“Shadish (2008). Critical thinking in quasi-experimentation.” - Article summary

A common element in all experiments is the deliberate manipulation of an assumed cause followed by an observation of the effects that follow. A quasi-experiment is an experiment that does not uses random assignment of participants to conditions.

An inus condition is an insufficient but non-redundant part of an unnecessary but sufficient condition. It is insufficient, because in itself it cannot be the cause, but it is also non-redundant as it adds something that is unique to the cause. It is an insufficient cause.

Most causal relationships are non-deterministic. They do not guarantee that an effect occur, as most causes are inus conditions, but they increase the probability that an effect will occur. To different degrees, all causal relationships are contextually dependent.

A counterfactual is something that is contrary to fact. An effect is the difference between what did happen and what would have happened. The counterfactual cannot be observed. Researchers try to approximate the counterfactual, but it is impossible to truly observe it.

Two central tasks of experimental design are creating a high-quality but imperfect source of counterfactual and understanding how this source differs from the experimental condition.

Creating a good source of counterfactual is problematic in quasi-experiments. There are two tools to attempt this:

  1. Observe the same unit over time
  2. Make the non-random control groups as similar as possible to the treatment group

A causal relationship exists if the cause preceded the effect (1), the cause was related to the effect (2) and there is no plausible alternative explanation for the effect other than the cause (3). Although quasi-experiments are flawed compared to experimental studies, they improve on correlational studies in two ways:

  1. Quasi-experiments make sure the cause precedes the effect by first manipulating the presumed cause and then observing an outcome afterwards.
  2. Quasi-experiments allows to control for some third-variable explanations. 

Campbell’s threats to valid causal inference contains a list of common group differences in a general system of threats to valid causal inference:

  1. History
    Events occurring concurrently with treatment could cause worse performance.
  2. Maturation
    Naturally occurring changes over time, not too be confused with treatment effects.
  3. Selection
    Systematic differences over conditions in respondent characteristics.
  4. Attrition
    A loss of participants can produce artificial effects if that loss is systematically correlated with conditions.
  5. Instrumentation
    The instruments of measurement might differ or change over time.
  6. Testing
    Exposure to a test can affect subsequent scores on a test.
  7. Regression to the mean
    An extreme observation will be less extreme on the second observation.

Two flaws of falsification are that it requires a causal claim to be clear, complete and agreed upon in all its details and it requires observational procedures to perfectly reflect the theory that is being tested.

Image

Access: 
Public

Image

Join WorldSupporter!
This content is used in:

Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Summary interim exam 3 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)

Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Article summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)

Search a summary

Image

 

 

Contributions: posts

Help other WorldSupporters with additions, improvements and tips

Add new contribution

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Image

Spotlight: topics

Check the related and most recent topics and summaries:
Institutions, jobs and organizations:
Activities abroad, study fields and working areas:
This content is also used in .....

Image

Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org

Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams

How and why use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?

  • For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
  • For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
  • For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
  • For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
  • For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.

Using and finding summaries, notes and practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter

There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.

  1. Use the summaries home pages for your study or field of study
  2. Use the check and search pages for summaries and study aids by field of study, subject or faculty
  3. Use and follow your (study) organization
    • by using your own student organization as a starting point, and continuing to follow it, easily discover which study materials are relevant to you
    • this option is only available through partner organizations
  4. Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
  5. Use the menu above each page to go to the main theme pages for summaries
    • Theme pages can be found for international studies as well as Dutch studies

Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?

Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance

Main summaries home pages:

Main study fields:

Main study fields NL:

Follow the author: JesperN
Work for WorldSupporter

Image

JoHo can really use your help!  Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world

Working for JoHo as a student in Leyden

Parttime werken voor JoHo

Statistics
2633