IBP Psychology and Science
Chapter 9: Theories as structures II: Research Programs
Introducing Lakatos:
- Although an avid supporter of Popper’s approach to science, Lakatos came to realise some of the difficulties that faced Popper’s falsificationism
- Like Kuhn, Lakatos saw the merit in portraying scientific activity as taking place in a framework, and coined the phrase ‘research program’ to name what were, in a sense, Lakatos’s alternatives to Kuhn’s paradigms.
Lakatos’ research programs:
- To have a reliable measure of the progress of science, Lakatos suggested that some parts of science, laws and principles, are more basic than others
- Some laws are so fundamental that they come close to being the defining feature of a science. As such, they are not to be blamed for any apparent failure. Rather, the blame is to be placed on the less fundamental components.
- Scientists can seek to solve problems by modifying the more peripheral assumptions as they see fit
- The fundamental principles are the hard core - the defining characteristic of a research program.
- Going from the hard core, we need supplementary assumptions that flesh the program out, to the point that we can make definite predictions.
- These assumptions both supplement the hard core and they underlie the initial conditions used to specify particular situations and theories, presupposed in the statements of observations and experimental results. So, in a way, these assumptions are the methods Kuhn’s paradigms include, too
- Falsifications are to be attributed to these assumptions, not the hard core
- The protective belt: sum of the additional hypotheses supplementing the hard core
- We modify the assumptions to improve the match between the predictions of the program and the results of observation and experiment.
- Guidelines for work are divided between negative and positive heuristics
- Negative heuristics are what scientists are advised not to do
- The positive heuristic is what a scientist is supposed to do
- A research program has to lead to novel predictions that are confirmed, and it has to offer a true program of research, as in, the methods, techniques, all that; it should guide future research
- For Lakatos, a scientific revolution is then the replacement of a degenerative research program by a progressive one
- Degenerative program: loses its coherence and/or fails to provide confirmed novel predictions.
Methodology within a program and the comparison of programs:
- Modifications to the protective belt are okay as long as they’re not ad hoc: they must be independently testable
- The more testable moves a modification allows, the better. It increases the chance of success
- Besides ad hoc tests, Lakatos also ruled out any moves that go away from the hard core. This would destroy the program’s coherence
- We have to adjust Lakatos’ methodology: A program is progressive to the extent that it makes natural, as opposed to novel, predictions that are confirmed, where ‘natural’ stands opposed to ‘contrived’ or ‘ad hoc’.
Problems with Lakatos’ methodology:
- Are there such things as ‘hard cores’ serving to identify research programs to be found in the history of science? Counter evidence comes from the extent to which scientists do on occasions attempt to solve problems by adjusting the fundamentals of the theories or programs in which they work
- “The hard core is unfalsifiable by the methodological decisions of its protagonists”. But do these decisions exist?
- Lakatos himself wrote that he would give criteria for progression and stagnation/degeneration within a program, as well as rules for the elimination of research programs, but his methodology was never able to do this. Lakatos conceded/admitted that his methodology could not diagnose current theories as non-scientific, but could only make judgements in retrospect, with historical hindsight
Resources:
What is This Thing Called Science 4th Edition (CHALMERS)
Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>
Contributions: posts
Spotlight: topics
Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams
- Check out: Register with JoHo WorldSupporter: starting page (EN)
- Check out: Aanmelden bij JoHo WorldSupporter - startpagina (NL)
How and why use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?
- For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
- For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
- For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
- For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
- For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.
Using and finding summaries, notes and practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter
There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.
- Use the summaries home pages for your study or field of study
- Use the check and search pages for summaries and study aids by field of study, subject or faculty
- Use and follow your (study) organization
- by using your own student organization as a starting point, and continuing to follow it, easily discover which study materials are relevant to you
- this option is only available through partner organizations
- Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
- Use the menu above each page to go to the main theme pages for summaries
- Theme pages can be found for international studies as well as Dutch studies
Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?
- Check out: Why and how to add a WorldSupporter contributions
- JoHo members: JoHo WorldSupporter members can share content directly and have access to all content: Join JoHo and become a JoHo member
- Non-members: When you are not a member you do not have full access, but if you want to share your own content with others you can fill out the contact form
Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance
Main summaries home pages:
- Business organization and economics - Communication and marketing -International relations and international organizations - IT, logistics and technology - Law and administration - Leisure, sports and tourism - Medicine and healthcare - Pedagogy and educational science - Psychology and behavioral sciences - Society, culture and arts - Statistics and research
- Summaries: the best textbooks summarized per field of study
- Summaries: the best scientific articles summarized per field of study
- Summaries: the best definitions, descriptions and lists of terms per field of study
- Exams: home page for exams, exam tips and study tips
Main study fields:
Business organization and economics, Communication & Marketing, Education & Pedagogic Sciences, International Relations and Politics, IT and Technology, Law & Administration, Medicine & Health Care, Nature & Environmental Sciences, Psychology and behavioral sciences, Science and academic Research, Society & Culture, Tourisme & Sports
Main study fields NL:
- Studies: Bedrijfskunde en economie, communicatie en marketing, geneeskunde en gezondheidszorg, internationale studies en betrekkingen, IT, Logistiek en technologie, maatschappij, cultuur en sociale studies, pedagogiek en onderwijskunde, rechten en bestuurskunde, statistiek, onderzoeksmethoden en SPSS
- Studie instellingen: Maatschappij: ISW in Utrecht - Pedagogiek: Groningen, Leiden , Utrecht - Psychologie: Amsterdam, Leiden, Nijmegen, Twente, Utrecht - Recht: Arresten en jurisprudentie, Groningen, Leiden
JoHo can really use your help! Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world
1770 |
Add new contribution