The Happiness Bundle: content and contributions about the science of happiness
Article summary of Very happy people by Diener & Seligman. (1)
What is this article about?
This is a research report of an experiment where 222 undergraduates were screened for high happiness. The upper 10% of consistently very happy people were compared with average people and very unhappy people. This study has tried to find out what some factor might be that influence high happiness: social relationships, personality and psychopathology, and variables that have been related to subjective well-being in correlational studies. It also examined whether there was a variable that was sufficient for happiness and a variable that was necessary for happiness (sufficient: everyone with the variable is happy, necessary: every happy person has the variable).
What were the results?
On a scale from 5 to 35, the very happy group scored about 30 on life satisfaction. The very happy people had virtually never thought about suicide, could recall many more good events in their lives than bad ones, and had many more positive than negative emotions on a daily basis. The very unhappy people were dissatisfied with life and had equal amounts of positive and negative affect on a daily basis. They reported this about themselves, but their friends and family also rated them dissatisfied. The average group was in the middle of these two groups.
The biggest difference between the very happy group and the average and very unhappy group, was in their fulsome and satisfying interpersonal lives. The very happy people spent the least time alone and the most time socializing and valued their relationships the highest. Good social relationships might be a necessary condition for high happiness.
The very happy people also scored the lowest on psychopathology tests, virtually never in the clinical range. Almost half of the very unhappy group scored in the clinical range.
Also good to note, was that the verry happy people never reported their mood to be "ecstatic", but they did score their mood with a 7, 8 or 9 most of the time.
Broader samples and longitudinal methods are needed to make strong conclusions from these results. These findings do suggest that very happy people have rich and satisfying social relationships and spend little time alone. But it is not yet clear what the causal relationship is here: perhaps happy people have better relationships because of their happiness, or happiness and good relationships are both caused by a third variable. What is clear is that social relationships might be a necessary but are not a sufficient condition for high happiness. Very happy people also experience unpleasant emotions and rarely feel euphoria or ecstacy. They are rather medium to moderatly happy most of the time.
.....read more IBP Social Psychology Summary - Dealing with Adversity and Achieving a Happy Life -ch 12
Social and Organizational Psychology
IBP 2017-2018
Dealing with Adversity and Achieving a Happy Life
Stress: a contributing factor to psychological and physical health problems
- Can stem from traumatic events, or frequent daily hassles
- Interferes with the operation of the body’s immune system, and can be measured at the cellular level
- Stress can be reduced by social support
Loneliness: when a person has fewer and less satisfying relationships than desired
- If you see your personality as “fixed”: you are likely to react to rejection by cutting yourself off from others
- If you perceive yourself as capable of change: experience rejection as an opportunity for future improvement or growth
- Interventions related to self-change help to improve people’s resilience in the face of stress and reduce the likelihood of depression
Discrimination
- Experiencing discrimination based on disability, sexual minorities, and weight, is associated with harm to well-being
- Weight discrimination predicts mortality
Improving mental health
- Regular exercise
- Social support has shown to be beneficial for people with PTSD
- Joining groups can foster social connectedness and help prevent depression
- Practicing self-forgiveness
Is the legal system fair?
- Understand potential sources of error and bias within the current system
- Lineups used to identify criminal suspects are subject to bias if all the suspects are shown at once (simultaneous lineup)
- In legal proceedings, defendants’ race, gender, physical attractiveness, and socioeconomic status can influence jurors’ perceptions and judgments
Happiness: often referred to as subjective well-being with four basic components:
- global life satisfaction
- satisfaction with specific life domains
- a high level of positive feelings
- a minimum of negative feelings
Several factors consistently account for a nations’ average happiness levels:
- degree of social support
- per capita income
- healthy life expectancy
- freedom to make life choices
- generosity toward others
- amount of violence
- degree of corruption
On being happy:
- Happy people are more community-oriented than unhappy people
- Monetary wealth beyond a certain point does not necessarily increase happiness
- The optimum level of well-being theory: very high levels of happiness can foster complacency or lead to unjustified overoptimism
- Growing evidence supports the idea that happiness levels are fundamentally changeable
- Many of the characteristics needed to be a successful entrepreneur are the same ones that contribute to happiness levels
- Self-determination theory: entrepreneurs typically have strong intrinsic motivation
References:
Baron, R., & Branscombe, N. (2016). Social psychology (14th edition)
.....read more Science of Happiness articles
Article summary with Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being - Diener, E. et al.
What is this article about?
The hedonic treadmill model is a model that supposes that good and bad events can only temporarily affect happiness. According to this model, everyone always adapts back to hedonic neutrality. This leads to the conclusion that it is pointless to try and increase happiness. The poorest diseased beggar with no social connections could be just as happy as the healthy billionaire with a lot of close and supportive relationships. But is this really true? This article will make five important revisions to the hedonic treadmill model:
- Individuals' set points are not hedonically neutral.
- People have different set points, partly depending on their temperaments.
- A single person may have multiple happiness set points.
- Well-being set points can change under some conditions.
- Individuals differ in their adaptation to events.
What is the hedonic treadmill theory?
In 1971, Brickman and Campbell came up with the hedonic treadmill. According to them, processes similar to sensory adaptation occur when people experience emotional reactions to life events. Just like we get used to sensory input and are quickly not aware anymore of smells or sounds, we adapt to emotions as well. Myers added to this theory that every desirable experience is transitory. According to the original treadmill theory of Brickman and Campbell, people briefly react to good and bad events, but in a short time they return to neutrality. The theory is based on the automatic habituation model in which psychological systems react to deviations from one's current adaptation level. Automatic habituation processes are adaptive because they allow constant stimuli to fade into the background.
In 1978, Brickman, Coates, and Janoff-Bulman offered initial empirical support for the treadmill model. Brickman had for example studied lottery winners and found that they were not happier than nonwinners. It was also found that people with paraplegia, an impairment in the motor and sensory function of the lower body, were not less happy than people who could walk. The idea of hedonic adaptation was appealing in psychology because it offered an explanation for the observation that people appear to be relatively stable in happiness despite changes in fortune. The theory was widely accepted in psychology. Evidence frequently supported the idea. There soon came longitudinal studies that tracked changes in happiness over time. These studies provided more direct evidence that adaptation can occur. For instance, Silver found that people with spinal cord injuries had strong negative emotions after their crippling accident, but that these negative emotions had already faded after two months.
What revisions can be made to the original hedonic treadmill model?
Are set points always neutral?
The first revision that can be made, is that set points might not always be neutral. The original treadmill theory suggested that people return to a neutral set point after an emotionally significant event. Research now shows that this part of the theory is wrong. Most
.....read more 
Science of Happiness EN artikelen
- heb je de opdracht doorgenomen en weet je wat er van je verwacht wordt?
Ja
- heb je originelen die nodig zijn
Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life - Baumeister e.a. - Article
What is this article about?
Two of the most widely held goals by which people measure and motivate themselves are happiness and a meaningful life. In this article, the relationship between these two goals is discussed. More specifically, although there certainly is (much) overlap between these two, the focus here is on the differences.
How can happiness be defined?
Happiness generally refers to a state of subjective well-being. Happiness be may narrowly or broadly focused: one can be happy to have found a lost key, but one can also be happy that the war has ended. Happiness is conceptualized and measured by researcher in at least two different manners. The first one concerns affect balance, which suggests that happiness is an aggregate of how one feels at different moment. Happiness is then defined as having more pleasant than unpleasant emotional states. The second one concerns life satisfaction, which goes beyond momentary feelings. It refers to an integrative, evaluative assessment of one's entire life. Generally, assessing both of these provides a useful index of subjective well-being.
How can a meaningful life be defined?
Meaningfulness is considered to concern both a cognitive and emotional assessment of whether one's life has purpose and value.
What is the central theorem of the theory that is being proposed in this article?
The authors suggest that the simpler form of happiness (affect balance instead of life satisfaction), at least, is rooted in nature. Every living creature has biological needs, such as wanting to survive and reproduce. Basic motivations make one to pursue and enjoy those needs. Affect balance then depends to a certain degree on whether these basic needs are being satisfied.
While happiness is natural, meaningfulness may depend on culture. In every culture language is being used as a means to use and communicate meanings. Meaningfulness, thus, makes use of culturally transmitted symbols (via language) as a means to evaluate one's life in relation to purposes, values, and other meanings that are also frequently learned from the culture. Thus, meaning is more associated with one's culture than happiness is. An important feature of meaning is that it is not limited to immediately present stimuli
.....read more Study guide with articlesummaries for Science of Happiness at the University of Utrecht
Articlesummaries with Science of Happiness at the University of Utrecht
Table of content
- Revising the adaptation theory of well-being
- Strengths and weaknesses of self-report measures of subjective well-being
- Is the study of happiness a worthy scientific pursuit?
- Non-traditional measures of subjective well-being and their validity
- Concepts and components of well-being
- What are the possibility, desirability, and justifiability of happiness?
- Three revolutions in the global history of happiness
- What is well-being?
- What is eudaimonia?
- The relationship between cognitive outlooks and well-being
- Affective forecasting and impact bias explained
- Factors that might influence high happiness
- The dark side of happiness
- Increasing happiness
- The Sustainable Happiness Model (SHM)
- Using Positive Psychological Interventions (PPIs) to increase subjective well-being
- Impact of the size and scope of government on human well-being
- Well-being in metrics and policy
- Subjective well-being and national satisfaction
- Can and should happiness be a policy goal?
- Including subjective well-being measures in government policies
- The relationship between materialism and well-being
- Affect and emotions as drivers of climate change perception and action
- How pro-environmental behavior can both thwart and foster well-being
- The relationship between social bonds and well-being
- The relationship between social capital, prosocial behavior, and subjective well-being
- Marriage, parenthood and well-being
- The relationship between close relationships and health
The twelve elements of sustainable happiness and contentment - WorldSupporter Theme
The twelve elements of sustainable happiness and contentment (contentions)
- Happiness elements are those elements (conditions, values) that lead to a satisfied life, a satisfied group or a satisfied society.
- These are elements that play a role in the degree of satisfaction you could have as a person or as a group of people (organization, family).
- These elements
The Promise of Sustainable Happiness (summary)
The Promise of Sustainable Happiness
Boehm, J. K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (in press). The promise of sustainable happiness. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press
The article suggests that, despite several barriers withholding people to increase their well-being, less happy people can successfully strive to be happier by learning a variety of effortful strategies and practicing these with determination and commitment. They use the sustainable happiness model (by Lyubomirsky, Sheldon and Schkade, 2005) as theoretical framework. According to the model, three factors contribute to an individual’s happiness level:
The set point
Life circumstances
Intentional activities/effortful acts that are episodic and naturally variable
The journey to happiness has always and still is of great interest, there is empirical evidence that it even leads to positive life outcomes such as a higher income and stronger relationships. The question, however, is whether people can actually attain a level of sustainable happiness.
To answer this question, we first we look at what happy and unhappy people are like:
The first thing that comes to mind is the difference between their ‘objective’ circumstances that could cause a difference in their level of happiness. Some examples include: marital status, age, sex, culture, income etc. It is shown, however, that these factors do not explain the variation in people’s level of well-being.
The article proposes that happiness and unhappiness is due to the subjective experience and construal of the world by people. They interpret their environment differently, leading the authors to explore an individual thoughts, behaviors and motivations. Happier people see the world in a more positive, and thus happiness-promoting, way. Research suggests that happy people are this way because of multiple adaptive strategies:
Construal
Research that involved having happy and unhappy people reflect on similar hypothetical situations / actual life events, revealed that happy people view these events as more pleasant, while unhappy people view these same events as unfavourable..
Social comparison
Findings suggest that people that are happy are less sensitive to feedback about another person or his or her performance (favourable and unfavourable feedback). When performing ‘better’ on a task, all participants became more confident about their skills; however when the other was better, happy people were unaffected while unhappy people were, negatively. Unhappy people seem to feel positive emotions when a peer has done worse than them, even if they both got negative feedback. When they got positive feedback but performed at a lower level than a peer, they felt negative emotions. This was the case in both individual and group settings.
Decision-making
When happy people make life-altering decisions, they tend to be satisfied with their possible options, and only express negative emotions when their sense of self is threatened. Conversely, unhappy people were generally unhappy withthe options offered to them. Happy and unhappy people also differ in how they make decisions in the face of many options. Research suggests that happy individuals are relatively more
.....read more 
The Happy Bundle: content and contributions about a happy and meaningful life
Content and contributions for happiness, contentment and meaningful life
- 275 reads
The World
Add new contribution