The IAT score is a poor predictor of discriminating behaviour.
There are no guidelines for how to interpret the scores on the IAT. This is referred to as the score interpretation problem. The test scores are dependent on arbitrary thresholds and it is not possible to link them to behaviour outcomes.
The focus of the IAT on implicit gender stereotypes is (not implicit sexism) is problematic because implicit measures of gender stereotypes are not a good predictor of discriminatory behaviour (1), only a very limited set of implicit gender stereotypes has been examined (2) and no explanation is provided about how conflicts between automatic evaluative associations and automatic semantic associations are resolved (3).
Individuating information, getting personal information about a certain group, exerts effects to counter explicit biases. It does the same with regard to implicit biases.
Subjective evaluation criteria are not associated with discrimination. Therefore, the solution that only objective measures must be used in decision making to counter (implicit) bias is unnecessary. This is referred to as the subjective judgement problem.
Access:
Public
This content is related to:
Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Article summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Summary interim exam 3 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
Check more of this topic?
Search other summaries?
This content is used in:
Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Summary interim exam 3 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics by Andy Field, fifth edition – Summary chapter 6
- Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics by Andy Field, fifth edition – Summary chapter 8
- Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics by Andy Field, fifth edition – Summary chapter 9
- Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics by Andy Field, fifth edition – Summary chapter 11
- Foster (2010). Causal inference and developmental psychology.” – Article summary
- “Pearl (2018). Confounding and deconfounding: Or, slaying the lurking variable.” - Article summary
- “Shadish (2008). Critical thinking in quasi-experimentation.” - Article summary
- “Kievit et al. (2013). Simpson’s paradox in psychological science: A practical guide.” - Article summary
- Dienes (2008). Understanding psychology as a science.” – Article summary
- “Marewski & Olsson (2009). Formal modelling of psychological processes.” - Article summary
- “Dennis & Kintsch (2008). Evaluating theories.” - Article summary
- "Furr & Bacharach (2014). Estimating and evaluating convergent and discriminant validity evidence.” - Article summary
- “Furr & Bacharach (2014). Estimating practical effects: Binomial effect size display, Taylor-Russell tables, utility analysis and sensitivity / specificity.” – Article summary
- “Furr & Bacharach (2014). Scaling.” - Article summary
- “Mitchell & Tetlock (2017). Popularity as a poor proxy for utility.” - Article summary
- “LeBel & Peters (2011). Fearing the future of empirical psychology: Bem’s (2011) evidence of psi as a case study of deficiencies in modal research practice.” - Article summary
Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Article summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- Borsboom & Cramer (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology.
- Borsboom et al. (2016). Kinds versus continua: a review of psychometric approaches to uncover the structure of psychiatric constructs.
- "Cohen on item response theory” – Article summary
- Cohen on the science of psychological measurement” - Article summary
- Coyle (2015). Introduction to qualitative psychological research.” – Article summary
- Dienes (2008). Understanding psychology as a science.” – Article summary
- Dienes (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on?” – Article summary
- Eaton et al. (2014). Toward a model-based approach to the clinical assessment of personality psychopathology.” – Article summary
- Foster (2010). Causal inference and developmental psychology.” – Article summary
- “Furr & Bacharach (2014). Estimating practical effects: Binomial effect size display, Taylor-Russell tables, utility analysis and sensitivity / specificity.” – Article summary
- "Furr & Bacharach (2014). Estimating and evaluating convergent and discriminant validity evidence.” - Article summary
- “Furr & Bacharach (2014). Scaling.” - Article summary
- “Gigerenzer & Marewski (2015). Surrogate science: The idol of a universal method for scientific inference.” - Article summary
- “Halpern (2014). Thinking, an introduction.” - Article summary
- “Kievit et al. (2013). Simpson’s paradox in psychological science: A practical guide.” - Article summary
- “LeBel & Peters (2011). Fearing the future of empirical psychology: Bem’s (2011) evidence of psi as a case study of deficiencies in modal research practice.” - Article summary
- “Marewski & Olsson (2009). Formal modelling of psychological processes.” - Article summary
- “Meltzoff & Cooper (2018). Critical thinking about research: Psychology and related fields.” - Article summary
- “Mitchell & Tetlock (2017). Popularity as a poor proxy for utility.” - Article summary
- “Nosek, Spies, & Motyl (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability.” - Article summary
- “Pearl (2018). Confounding and deconfounding: Or, slaying the lurking variable.” - Article summary
- “Schmittmann et al. (2013). Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena.” - Article summary
- “Simmons, Nelson, & Simonsohn (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.” - Article summary
- “Shadish (2008). Critical thinking in quasi-experimentation.” - Article summary
- “Dennis & Kintsch (2008). Evaluating theories.” - Article summary
- “Van der Maas, Kan, & Borsboom (2014). Intelligence is what the intelligence test measures. Seriously.” – Article summary
- “Willingham (2007). Decision making an deductive reasoning.” – Article summary
This content is also used in .....
Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Summary interim exam 3 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains everything you need to know for the fifth interim exam for the course "Scientific & Statistical Reasoning" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains both articles, book chapters and lectures. It consists of the following materials:
...Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Article summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the summaries for the course "Scientific & Statistical Reasoning" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains the following articles:
- “Borsboom & Cramer (2013). Network analysis: An integrative
Work for WorldSupporter
JoHo can really use your help! Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world
Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org
Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams
- Check out: Register with JoHo WorldSupporter: starting page (EN)
- Check out: Aanmelden bij JoHo WorldSupporter - startpagina (NL)
How and why would you use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?
- For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
- For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
- For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
- For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
- For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.
Using and finding summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter
There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.
- Use the menu above every page to go to one of the main starting pages
- Starting pages: for some fields of study and some university curricula editors have created (start) magazines where customised selections of summaries are put together to smoothen navigation. When you have found a magazine of your likings, add that page to your favorites so you can easily go to that starting point directly from your profile during future visits. Below you will find some start magazines per field of study
- Use the topics and taxonomy terms
- The topics and taxonomy of the study and working fields gives you insight in the amount of summaries that are tagged by authors on specific subjects. This type of navigation can help find summaries that you could have missed when just using the search tools. Tags are organised per field of study and per study institution. Note: not all content is tagged thoroughly, so when this approach doesn't give the results you were looking for, please check the search tool as back up
- Check or follow your (study) organizations:
- by checking or using your study organizations you are likely to discover all relevant study materials.
- this option is only available trough partner organizations
- Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
- by following individual users, authors you are likely to discover more relevant study materials.
- Use the Search tools
- 'Quick & Easy'- not very elegant but the fastest way to find a specific summary of a book or study assistance with a specific course or subject.
- The search tool is also available at the bottom of most pages
Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?
- Check out: Why and how to add a WorldSupporter contributions
- JoHo members: JoHo WorldSupporter members can share content directly and have access to all content: Join JoHo and become a JoHo member
- Non-members: When you are not a member you do not have full access, but if you want to share your own content with others you can fill out the contact form
Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance
Field of study
- All studies for summaries, study assistance and working fields
- Communication & Media sciences
- Corporate & Organizational Sciences
- Cultural Studies & Humanities
- Economy & Economical sciences
- Education & Pedagogic Sciences
- Health & Medical Sciences
- IT & Exact sciences
- Law & Justice
- Nature & Environmental Sciences
- Psychology & Behavioral Sciences
- Public Administration & Social Sciences
- Science & Research
- Technical Sciences
Check the related and most recent topics and summaries:
Activity abroad, study field of working area:
Institutions, jobs and organizations:
Add new contribution