![Image](https://www.worldsupporter.org/sites/default/files/styles/medium/public/bundle/wereldbol_summaries_joho_single_boek_1_150x190px_0.png?itok=PgQm9J5z)
Buddhism differs from other religions in various ways. Thus Buddhism, unlike other religions, knows no god, creator or soul. Buddhism is mainly about the individual who has to come to enlightenment. In addition, Buddhism has no truths that must be believed in particular.Buddha taught his followers that all things that exist are relative and dependent on each other and that these things arise from what came before these things. This vision can be seen as an early statement of the scientific principle of cause and effect. Buddha denied the possibility of being aware without involved perceptions, actions and sensations.Some scientists are very interested in Buddhism because Buddhism assumes that there is no self and that dualism does not exist. These scientists focus mainly on Zen Buddhism , because in this form of Buddhism little attention is paid to prayer houses or altars. Zen Buddhism is not very outward-looking in this respect. Zen Buddhism speaks of enlightenment, but what exactly is this?This concept can be used in two ways. First of all, the process of enlighting can be discussed . This process can take place quickly or slowly. In this connection, it is possible to believe in a kind of route that can lead to enlightenment. Enlighting experiences ('kensho') can be experienced. A second form of enlighting is the ultimate enlightenment. This is not a state of consciousness that resembles a religious experience, because it is temporary (like a kensho). Ultimate enlightment can not be explained in terms of a state. There is no route that leads to ultimate enlightenment, because enlightenment is not something that can be obtained. Enightment can not be expressed in words in this connection. In Buddhism, ' samsara' stands for a continuous circle of birth and death. This has to do with the origins of suffering. We...
JoHo WorldSupporter membership (donateurschap): €5,- per jaar
JoHo membership met extra services (abonneeservices):
Online toegang: €10,-
Online toegang + Postbezorg en pickup service + Projectsteun: €15,-
Online toegang + Postbezorg- en pickup service + Extra projectsteun: €20,-
JoHo can really use your help! Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world
The problem of consciousness is related to some of the oldest questions of philosophy: what does the world consist of? Who am I? It relates to the mind-body problem: what is the relationship between the physical and the mental?
Despite the fact that we are learning more and more about the functioning of the brain, consciousness remains a mystery. In the past, they used the term 'élan vital' to explain how non-living things could be made alive. Nowadays this concept is no longer used, since we know that biological processes are responsible for this. Some scientists believe that the same will also happen with the term consciousness. Once we understand how brain processes create a sense of consciousness, then we might not need to use this term anymore.
Consciousness requires some sort of dualism: objectivity vs. subjectivity, inner vs. outer, mind vs. body...
For example: Take a pencil in your hand and look at it. You see the pencil from your own unique perspective, which you cannot share with others. The pencil is part of the outside world, your experience with the pencil is part of your inner world.
The way philosophers view the consciousness problem can generally be divided into monist theories, which suggest that there are one kind of things in the world, and dualist theories, which suggest that there are two kinds of things. Some theories state that the mental world is fundamental and some theories state that the physical world is fundamental.
Monistic theories assume that the world consists of only one kind of matter (body or mind). Some monistic theories state that everything consists of the mind, according to these theories we only have ideas and perceptions of a pencil. We do not know if a pencil really exists. People who assume this are called mentalists or idealists. Berkeley supported this principle. The disadvantage of this perspective is that we can never know for certain whether objects with fixed characteristics exist.
Materialists are also monists. They believe that there is only matter. An example for this is the identity theory, which states that mental experiences are the same as physical experiences. Another example is functionalism, which assumes that mental experiences are the same as functional experiences.
Epiphenomenalism assumes that physical processes cause mental events, but that mental events have no effect on physical events. Huxley was a supporter of this idea. He did not deny that consciousness or subjective experiences existed, but stated that they have no (causal) connection with physical processes. He used
.......read more
There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.
Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?
Field of study
Add new contribution