Comparative Criminal Law Lecture 1
Comparative Criminal Law, Lecture 1 (2016/2017)
In this bundle you will find all the important lectures and working groups of the course Comparative Criminal Law (2016/2017), Utrecht University.
Comparative Criminal Law, Lecture 1 (2016/2017)
Comparative Criminal Law: Workgroup 1 (2016/2017)
According to Brants & Franken, the central issue determining whether a criminal process is (predominantly) inquisitorial or adversarial, is the conception of the ideal search for the truth (p. 6 literature reader). Weigend’s article also elaborates on the truth-finding in both systems.
Lecture 2 in the Course Comparative Criminal Law (2016/2017): Police & Interrogation
Summary of the Case Law Plonka v. Poland (Week 1), Comparative Criminal Law (2016/2017)
Summary of the Case Law: Salduz v. Turkey (Comparative Criminal Law, 2016/2017)
Access to a lawyer, breach of Article 6(3)(c) European Convention on Human Rights & Fundamental Freedoms
Summary of the Case Law: Miranda v. Arizona (Comparative Criminal Law 2016/2017).
Police interrogation and a breach of the right not to incriminate oneself.
Comparative Criminal Law (2016/2017): Case Law Summary: United States v. Russel
Add new contribution