“Nadkarni & Hofmann (2012). Why do people use Facebook?” – Article summary
Social networking sites (SNS) refer to internet-based services that give individuals three major capabilities:
- The ability to construct a public or semi-public profile.
- The ability to identify a list of other users with whom a connection is shared.
- The ability to view and track individual connections as well as those made by others.
The use of Facebook varies according to a user’s gender (1), ethnicity (2) and parental educational background (3). There are several characteristics of Facebook usage for people who score high on extraversion:
- They are more likely to use Facebook as a social tool but not as an alternative to social activities.
- They use social networking sites more.
- They show addictive tendencies when using social networking sites.
These characteristics may arise due to extraverted people’s need for a high level of stimulation and a large social network. Introverted people tend to transfer their socially inhibited behavioural style from offline to online. They have fewer Facebook friends but tend to spend more time on Facebook and have a more favourable attitude towards Facebook.
People who score high on neuroticism prefer the wall function and share more basic information. People who score low on neuroticism also share more basic information but not people with a moderate score. People with greater openness to experience use more features form the personal information section. People with high narcissism and low self-esteem tend to spend more time on Facebook. They are also more likely to post self-promotional photos enhanced by Photoshop.
The tendency to disclose and the need for popularity are predictors of information disclosure on Facebook. Facebook use is predicted by high levels of extraversion (1), neuroticism (2) and narcissism (3), low levels of self-esteem (4) and self-worth (5).
The dual-factor model of Facebook use states that Facebook use is primarily motivated by the need to belong and the need for self-presentation. The need to belong refers to the intrinsic drive to affiliate with others and gain social acceptance. The need for self-presentation refers to the continuous process of impression management.
Self-esteem and self-worth are closely associated with the need to belong. Self-esteem may play the role of monitoring one’s acceptability in the group (e.g. drop in self-esteem motivates steps to avoid rejection and improve standing of social hierarchy).
Exposure to information presented on one’s Facebook profile enhances self-esteem. This is especially the case when selectively self-presenting (e.g. editing information). Facebook use intensity reduces students’ perceived levels of loneliness. However, it is not clear whether Facebook use improves self-esteem as results are mixed.
Facebook use may facilitate relationship development and acceptance of peers. The association between Facebook use and self-esteem may be moderated by cultural and social factors. A general disconnection appears to motivate Facebook use and being connected appears to reward Facebook use.
The idealized-virtual identity hypothesis states that social media allows users to display their idealized rather than accurate self through their profile. However, profiles appear to portray real personality rather than solely enhanced personality. A Facebook impression appears to be an accurate predictor of offline impressions. Emotional stability cannot be accurately assessed by looking at a Facebook profile. It is also possible that Facebook selves are socially desirable and reflect the self one wishes to have. Social expressivity is the trait that creates a positive impression of both online and offline profiles.
Attractive friends on a Facebook profile create more positive impressions. Attractiveness is important in forming impressions about others. A low number of friends or a very high number of friends cast doubts about a user’s popularity and desirability. This is shaped and motivated by the need for self-presentation as this need guides users’ specific behaviours (e.g. profile photo choice).
Demographic and cultural values contribute to the need to belong. Personality factors (i.e. neuroticism, narcissism, shyness, self-esteem and self-worth) contribute to the need for self-presentation.
Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>
Concept of JoHo WorldSupporter
JoHo WorldSupporter mission and vision:
- JoHo wants to enable people and organizations to develop and work better together, and thereby contribute to a tolerant tolerant and sustainable world. Through physical and online platforms, it support personal development and promote international cooperation is encouraged.
JoHo concept:
- As a JoHo donor, member or insured, you provide support to the JoHo objectives. JoHo then supports you with tools, coaching and benefits in the areas of personal development and international activities.
- JoHo's core services include: study support, competence development, coaching and insurance mediation when departure abroad.
Join JoHo WorldSupporter!
for a modest and sustainable investment in yourself, and a valued contribution to what JoHo stands for
- 1507 keer gelezen
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Interim exam 2 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- “Brewin et al. (2009). Reformulating PTSD for DSM-V: Life after criterion A.” – Article summary
- “Cacioppo et al. (2015). Loneliness: Clinical import and interventions.” – Article summary
- “DiTomasso, Brannen-McNulty, Ross, & Burgess (2003). Attachment styles, social skills and loneliness in young adults.” – Article summary
- “DSM-5. Posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Ozer, Lipsey, & Weiss (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis.” – Article summary
- “Pincus & Gurtman (2006). Interpersonal theory and the interpersonal circumplex.” – Article summary
- “Schaver & Mikulincer (2011). An attachment-theory framework for conceptualizing interpersonal behaviour.” – Article summary
- “Ehlers & Clark (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Forest & Wood (2012). When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook.” – Article summary
- “Nadkarni & Hofmann (2012). Why do people use Facebook?” – Article summary
- “Van den Hout & Engelhard (2012). How does EMDR work?” – Article summary
- “Van Emmerik & Kamphuis (2015). Writing therapies for post-traumatic stress and post-traumatic stress disorder: A review of procedures and outcomes.” – Article summary
- “Watkins et al. (2018). Treating PTSD: A review of evidence-based psychotherapy interventions.” – Article summary
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Full course summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender.” – Article summary
- “Hyde & Delamater (2017). Gender roles and stereotypes.” – Article summary
- “Petersen & Hyde (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993 – 2007.” – Article summary
- “Vanwesenbeeck (2009). Doing gender in sex and sex research.” – Article summary
- “Cretella, Rosik, & Howsepian (2019). Sex and gender are distinct variables critical to health: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019).” – Article summary
- “Davy (2015). The DSM-5 and the politics of diagnosing transpeople.” – Article summary
- “Hyde et al. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary.” – Article summary
- “Kuyper & Wijsen (2013). Gender identities and gender dysphoria in the Netherlands.” – Article summary
- “Reilly (2019). Gender can be a continuous variable, not just a categorical one: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019). – Article summary
- “Zucker et al. (2013). Memo outlining evidence for change for gender identity disorder in the DSM-5.” – Article summary
- “Althof et al. (2017). Opinion paper: On the diagnosis/classification of sexual arousal concerns in women.” – Article summary
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 2 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Balon & Clayton (2014). Female sexual interest/arousal disorder: A diagnosis out of thin air.” – Article summary
- “Basson (2014). On the definition of female sexual interest/arousal disorder.” – Article summary
- “Graham, Boyton, & Gould (2017). Challenging narratives of ‘dysfunction’. “ – Article summary
- “Graham, Brotto, & Zucker (2014). Response to Balon and Clayton (2014): Female sexual interest/arousal disorder is a diagnosis more on firm ground than thin air.” – Article summary
- “Hyde (2019). Kinds of sexual disorders.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Explaining desire: Multiple perspectives.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Arousal.” – Article summary
- “Brewin et al. (2009). Reformulating PTSD for DSM-V: Life after criterion A.” – Article summary
- “Cacioppo et al. (2015). Loneliness: Clinical import and interventions.” – Article summary
- “DiTomasso, Brannen-McNulty, Ross, & Burgess (2003). Attachment styles, social skills and loneliness in young adults.” – Article summary
- “DSM-5. Posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Ozer, Lipsey, & Weiss (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis.” – Article summary
- “Pincus & Gurtman (2006). Interpersonal theory and the interpersonal circumplex.” – Article summary
- “Schaver & Mikulincer (2011). An attachment-theory framework for conceptualizing interpersonal behaviour.” – Article summary
- “Ehlers & Clark (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Forest & Wood (2012). When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook.” – Article summary
- “Nadkarni & Hofmann (2012). Why do people use Facebook?” – Article summary
- “Van den Hout & Engelhard (2012). How does EMDR work?” – Article summary
- “Van Emmerik & Kamphuis (2015). Writing therapies for post-traumatic stress and post-traumatic stress disorder: A review of procedures and outcomes.” – Article summary
- “Watkins et al. (2018). Treating PTSD: A review of evidence-based psychotherapy interventions.” – Article summary
Work for JoHo WorldSupporter?
Volunteering: WorldSupporter moderators and Summary Supporters
Volunteering: Share your summaries or study notes
Student jobs: Part-time work as study assistant in Leiden

Contributions: posts
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Interim exam 2 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the information needed for the second interim exam for the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains lecture information, information from the relevant books and all the articles. The following
...Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Full course summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the information needed for the for the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains lecture information, information from the relevant books and all the articles. The following is included:
...Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Article overview (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the articles included in the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. The following is included:
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding
Search only via club, country, goal, study, topic or sector











Add new contribution