Article summary of How university diversity rationales inform student preferences and outcomes by Starck et al. - 2021 - Chapter


What is this article about?

Higher educational institutions seem to embrace diversity and inclusion, and there are different rationales available for doing so. It seems that rationales which assert that diversity provides educational benefits (and is thus instrumental useful), seem to be consistently favored by the U.S. Supreme Court. In the current study, it was examined how instrumental, as opposed to moral, rationales for diversity shape the expectations and experiences of racial majority and minority group members. It was hypothesized that instrumental diversity rational should:

Be especially appealing to White Americans but not to low-status racial minorities. There are three reasons for this hypothesis. First, the purported educational benefits described in instrumental diversity rationales largely serve to provide educational benefits to White individuals. Second, instrumental rationales likely afford a greater sense of belonging to White Americans compared to moral rationales. Organizations than acknowledge and celebrate racial diversity tend to make White individuals feel excluded, and instrumental rationales can lead them to feel more included. Third, instrumental rationales as opposed to moral rationales may alleviate feelings of social identity threat for White Americans, who are often concerned with being stereotypes as ‘prejudiced’. There is also reason to think that for racial minority groups, this preference is not shared. First, the outcomes highlighted of diversity often pertain to the outcomes for White students. Second, it is not clear whether either diversity rationale would also encourage a sense of belonging for racial minorities. Third, instrumental rational might amplify social identity threat for low-status minorities who are stigmatized in educational domains, in comparison to moral rationales.

Dominate diversity discourse in higher education. It was expected that, if White Americans indeed prefer instrumental rational, that their relatively high numerical representation and power would incentivize university policy makers to adopt approaches to appeal to them. Second, universities may utilize instrumental rationales in order to comply with legal precedent. Third, rules that affirm instrumental rationales might make them seem like the default, normative approach to diversity. Based on these ideas, it was expected that universities would be more likely to utilize the instrumental compared to moral rationales.

Be associated with worse relative outcomes for low-status minority students. This hypothesis is based on the finding that instrumental rationales diminish the extent to which people focus specifically on racial representation in their diversity pursuits. This might lead community members to perceive weaker institutional commitments to racial diversity, and is thus less effective in compelling them to comply with or advance this commitment in their own actions.

What can be concluded?

In this study, it was found that instrumental rationales are indeed preferred by White, but not Black Americans. In addition, instrumental rationales were understood as suiting White students best. It was also found that they are the most common approach to diversity in higher education, and that, especially in the absence of a moral approach, they are associated with greater racial disparities in graduation rates. This study thus concludes that the most common approach to diversity in higher education is one that reflects the preferences of White Americans, and privileges the outcomes of them. In addition, these findings support the perspective that diversity and inclusion efforts gain traction when they serve to advance the interests of the majority group. However, these findings could also be interpreted as that moral interpretations are preferred by Black Americans and disfavored by White Americans, and suite Black students the best.

Access: 
Public
Work for WorldSupporter

Image

JoHo can really use your help!  Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world

Working for JoHo as a student in Leyden

Parttime werken voor JoHo

Image

Click & Go to more related summaries or chapters:

Summaries per article with Culture and Diversity at Work at Leiden University 21/22

Summaries per article with Culture and Diversity at Work at Leiden University 21/22

Supporting content: 
Access: 
Public

Study Guide with articlesummaries for Culture and Diversity at Work at University of Leiden

Study guide with articlesummaries for Culture and Diversity at Work at University of Leiden - 2022-2023

Supporting content: 
Access: 
Public

Study Guide with articlesummaries for Culture and Diversity at Work at Leiden University

Articlesummaries with Culture and Diversity at Work at Leiden University

Table of content

  • Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures
  • The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women
  • The vicious cycle linking stereotypes and social roles
  • Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action
  • Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes
  • Stereotypes and prejudice create workplace discrimination
  • Understanding and addressing contemporary racism: From aversive racism to the common ingroup identity model
  • Understanding diversity ideologies from the target’s perspective: A review and future directions
  • Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations
  • The impact of hierarchical structures on the work behavior of women and men
  • Diversity initiative effectiveness: What organizations can (and cannot) expect from diversity recruitment, diversity training, and formal mentoring programs
  • Gender differences in entitlement: The role of system-justifying beliefs
  • Advantaged group members’ reactions to tokenism
  • Diversity in the workplace: A review, synthesis, and future research agenda
  • Recognizing the benefits of diversity: When and how does diversity increase group performance?
  • The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions
  • Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research
  • How university diversity rationales inform student preferences and outcomes
  • Diversity initiatives in the workplace
  • Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda
  • Fail or flourish? Cognitive appraisal moderates the effect of solo status on performance
  • Articlesummaries with prescribed articles for Culture and Diversity at Work 2022/2023
  • Articlesummaries with prescribed articles for Culture and Diversity at Work 2021/2022
Supporting content: 
Access: 
Public
Comments, Compliments & Kudos:

Add new contribution

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org


Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams

Using and finding summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter

There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.

  1. Starting Pages: for some fields of study and some university curricula editors have created (start) magazines where customised selections of summaries are put together to smoothen navigation. When you have found a magazine of your likings, add that page to your favorites so you can easily go to that starting point directly from your profile during future visits. Below you will find some start magazines per field of study
  2. Use the menu above every page to go to one of the main starting pages
  3. Tags & Taxonomy: gives you insight in the amount of summaries that are tagged by authors on specific subjects. This type of navigation can help find summaries that you could have missed when just using the search tools. Tags are organised per field of study and per study institution. Note: not all content is tagged thoroughly, so when this approach doesn't give the results you were looking for, please check the search tool as back up
  4. Follow authors or (study) organizations: by following individual users, authors and your study organizations you are likely to discover more relevant study materials.
  5. Search tool : 'quick & dirty'- not very elegant but the fastest way to find a specific summary of a book or study assistance with a specific course or subject. The search tool is also available at the bottom of most pages

Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?

Quicklinks to fields of study (main tags and taxonomy terms)

Field of study

Access level of this page
  • Public
  • WorldSupporters only
  • JoHo members
  • Private
Statistics
750 1