Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Interim exam 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- 1485 keer gelezen
Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>
“Balon & Clayton (2014). Female sexual interest/arousal disorder: A diagnosis out of thin air.” – Article summary
In psychiatric illness, the criteria for establishing diagnostic validity are clinical description (1), laboratory studies (2), exclusion of or delineation from other disorders (3), a follow-up study (4) and a family study (5). These criteria are typically not fulfilled or psychiatric illnesses.
According to Balon and Clayton, the primary reason for the creation of the female sexual interest/arousal disorder (FSAID) was to get rid of the linear concept of the sexual response cycle in women and replace it with a circular model of sexual response. However, no diagnosis has been presented for this diagnosis. There are several things wrong with this diagnosis:
- There is no scientific study which supports the separations of gender in regards to desire and arousal that demonstrates that the FSIAD diagnosis more accurately reflects the sexual experience of women compared to the DSM-IV diagnoses.
- There is no information regarding whether the criteria of FSIAD are useful to clinicians.
- There is a lack of continuity with the DSM-IV.
- The concept of female sexual arousal in the DSM-V is unclear (e.g. lubrication is not used in the diagnostic criteria).
- The evidence supporting the inclusion of genital or non-genital sensations with disordered desire is not presented.
- The diagnosis of FSIAD could be made without any impairment of arousal (e.g. three criteria are unrelated to arousal and are sufficient for a diagnosis).
- The terms sexual excitement and pleasure are seen as the same although no definition is provided and there is no relationship provided with either arousal or desire.
- There is no broad consensus or expert clinical opinion supporting the establishment of the diagnosis.
- Genetic evidence supporting FSIAD is lacking while there is genetic evidence that argues against the diagnosis (e.g. genetic sharing between arousal, lubrication and orgasm).
- The reliability of the FSIAD criteria is unclear.
- The validity of the FSIAD criteria is questionable because of the lack of genetic evidence (1), symptom criteria not related to arousal (2) and lack of any study of this disorder (3).
- There is no indication of what treatment should be used.
- There is no evidence regarding the existence of the combined disorder (i.e. underlying pathology).
- There is not an unmet need which is served by the creation of FSIAD.
According to Balon and Clayton, the establishment of this diagnosis has the potential to inflict harm by excluding women who currently have an ‘old’ diagnosis (HSDD) and it is not clear what will happen with regard to treatment.
Access:
Public
This content is related to:
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Interim exam 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Full course summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Article overview (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
Check more of this topic?
This content is used in:
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Interim exam 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender.” – Article summary
- “Hyde & Delamater (2017). Gender roles and stereotypes.” – Article summary
- “Petersen & Hyde (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993 – 2007.” – Article summary
- “Vanwesenbeeck (2009). Doing gender in sex and sex research.” – Article summary
- “Cretella, Rosik, & Howsepian (2019). Sex and gender are distinct variables critical to health: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019).” – Article summary
- “Davy (2015). The DSM-5 and the politics of diagnosing transpeople.” – Article summary
- “Hyde et al. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary.” – Article summary
- “Kuyper & Wijsen (2013). Gender identities and gender dysphoria in the Netherlands.” – Article summary
- “Reilly (2019). Gender can be a continuous variable, not just a categorical one: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019). – Article summary
- “Zucker et al. (2013). Memo outlining evidence for change for gender identity disorder in the DSM-5.” – Article summary
- “Althof et al. (2017). Opinion paper: On the diagnosis/classification of sexual arousal concerns in women.” – Article summary
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 2 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Balon & Clayton (2014). Female sexual interest/arousal disorder: A diagnosis out of thin air.” – Article summary
- “Basson (2014). On the definition of female sexual interest/arousal disorder.” – Article summary
- “Graham, Boyton, & Gould (2017). Challenging narratives of ‘dysfunction’. “ – Article summary
- “Graham, Brotto, & Zucker (2014). Response to Balon and Clayton (2014): Female sexual interest/arousal disorder is a diagnosis more on firm ground than thin air.” – Article summary
- “Hyde (2019). Kinds of sexual disorders.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Explaining desire: Multiple perspectives.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Arousal.” – Article summary
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Full course summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender.” – Article summary
- “Hyde & Delamater (2017). Gender roles and stereotypes.” – Article summary
- “Petersen & Hyde (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993 – 2007.” – Article summary
- “Vanwesenbeeck (2009). Doing gender in sex and sex research.” – Article summary
- “Cretella, Rosik, & Howsepian (2019). Sex and gender are distinct variables critical to health: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019).” – Article summary
- “Davy (2015). The DSM-5 and the politics of diagnosing transpeople.” – Article summary
- “Hyde et al. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary.” – Article summary
- “Kuyper & Wijsen (2013). Gender identities and gender dysphoria in the Netherlands.” – Article summary
- “Reilly (2019). Gender can be a continuous variable, not just a categorical one: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019). – Article summary
- “Zucker et al. (2013). Memo outlining evidence for change for gender identity disorder in the DSM-5.” – Article summary
- “Althof et al. (2017). Opinion paper: On the diagnosis/classification of sexual arousal concerns in women.” – Article summary
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 2 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Balon & Clayton (2014). Female sexual interest/arousal disorder: A diagnosis out of thin air.” – Article summary
- “Basson (2014). On the definition of female sexual interest/arousal disorder.” – Article summary
- “Graham, Boyton, & Gould (2017). Challenging narratives of ‘dysfunction’. “ – Article summary
- “Graham, Brotto, & Zucker (2014). Response to Balon and Clayton (2014): Female sexual interest/arousal disorder is a diagnosis more on firm ground than thin air.” – Article summary
- “Hyde (2019). Kinds of sexual disorders.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Explaining desire: Multiple perspectives.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Arousal.” – Article summary
- “Brewin et al. (2009). Reformulating PTSD for DSM-V: Life after criterion A.” – Article summary
- “Cacioppo et al. (2015). Loneliness: Clinical import and interventions.” – Article summary
- “DiTomasso, Brannen-McNulty, Ross, & Burgess (2003). Attachment styles, social skills and loneliness in young adults.” – Article summary
- “DSM-5. Posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Ozer, Lipsey, & Weiss (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis.” – Article summary
- “Pincus & Gurtman (2006). Interpersonal theory and the interpersonal circumplex.” – Article summary
- “Schaver & Mikulincer (2011). An attachment-theory framework for conceptualizing interpersonal behaviour.” – Article summary
- “Ehlers & Clark (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Forest & Wood (2012). When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook.” – Article summary
- “Nadkarni & Hofmann (2012). Why do people use Facebook?” – Article summary
- “Van den Hout & Engelhard (2012). How does EMDR work?” – Article summary
- “Van Emmerik & Kamphuis (2015). Writing therapies for post-traumatic stress and post-traumatic stress disorder: A review of procedures and outcomes.” – Article summary
- “Watkins et al. (2018). Treating PTSD: A review of evidence-based psychotherapy interventions.” – Article summary
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Article overview (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender.” – Article summary
- “Hyde & Delamater (2017). Gender roles and stereotypes.” – Article summary
- “Petersen & Hyde (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993 – 2007.” – Article summary
- “Vanwesenbeeck (2009). Doing gender in sex and sex research.” – Article summary
- “Cretella, Rosik, & Howsepian (2019). Sex and gender are distinct variables critical to health: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019).” – Article summary
- “Davy (2015). The DSM-5 and the politics of diagnosing transpeople.” – Article summary
- “Hyde et al. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary.” – Article summary
- “Kuyper & Wijsen (2013). Gender identities and gender dysphoria in the Netherlands.” – Article summary
- “Reilly (2019). Gender can be a continuous variable, not just a categorical one: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019). – Article summary
- “Zucker et al. (2013). Memo outlining evidence for change for gender identity disorder in the DSM-5.” – Article summary
- “DSM-5. Posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Althof et al. (2017). Opinion paper: On the diagnosis/classification of sexual arousal concerns in women.” – Article summary
- “Balon & Clayton (2014). Female sexual interest/arousal disorder: A diagnosis out of thin air.” – Article summary
- “Basson (2014). On the definition of female sexual interest/arousal disorder.” – Article summary
- “Graham, Boyton, & Gould (2017). Challenging narratives of ‘dysfunction’. “ – Article summary
- “Graham, Brotto, & Zucker (2014). Response to Balon and Clayton (2014): Female sexual interest/arousal disorder is a diagnosis more on firm ground than thin air.” – Article summary
- “Hyde (2019). Kinds of sexual disorders.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Explaining desire: Multiple perspectives.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Arousal.” – Article summary
- “Brewin et al. (2009). Reformulating PTSD for DSM-V: Life after criterion A.” – Article summary
- “Cacioppo et al. (2015). Loneliness: Clinical import and interventions.” – Article summary
- “DiTomasso, Brannen-McNulty, Ross, & Burgess (2003). Attachment styles, social skills and loneliness in young adults.” – Article summary
- “DSM-5. Posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Ozer, Lipsey, & Weiss (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis.” – Article summary
- “Pincus & Gurtman (2006). Interpersonal theory and the interpersonal circumplex.” – Article summary
- “Schaver & Mikulincer (2011). An attachment-theory framework for conceptualizing interpersonal behaviour.” – Article summary
- “Ehlers & Clark (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Forest & Wood (2012). When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook.” – Article summary
- “Nadkarni & Hofmann (2012). Why do people use Facebook?” – Article summary
- “Van den Hout & Engelhard (2012). How does EMDR work?” – Article summary
- “Van Emmerik & Kamphuis (2015). Writing therapies for post-traumatic stress and post-traumatic stress disorder: A review of procedures and outcomes.” – Article summary
- “Watkins et al. (2018). Treating PTSD: A review of evidence-based psychotherapy interventions.” – Article summary
Search other summaries?
This content is also used in .....
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Interim exam 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the information needed for the first interim exam for the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains lecture information, information from the relevant books and all the articles. The following
...Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Full course summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the information needed for the for the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains lecture information, information from the relevant books and all the articles. The following is included:
...Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Article overview (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the articles included in the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. The following is included:
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding
Work for WorldSupporter
JoHo can really use your help! Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world
Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org
Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams
- Check out: Register with JoHo WorldSupporter: starting page (EN)
- Check out: Aanmelden bij JoHo WorldSupporter - startpagina (NL)
How and why would you use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?
- For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
- For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
- For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
- For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
- For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.
Using and finding summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter
There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.
- Use the menu above every page to go to one of the main starting pages
- Starting pages: for some fields of study and some university curricula editors have created (start) magazines where customised selections of summaries are put together to smoothen navigation. When you have found a magazine of your likings, add that page to your favorites so you can easily go to that starting point directly from your profile during future visits. Below you will find some start magazines per field of study
- Use the topics and taxonomy terms
- The topics and taxonomy of the study and working fields gives you insight in the amount of summaries that are tagged by authors on specific subjects. This type of navigation can help find summaries that you could have missed when just using the search tools. Tags are organised per field of study and per study institution. Note: not all content is tagged thoroughly, so when this approach doesn't give the results you were looking for, please check the search tool as back up
- Check or follow your (study) organizations:
- by checking or using your study organizations you are likely to discover all relevant study materials.
- this option is only available trough partner organizations
- Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
- by following individual users, authors you are likely to discover more relevant study materials.
- Use the Search tools
- 'Quick & Easy'- not very elegant but the fastest way to find a specific summary of a book or study assistance with a specific course or subject.
- The search tool is also available at the bottom of most pages
Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?
- Check out: Why and how to add a WorldSupporter contributions
- JoHo members: JoHo WorldSupporter members can share content directly and have access to all content: Join JoHo and become a JoHo member
- Non-members: When you are not a member you do not have full access, but if you want to share your own content with others you can fill out the contact form
Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance
Field of study
- All studies for summaries, study assistance and working fields
- Communication & Media sciences
- Corporate & Organizational Sciences
- Cultural Studies & Humanities
- Economy & Economical sciences
- Education & Pedagogic Sciences
- Health & Medical Sciences
- IT & Exact sciences
- Law & Justice
- Nature & Environmental Sciences
- Psychology & Behavioral Sciences
- Public Administration & Social Sciences
- Science & Research
- Technical Sciences
Check the related and most recent topics and summaries:
Activity abroad, study field of working area:
Institutions, jobs and organizations:
Add new contribution