Lecture notes with Experimental and Correlational Research at the Leiden University - 2018/2019

Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>

Lecture notes with Experimental and Correlational Research at the Leiden University - 2018/2019

Lecture 1

6/2/2019

-Correlation is about two variables being associated, but there is no evidence of causality. 

-Causality however requires multiple factors: covariance (variables have an association), directionality(cause precedes effect (in time)) and internal validity(eliminate alternative explanations).

- Correlations can be displayed in scatterplots that show:

       - Direction: positive or negative

       - Strength: density of the points

       - Shape: linear/nonlinear and homogeneous (one cluster) / heterogeneous (multiple clusters).                 

       - Outliers

-Covariance (sxy): to measure the degree to which two variables vary together.

            Formula:  sxy = Σ(xi-x)(yi-y) / N-1

It provides us with information on the strength and direction of the association. The disadvantage is that the covariance is dependent on the unit of measurement of the variables.

-Pearson r is a standardized measure that describes the linear relationship between two quantitative variables, and always lies between -1 and +1.

            Formulas:        r = sxy / sxsy            Alternative:     r = Σzxzy / N-1 

- Remember that a z-score is a standardized score that displays how many standard deviations a certain score is away from the mean.

 

Alternative correlational techniques:

- The Pearson r is the correlation coefficient that is most commonly used. There are alternatives:

quantitative + quantitative      --> Pearson r

ordinal + ordinal                     --> Spearman’s rho (rs)

dichotomous(only two possible values)+ quantitative --> point-biserial correlation (rpb)

dichotomous + dichotomous  --> phi coefficient (ϕ)

 

-Spearman’s rho  (rsdescribes relationship between two ordinal variables/ranked scores.

            Formulas: xrank = N + 1 / 2        srank =  (N(N+1) / 2)                             

           rs = r on ranked data

Spearman’s rho is also an alternative to Pearson r in case of outliers and/or weak non-linearity.

-Point-biserial correlation describes relationship between quantitative and dichotomous variables. We use the Pearson correlation formula to calculate rpb:    rpb = r

The sign of the correlation (+/-) depends on the way 0 and 1 are assigned to groups.   

            Relationship rpb and tindependent:     rpb = Square root of t2 / t2 + df         

-Phi-coefficient (ϕ) describes relationship between two dichotomous variables:     ϕ = r

There is also a specific formula to calculate ϕ when you make a 22 contingency table:  

       ϕ = √ (AD - BC / (A+B)(C+D)(A+C)(B+D) )       

Relationship ϕ and χ2:           ϕ = √(χ2 / N)               χ2= ϕ2 ✕ N

- Testing the significance of r, rs, rpb or ϕ:                t = r √ N-2 / √1-r2        with df = N - 2.

- Testing the difference between two independent r’s:     z = r'1 - r'2 / √ 1/N1-3 + 1/N2-3    

Important is to transform r to r’ first, according to Fisher's table.

 

- Statistical significance depends on N, r and α; so weak correlations in large samples can become significant and strong correlations in small samples might not be significant. So, testing only for significance is too limited.

- Measures of effect size: reffect, r2 (COD, VAF), Cohen’s d or Hedges’s g

- Correlation r is already an effect size; reffect

- The advantage of r2‘s (Coefficient Of Determination; COD, or Proportion of Variance Accounted For; VAF) is that we can compare them. But using r2 also has drawbacks.

- Cohen’s d and Hedges’s g are suitable for comparing the means of two groups (rpb).

            Cohen’s d: |μ1 - μ2 | / σ

            Hedges’s g: |x1 - x2| / sp            

The formulas were especially designed to leave out the size of N (~> comparison to t)

- Rules of thumb: 

                d/g           r              r2           rpb             r2pb

Small       0.20         0.10         0.01        0.10          0.01

Medium    0.50         0.30         0.09        0.24          0.06

Large       0.80         0.50         0.25        0.37          0.14


Lecture 2

13/2/2019

Simple linear regression:

- Correlations describe linear associations between two (interval) variables.

Regression enables you to estimate one interval variable from one or more others.

- In regression there is a clear distinction between the predictor variable (X) and the response/criterion variable (Y).

- 1 predictor variable --> simple linear regression

2 predictor variables --> multiple linear regression

- (Unstandardized) regression equation:        (^ indicates an estimation)

            b0= intercept/constant: predicted value of y when x = 0

            b1= slope: size of the difference in ywhen x increases by 1 unit            

- Error/residual (ei) = the difference between observed (yi) and predicted value (y^i)

Best fit of the data when Σeis minimized.

-b= ybar - b1xbar

b1= sxy / s2                = r * s/ sx

-Interpolation is making a prediction within the range of X and Y

Extrapolation is making a prediction outside the range of X and Y

- Problem; when the unit of measurement changes, regression equations change as well. So we use standardized regression equations:        zbary = rzx

 

Accuracy of prediction:

- How good is the model: Our data consist of explained data and some error/unexplained data. Best fit of the data when Σei is minimized

- Total variance:        SStotal / dftotal          Σ(yhat-ybar)2 / N-1  (N-1 are the degrees of freedom of y)

Model variance:        SSmodel/ dfmodel         Σ(yhat-ybar)2 / p     (p is the number of predictors)

Error variance:         SSerror / dferror          Σ(y-ybar)2 / N-2     (N-2 are the degrees of freedom of e)

- VAF = 1 - (SSerror / SStotal)    -->       SS= s2y* dftotal

For simple linear regression also holds:       VAF = r2

 

Significance testing:

- μy= β+ β1x  with variation σ

11.--> βis estimated with b0, β1is estimated with b1, σ is estimated with se.

- t =  b1 / SEb1              SEb1 = se /s√N-1                                - 

- Confidence interval for b1:  b1± t * SEb1, where t* is two-tailed critical t value with df=N-2

- If p < 0.05, X is a significant predictor of Y.

- Testing significance of two independent regression weights: (b1.1means b1 in sample 1)

t = b1.1 - b1.2 / sb1.1-b.1.2     df = n1+ n2– 4        sb1.1-b1.2 = √s2e.1 / s2x.1 (N1 - 1) + s2e.2/ s2x.2 (N2 - 1)             


Lecture 3

20/2/2019

- With multiple linear regressions, we have 1 response variable (y) and multiple predictor variables (x1, x2, et cetera). When we have more predictor variables, we will be able to estimate the response variable better and deal with less error variance. The multiple predictor variables do have to be related. 

- Regression equation sample:    y= b+ b1x+ b2x2    ... + bpxp          

Regression equation population: μ= β+ β1x1 + β2x2      ... + βpxp

- In multiple linear regression, the regression coefficient indicates the effect of x on y while controlling for the other predictor variables/keeping the other predictor variables constant.

- With two predictors, the relationship can be represented by a regression plane (a 3D scatterplot). The vertical distance from a point (y) to the plane ( is the error ei).

 

- Variances (mean squares):

-> Total variance:      MS= SS/ dfy            = Σ(yhat-ybar)2 / N-1  

Model variance:        MSyhat = SSyhat/ dfyhatl    = Σ(yhat-ybar)2 / p     

Error variance:         MSe = SSerror / dferror      = Σ(y-ybar)2 / N-2       

 

- VAF (Proportion Explained Variance): SSyhat / SSy          VAF = R2         

- R = the correlation between  and y, the multiple correlation coefficient.

R2= the proportion explained variance / VAF

R2adj = the estimate of proportion explained variance in the population; 

 

- Testing the regression model:

1)       H0: R2= 0                    Ha: R2> 0        

          H0: β1= β2= 0             Ha: at least one β≠ 0             

          H0: R = 0                     HaR > 0          (cannot be negative)

2) ANOVA F-test for regression: F (dfyhat, dfe) = MSyhat / MSe    with dfyhat = p   and dfe= N – p – 1

Notes: in simple regression F is equal to t2, but not in multiple regression. 

- F is a test statistic, like t or z. It looks at the ratio between unexplained and explained variance; the larger the test statistic, the smaller the p-value. F is always a positive value, since variances cannot be lower than 0.

3) Look up the F-value in the table to get a p-value.

4) Draw the statistical and substantive conclusion: If p < α, His rejected and the results of the regression indicate that the two predictors collectively explain the VAF.

- Adding up the VAF of two predictors through simple regression analysis gives an other value than the VAF of these predictors through multiple regression. This is because one predictor explains a part of the variance of the response variable that the other predictor does too

 

Semipartial correlation:

r0(1.2)= the correlation between y and part of x1that is independent of x2, so in other words the correlation between y and partly x1after correcting for the overlapping part with x2.

Semi-partial correlations in SPSS --> “Part correlations”

r0(1.2) = √ B / A+B+C+D

-Partial correlation:

r01.2= the correlation between y and part of x1that are both independent of x2:

r01.2 = √ B / A+B

- Testing the Multiple Regression Coefficient:

H0: βj= 0         Ha: βj≠ 0 / Ha: βj< 0

t = b/ SEbj     with dfe= N – p – 1                

--> Look up p-value in t-table and draw conclusions about the significance of predicting y for each of the predictor variables.

Confidence Interval for bj    b± t × SEbj

 

- Predict Y from X1and X2

Simple regression:     Response variable (Y) and predictor (X; one of both)

Multiple regression:    Response variable (Y) and predictors (Xand X2)

-Spurious relations can be the result of a relation between X1and X2if we’ve only dealt with the relation between X1and Y. Controlling for X2should eliminate this spurious effect. We do this by using a multiple regression analysis.


Lecture 4

28/2/2019

- Assumptions for regression analysis:           

     --> Linearity: There is a linear relation between the predictor variables and the              response variable.

   --> Homoscedasticity: The variance of the residuals is equal for each predicted value. In a scatterplot showing homoscedasticity, the point are randomly distributed around a horizontal line. For heteroscedasticity, the point cloud varies in width; isn’t concentrated around a horizontal line.

   --> Normality of the residuals: The residuals are normally distributed for every predicted value.

- When any of these assumptions are violated, the variable needs to be transformed. It this isn’t effective ~> restraint interpreting tests.

 

- With multicollinearity, two or more predictor variables are strongly intercorrelated (with an r higher than 0.70 or 0.80). Consequently, regression coefficients become unstable and standard errors increase. It is more difficult to find significant effects.

- Check:          Tolerance: 1 – R2(as high as possible)

                       Variance Inflation Factor (VIF): 1 / tolerance (as low as possible)

If the tolerance is much larger than 0.10, and the VIF is much smaller than 10, there is no multicollinearity.

- If multicollinearity does exist, a variable needs to be removed from the regression model or predictors need to be combined into a sum score/scale.

 

- Test whether there are outliers on your data:

            1) Distance: are the scores on Y much higher/lower than expected (look at the            standardized residuals; higher than |3| are outliers).

            2) Leverage: are there outliers on the predictors? (look at leverage values; 3(p+1) / N --> outlier on predicto

            3) Influence: how much does an observation influence the results? (values smaller than 1 on Cook’s Distance are not influential).

- Is there no apparent reason for your outliers? Do not remove them! Apparent reason for removing outliers can be that it’s about an impossible score (due to data entry errors) or that it’s about an observation than is very different (e.g. a male in a female sample by accident).

 

-Selection methods: 

Standard (Enter): All predictors are added simultaneously.

Stepwise: Predictors are added on the basis of their unique VAF

Hierarchical: Predictors are added in an order determined by the researcher.

 

-Confidence Interval (CI):            μ^ ± t* × SEμ^

with SEμ^se√1/N + (x-xbar)2 / (N-1)s2x

and t* from t table with df = N – p – 1

 

-Prediction Interval (PI):   y^ ± t* SEy^

with SEy^: se√1 + 1/N + (x-xbar)2 / (N-1)s2x

and t* from t table with df = N – p – 1 

 

- The predictor interval is always wider then the confidence interval. Intervals get wider as they get further away from the xbar.

 

-Mediation: When a predictor X indirectly affects the response Y.

Moderation: When the strength of the relation between X and Y depends on another variable.

 


Lecture 5

6/3/2019

- During this lecture, all the topics of the past lectures were reviewed.

New topics:

- During regression analysis, categorical variables can be included using dummy variables, which are dichotomous variables with 0 and 1. Advantages: look at differences between groups (means) and look for possible interaction.

- Testing interaction uses the same testing procedure as with testing two independent regression coefficients (see lecture 2).


Lecture 6

13/3/2019

- The problem of analysing multiple t-test to draw one conclusion is that the probability of Type I error increases (more about this effect will be explained in next week’s lecture), so we use Analysis OVariance (ANOVA).

- ANOVA hypotheses:          H0: μ1= μ2= ... μI

                                                                    Hα: NOT μ1= μ2= ... μI            

So what the ANOVA test does, is determining whether all the population means are equal or if there is a difference between at least two of them (= omnibus test).

- 1 categorical X variable --> One-way ANOVA

2 or more categorical X variables --> Factorial (or two-way) ANOVA

- The F-test compares differences between groups (explained) with differences within groups (unexplained).

- One-way ANOVA model:

            Data (total) = Fit (between) + Residual (within)

            yij = μ+ εij

            yij = μ + α + εij

In which i = condition, j = participant, αi  = effect parameter (= the effect of a certain condition compared to the grand mean); (μ– μ) 

 

- Parameters in One-way ANOVA:

            yij = μ+ εij

            yij = μ + α+ εij

- μ is estimated with ybar, μis estimated with ybari , αi  is estimated with α^ = ybari - ybar  and σ is estimated with sp.

 

- Assumptions of the ANOVA model:           

            1. Homogeneity of variances 

The variance of residuals is same in all populations: The rule of thumb is the largest sd / smallest sd < 2, or you can check the significance of Levene’s test.

            2. Normality of the residuals

The residuals are normally distributed within each group (mean 0 and standard deviation σ): Look at histogram or P-P / Q-Q-plot of the residuals.

            3. Independence

The residuals are independent: This should be guaranteed by the design of the study.

If the assumptions of homogeneity and/or normality are violated, you have to check the data set for error and outliers, or transform the Y variable or use a non-parametric test (Kruskal Wallis).

 

- Kruskal Wallis test hypotheses:

            H0: MR1= MR2= ... MRI

                   Hα: NOT MR1= MR2= ... MRI

 

- ANOVA table:

            Source           Sum of Squares       df        Mean Square                      F

            Groups           SSG                             dfG       SS/ dfG                     MS/ MSE

            Error               SSE                             dfE       SS/ dfE

            Total                SST                             dfT       SST/ dfT

 

The F-test looks at the ratio between explained (groups) and unexplained (error) variance:

F = MSG/ MSEwith dfGand dfE.

- SST= Σ (yij  )2                 (difference between individual scores and grand mean) 

            > with df: N – 1

SSG= Σ ni(yij  )2= Σ nα^   (differences between group means and grand mean)

           > with df: I – 1     (I is the number of conditions/groups)

SSE= Σ (yij i)2                       (difference between individual scores and group means)

                  with df: N – 1

- So: 

(Source: Lecture slides week 6, slide 17, Hemmo Smit, Leiden University)

- Note that SST= SSG+ SSE, dfT= dfG+ dfE; but MST≠ MSG+ MSE

- When p < α, the F test has showed that the groups are significantly different.

 

- Measures of effect size:     

VAF in ANOVA is denoted by η2 instead of R2                          η2= SSG/ SST                   

- η2 is based on sample statistics, but consequently overestimates the population value. Therefore we use ω^2:                                                                        ω^2= SSG– (dfG* MSE) / SST+ MSE

This value is always lower than η2.

- Conclusion: estimated that in our population the 'between groups-factors  explain ω^2 (percentage value) of the variance in Y.

- Rules of thumb for the effect size:       small: .01        medium: .06    large: .14


Lecture 7

20/3/2019

- Why we cannot use results of multiple t-test to compare more than two group means:

Type I error is rejecting H0when it was in fact correct. When we perform multiple t-tests, we get an increased type I error. 

-Familywise error: αfam = 1 – (1-α)c                    in which c = the number of comparisons.

- Solution: ANOVA F test; this compares all means simultaneously, so there is no increased type I error.

 

- ANOVA tests give us indications whether at least two group means differ significantly from each other. However, we don’t know which ones:

- To know which group means are significantly different from one another we can make:

            - A priori comparisons; contrasts (planned comparisons)

                       Contrasts are specified before the data is collected.

            - A posteriori comparisons; post-hoc comparisons

                       Additional test done after significant F-value is found to determine which                                     means are significantly different.

 

- Examples for a priori hypotheses:

            H0: (μ2) / 2 = μ3     Hα: (μ12) / 2 > μ3        (one-sided)

                  H0: μ1= μ2                  Hα: μ1≠ μ2                   (two-sided)

- To determine a priori contrasts we formulate linear contrasts (ψ): combination of population means. The goal is to compare (groups of) means.

            ψ = α1μ1+ α2μ2+ ... αkμk                         (αare contrast coefficients)

- These contrast coefficients are weights. Groups with positive coefficients are compared with groups with negative coefficients. Contrast coefficients can be multiplied, as long as it’s with the same value, so that: Σα= 0.

- Contrast can or cannot be orthogonal; independent. Criteria for being orthogonal:Σαi= 0, Σbi= 0, Σαibi= 0, and the number of comparisons: DFG = I – 1.

- t-test for contrasts:t = c / SEc       = Σα1xbari / s√Σα2i/ ni         with df = DFE = N – 1

c = sample contrast

SEc= standard error of sample contrast

sp= pooled standard deviation (equal to √MSE)

- For testing a significant ANOVA F-test is not required.

 

- Contrasts in SPSS: Analyze --> Compare Means --> One-way ANOVA --> Contrasts

Specify αis one by one (Coefficients --> Add). With “Next” it is possible to specify multiple contrasts. αis should always add up to zero (the Coefficient Total).

- Conclusion: when p < α, y did not significantly differ between group 1 and group 2. Or: when p < α, y significantly differed for group 1 compared to the other groups.

- Other contrasts in SPSS:    simple (first): each group is compared with the first group.

                                          simple (last): each group is compared with the last group.

                                          repeated: each group is compared with the next group.

                                          polynomial: look at trend in data (linear, cubic, et cetera).

 

-Bonferroni Correction: corrects for when testing multiple contrast leads to an increased probability of Type I error.

            α’ = α/c           (c = number of comparisons)

Compare the p value with this corrected α. Using the Bonferroni Correction does decrease the power.

 

-Post-hoc tests are additional test (pairwise comparisons) that are done when the F-test is significant, but no specific hypotheses were formulated.

- There are multiple different tests:

--> Bonferroni corrections are done for a priori tests (a more conservative method; so we loose more power):          α is adjusted by dividing it by the number of comparisons.

            m (m-1)  / 2     (m = the number of conditions)

--> Tukey corrections are done for post hoc tests. It essentially does the same thing as Bonferroni.

In SPSS: One Way ANOVA --> Contrasts --> Bonferroni / Tukey

- t** indicates a corrected t variable.


Lecture 8

27/3/2019

Factorial designs include multiple independent variables. 

- The outcome indicates the main effects; overall effect of each factor separately, and the interaction effects; the effect of one factor dependent upon the level of the other factor.

- Advantages of factorial designs: 

1. Improved generalizability; by controlling for a hidden variable

2. More efficient research; better than doing two separate experiments with same number of participants per condition.

3. Increased power; the second factor in the model leads to a smaller error variance.

4. Interaction; investigates the interaction between two variables.

 

- One-way model:      yij = μ+ α+ εij             

            where i = condition and j = participant.

- Factorial model:        yijk = μ + α+ β+ αβij + εijk      

            where i = condition factor A, j = condition factor B and k = participant

μ is estimated with ybar

μijis estimated with ybarij

αiis estimated with α^= ybari- ybar

βjis estimated with β^j= ybar- ybar

αβijis estimated with α^βij = ybarij – (ybar+ α^i+ β^j)

σ is estimated with sp

 

- (Checking) assumptions in factorial ANOVA:

            1) Homogeneity of variances; variances of residuals is the same in all populations:

                       largest sd / smallest sd < 2 or check Levene’s test.

            2) Normality of residuals; residuals are normally distributed within each group 

                       Check with the histogram or P-P/Q-Q plot of the residuals

            3) Independence of residuals

                       Is guaranteed by the design.

 

- ANOVA table: 

(Source: Lecture slides week 8, slide 11, Hemmo Smit, Leiden University)

- F-test looks at the ratio between explained effect and unexplained variance:

F = MSeffect/ MSE        with dfeffectand dfE

- SS (Corrected Total)           = SS (Corrected Model)         + SS(Error)

            SST                            = SSM                                    + SSE

 

- Effect size for factorial ANOVA:

            > Total VAF in sample:                      η2= SSM / SST

            > VAF by effect in sample:    η1= SSeffect/ SST

            η2partial= SSeffect/ (SSeffect + SSE)

            Rules of thumb:          0.01 = small    0.06 = medium            0.14 = large

            > Estimated VAF by effect in population:      ω^2= SSeffect – (dfeffect * MSE) / SST + MSE


                                                                                                

Image

Access: 
Public

Image

Image

 

 

Contributions: posts

Help other WorldSupporters with additions, improvements and tips

Workgroup notes Experimental and Correlational Research

Another 1st year student is uploading her workgroup notes for the same course, useful complementary material > Check out Emy's profile for her content! :)

Add new contribution

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Image

Spotlight: topics

Check the related and most recent topics and summaries:
Institutions, jobs and organizations:

Universiteit Leiden en studieverenigingen

Crossroads: term ref right 1: 
Samenvattingen voor psychologie in Leiden via Labyrint en JoHo
Samenvattingen voor pedagogiek in Leiden via Emile en JoHo
Samenvattingen voor rechten in Leiden
Activity abroad, study field of working area:
Countries and regions:

Image

Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org

Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams

How and why use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?

  • For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
  • For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
  • For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
  • For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
  • For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.

Using and finding summaries, notes and practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter

There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.

  1. Use the summaries home pages for your study or field of study
  2. Use the check and search pages for summaries and study aids by field of study, subject or faculty
  3. Use and follow your (study) organization
    • by using your own student organization as a starting point, and continuing to follow it, easily discover which study materials are relevant to you
    • this option is only available through partner organizations
  4. Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
  5. Use the menu above each page to go to the main theme pages for summaries
    • Theme pages can be found for international studies as well as Dutch studies

Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?

Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance

Main summaries home pages:

Main study fields:

Main study fields NL:

Follow the author: Noa
Work for WorldSupporter

Image

JoHo can really use your help!  Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world

Working for JoHo as a student in Leyden

Parttime werken voor JoHo

Statistics
2163 2 1 1