Team dynamics - summary of chapter 8 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 8
Team dynamics


Teams and informal groups

Teams: groups of two or more people who interact with and influence each other, are mutually accountable for achieving common goals associated with organizational objectives, and perceive themselves as a social entity within an organization.

All teams exist to fulfill some purpose.
Team members are held together by their interdependence and need for collaboration to achieve common goals.

Team members influence each other.
A team exist when it members perceive themselves as a team.

Each type of team in an organization can be distinguished by three characteristics:

  • Team permanence
    How long that type of team usually exists
  • Skill diversity
    Members possess different skills and knowledge
  • Authority dispersion
    The degree that decision-making responsibility is distributed throughout the team

Informal groups

Why do informal groups exist?

  • Human beings are social animals
  • Social identity theory
  • They accomplish personal objectives that cannot be achieved by individuals working alone.
  • We are comforted by the mere presence of other people

Informal groups and organizational outcomes

Informal groups potentially minimize employee stress. This improves employee well-being.
Informal groups are the backbone of social networks.

Advantages and disadvantages of teams

In many situations, people are potentially more motivated when working in teams than when working alone.

  • Employees have a drive to bond and are motivated to fulfill the goals of groups to which they belong
  • Accountability to fellow team members
  • Coworkers become benchmarks of comparison

The challenges of teams

Process losses: resources (including time and energy) expended toward team development and maintenance rather than the task.
Amplified when more people are added or replace others on the team.

Brooks’s law: the principle that adding more people to a late software project only makes it later.

Social loafing

Social loafing: the problem that occurs when people exert less effort (and usually perform at a lower level) when working in teams than when working alone.
A motivational process loss.

More pervasive when:

  • Individual performance is hidden or difficult to distinguish from the performance of other team members
  • When the work is boring or the team’s overall task has low significance
  • Individual characteristics
  • Lack motivation to help the team achieve goals
  • When employees believe they have little control over the team’s success.

Social loafers provide only as much effort as they believe others will provide.

Ways to minimize social loafing:

  • Form smaller teams
  • Specialize tasks
  • Measure individual performance
  • Increase job enrichment
  • Select motivated, team-oriented employees

A model of team effectiveness

A team is effective when it benefits the organization and its members, and its survives long enough to accomplish its mandate.

Organizational and team environment

The organizational and team environment represents all conditions beyond the team’s boundaries that influence its effectiveness.
Team members tend to work together more effectively when

  • They receive some team-based rewards.
  • The organization’s structure assigns discrete clusters of work activity to teams
  • Information systems support team coordination
  • The physical layout of the team’s workspace encourages frequent communication

The environment also generates drives for change within teams

  • External competition
  • Changing societal expectations

Team design elements

Task characteristics

Teams work better when the work is well structured rather than ambiguous or novel.

Low task variability: the same set of tasks every day
Low task analyzability: the work is predictable enough for well-established procedures

The main benefit for well-structured tasks is that it is easier to coordinate the work among several people.

Teams can perform less structured tasks reasonably well then their roles are well defined.

Task interdependence: the extent to which team members must share materials, information, or expertise in order to perform their jobs.
Three levels of task interdependence

  • Pooled interdependence
    When an employee or work unit shares a common resource. Each member works alone but shares raw materials.
  • Sequential interdependence
    The output of one person becomes the direct input for another person or unit
  • Reciprocal interdependence
    Work output is exchanges back and forth among individuals

The higher the level of task interdependence, the greater the need to organize people into teams.
A team structure improves interpersonal communication and thus results in better coordination
High task interdependence motivates most people to be part of the team

Team size

Teams should be large enough to provide the necessary abilities and viewpoints to perform the work, yet small enough to maintain efficient coordination and meaningful involvement of each member.
Small teams operate effectively because they have less process loss.

Team composition

Team effectiveness depends on the qualities of people who are members of those teams.
Teams perform better when their members are highly motivated, possess the required abilities, and have clear role perceptions to perform the assigned task activities.

Teams need people who are motivated and able to work effectively in teams.

The five C’s

  • Cooperating
  • Coordinating
  • Communicating
  • Comforting
  • Conflict handling

Team diversity

Has both positive and negative effects

Advantages

  • They make better decisions
  • Often provide better representation of the team’s constituents

Challenges

  • Takes longer to become a high-performing team

Team processes

Team development

Team members must resolve several issues and pass through several stages of development before emerging as an effective work unit.

Team development

  • Forming
    A period of testing and orientation in which members learn about each other and evaluate the benefits and costs of continued membership
  • Storming
    Interpersonal conflict as members become more proactive and compete for various team roles. Members try to establish norms of appropriate behavior and performance standards.
  • Norming
    The team develops its first real sense of cohesion as roles are established and a consensus forms around group objectives and a common or complementary team-based mental model
  • Performing
    Team members hare learned to efficiently coordinate and resolve conflicts.
  • Adjourning
    The team is about to disband

Developing team identities and mental models

Two sets of processes that are the essence of team development:

  • Developing team identity
    Team development occurs when employees make the team part of their social identity and take ownership of the team’s success
  • Developing team mental models and coordinating routine

Team roles

Role: a set of behaviors that people are expected to perform because they hold certain positions in a team and organization.

Many team roles aren’t formally embedded in job descriptions. They are informally assigned or claimed as part of the team development process.

Accelerating team development trough team building

Team building: a process that consists of formal activities intended to improve the development and functioning of a work team.
Team building interventions are often organized into the following four categories:

  • Goal setting
  • Problem solving
  • Role clarification
  • Interpersonal relations

Team norms

Norms: the informal rules and shared expectations that groups establish to regulate the behavior of their members.

How team norms develop

Norms develop during team formation because people need to anticipate or predict how others will act.

  • Subtle events during the team’s initial interactions can plant norms
  • Norms form as team members discover behavior that help them function more effectively
  • The experiences and values that members bring to the team

Preventing and changing dysfunctional team norms

The best way to establish desirable norms is to clearly state them when the team is created.

Team norms can be organizationally induced.
Introduce teambased rewards that counter dysfunctional norms.

Disband the group and form a new team whose members have more favorable norms.

Team cohesion

Team cohesion: the degree of attraction people feel toward the team and their motivation to remain members.

Influences on team cohesion

Six of the most important influences:

  • Member similarity
  • Team size
  • Member interaction
  • Somewhat difficult entry
  • Team success
  • External competition and challenges

Consequences of team cohesion

Teams with higher cohesion tend to perform better than those with low cohesion.
The team’s existence depends on a minimal level of cohesion.

The relationship between team cohesion and team performance depends on two conditions

  • Team cohesion has less effect on team performance when the team has low task interdependence
  • The effect of cohesion on team performance depends on whether the team’s norms are compatible with or opposed to the organizational objectives.

Teams with higher cohesion perform better, and teams with better performance become more cohesive.

Team trust

Any relationship depends on a certain degree of trust.
Trust: positive expectations one person has toward another person in situations involving risk.

Trust is ultimately perceptual.

Trust is built on tree foundations:

  • Calculus based trust
    A logical calculation that other team members will act appropriately because they face sanctions if their actions violate reasonable expectations.
  • Knowledge-based trust
    Based on the predictability of another team member’s behavior. This predictability refers only to positive expectations.
  • Identification-based trust
    Based on mutual understanding and an emotional bond among team members.

Dynamics on team trust

Employees typically join a team with a moderate or high level of trust in their new coworkers. Swift trust.
People usually believe fellow team members are reasonably competent.

Self-directed teams

Self-directed teams (SDTs): cross-functional work groups that are organized around work processes, complete and entire piece of work requiring several interdependent tasks, and have substantial autonomy over the execution of those tasks.

Success factors for self-directed teams

The successful implementation of self-directed teams depends on several factors:

  • SDTs should be responsible for an entire work process
  • SDTs should have sufficient autonomy to organize and coordinate their work
  • SDTs are more successful when the work site and technology support coordination and communication among team members and increase job enrichment

Virtual teams

Virtual teams: teams whose members operate across space, time, and organizational boundaries and are linked trough information technologies to achieve organizational tasks.

Virtual teams differ from traditional teams in two ways:

  • Their members are not usually co-located
  • Due to their lack of co-location, members of virtual teams depend primarily on information technologies rather than face-to-face interaction to communicate and coordinate their work effort.

Team virtually increases with the geographic dispersion of team members.

Success factors for virtual teams

Virtual teams face all the challenges of traditional teams, compounded by problems arising from time and distance.

Strategies to minimize most virtual team problems.

  • Virtual team members need to apply the effective team behaviors described earlier
  • Good communication technology skills
  • A toolkit of communication channels as well as the freedom to choose the channels that work best for them.
  • Plenty of structure
  • Virtual team members should meet face-to-face fairly early in the team development process

Team decision making

Constraints on team cohesion making

Time constraints

Teams consume time
Production blocking: a time constraint in team decision making due to the procedural requirement that only one person may speak at a time

Evaluation apprehension

A decision-making problem that occurs when individuals are reluctant to mention ideas that seem silly because they believe (often correctly) that other team members are silently evaluating them.

Pressure to conform

Team cohesion leads employees to conform to the team’s norms. It may cause team members to suppress their dissenting opinions, particularly when a strong team norm is related to the issue.

Overconfidence (inflated team efficacy)

Team efficacy: the collective belief among team members in the team’s capability to successfully complete a task.
Teams make worse decisions when they become overconfident and develop a false sense of invulnerability.

Improving creative decision making in teams

Brainstorming

Participants try to think up as many ideas as possible.
Rules

  • Speak freely
  • Don’t criticize others or their ideas
  • Provide as many ideas as possible
  • Build on the ideas that others have presented

Brainwriting

A variation of brainstorming whereby participants write (rather than speak about) and share their ideas.

Electronic brainstorming

A form of brainwriting that relies on networked computers for submitting and sharing creative ideas.

Nominal group technique

A variation of brainwriting consisting of three stages in which participants:

  • Silently and independently document their ideas
  • Collectively describe these ideas to the other team members without critique
  • Silently and independently evaluate the ideas presented.
Access: 
Public

Image

This content is also used in .....

Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition) a summary

Introduction to the filed of Organizational behavioral - summary of chapter 1 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Introduction to the filed of Organizational behavioral - summary of chapter 1 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 1
Introduction to the filed of Organizational behavioral


The field of organizational behavior

Organizational behavior (OB): the study of what people think, feel, and do in and around organizations.
They study this topic at multiple levels of analysis:

  • The individual
  • The team
  • The organization

Organizations: groups of people who work interdependently toward some purpose.
Collective entities. Humans who interact with each other in an organized way.

Requires some minimal level of:

  • Communication
  • Coordination
  • Collaboration

Members have a collective sense of purpose. This purpose isn’t always well defined and agreed on.

Historical foundation s of organizational behavior

OB emerged as a distinct field throughout the 1940s.
During that decade, a few researchers began describing their research as organizational.

Experts on other fields have been studying organizations for many centuries.

Why study organizational behavior?

Comprehend and predict workplace events

The field of organizational behavior uses scientific research to discover systematic relationships, which give us a valuable foundation for comprehending organizational life.
It helps us predict and anticipate future events so we can get along with others, achieve our goals, and minimize unnecessary career risks.

Adopt more accurate personal theories

Influence organizational events

Contemporary developments facing organizations

Organizations are deeply affected by the external environment. They need to maintain a good organization-environment fit by anticipating and adjusting to changes in society.

Technological change

Technological change has always been a disruptive force in organizations, as well as in society.
Innovations dramatically boost productivity, but also usually displace employees and render obsolete entire occupational groups.

Not even top-level executives are immune to the effects of these transformational innovations.

Other technologies potentially improve productivity but more profoundly alter our relationships and patterns of behavior with coworkers, clients, and suppliers.

Other technologies aim to improve health and well-being.

Information technology is one of the most significant forms of technological change in recent times.
Some OB experts argue that information technology gives employees a stronger voice through direct communication with executives and broader distribution of their opinions to coworkers and beyond.

It also created challenges.

  • Tethering people to their jobs for longer hours
  • Reducing their attention spans at work
  • Increasing techno-stress

At a macro level, information technology has reconfigured entire organizations by integrating suppliers and other external

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Individual behavior, personality and values - summary of chapter 2 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Individual behavior, personality and values - summary of chapter 2 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 2
Individual behavior, personality and values


MARS model of individual behavior and performance

For most of the past century, experts have investigated the direct predictions of individual behavior and performance.

  • One of the earliest formulas was: performance = person X situation

Person: individual characteristics
Situation: external influences on the individuals behavior

Another formula
Performance = ability X motivation
The skill-and-will model

AMO model
Ability-motivation-opportunity

Limited interpretation of the situation

MARS
Four variables

  • Motivation
  • Ability
  • Role perception
  • Situational factors

All factors critical influences on an individual’s voluntary behavior and performance
These are direct predictors of behavior on the workplace.

Employee motivation

Motivation: the forces within a person that affect his or her direction, intensity, and persistence of voluntary behavior.
Direction refers to the path along which people steer their effort. Motivation is goal-directed.

Intensity is the amount of effort allocated with the goal.
Persistence refers to the length of time that the individual continues to exert effort toward an objective. Employees sustain their effort until they reach their goal or give up beforehand.

Ability

The natural aptitudes and learned capabilities required to successfully complete a task.
Aptitudes are the natural talents.

Learned capabilities are the physical and mental skills and knowledge you have acquired. They tend to wane over time when not used.
Aptitudes and learned capabilities are the main elements of competencies.

Role perceptions

The degree to which a person understands the job duties assigned to or expected of him or her.

Role clarity exists in three forms:

  • When employees understand the specific duties or consequences for which they are accountable.
  • When employees understand the priority of their various tasks and performance expectations.
  • Understanding the preferred behaviors or procedures for accomplishing tasks.

Situational factors

Individual behavior and performance depend on the situation.
Two main influences:

  • The work context constrains of facilitates behavior and performance
  • Situations provide cues that guide and motivate people

Types of individual behavior

Task performance

The individual’s voluntary goal-directed behaviors that contribute to organizational objectives.
Three types:

  • Proficient task performance
    Prforming the work efficiently and accurately
  • Adaptive
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Perceiving ourselves and others in organizations - summary of chapter 3 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Perceiving ourselves and others in organizations - summary of chapter 3 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 3
Perceiving ourselves and others in organizations


Self-concept: how we perceive ourselves

Self-concept: an individual’s self-beliefs and self-evaluations.
Defined at three levels:

  • Individual
  • Relational
  • Collective

Specifically, we view ourselves in terms of our personal traits (individual), connections to friends and coworkers (relational)and memberships in entities (collective).

Self-concept complexity, consistency and clarity

An individual’s self-concept can be described by three characteristics

  • Complexity
    The number of distinct and important roles or identities that people perceive about themselves
    Self-expansion: increase complexity
    Also the separation of those identities
    Although everyone has multiple selves, only some of those identities dominate their attention at one time.
  • Consistency
    High consistency exist when the individual’s identities require similar personality traits, values, and other tributes.
    Depends on how closely the person’s identities require personal attributes that are similar to his or her actual attributes.
  • Clarity
    The degree to which a person’s self-concept is clear, confidently defined and stable.
    When we are confident about who we are, can describe our important identities to others, and provide the same description of ourselves across time.
    Clarity increases with age and is clearer when a person’s multiple selves have higher consistency.

Effects of self-concept characteristics on well-being and behavior

People tend to have better psychological well-being when they have fairly distinct multiple selves (complexity), that are well established (clarity) and require similar personal attributes that are compatible with the individual’s character (consistency).

Self-concept complexity protects our self-esteem when some roles are threatened or damaged.
People tend to have better well-being when their multiple selves are in harmony with each other with the individual’s personality and values.

Also increases with clarity.

Self-concept has opposing effects on individual behavior and performance.
Employees with complex identities tend to have more adaptive decision making and performance.

Self-concept complexity often produces more diverse social networks.

Highly complex self-concepts require more effort to maintain and juggle, which can be stressful.
Self-concept clarity tends to improve performance and its considered vital for leadership roles.

Provides a clearer path forward.
Feel less threatened by interpersonal conflict.
But: inflexibility

Self-enhancement

A person’s inherent motivation to have a positive self-concept (and to others perceive him or her favorably) such as being competent, attractive, lucky, ethical and important.
Observed in many ways

  • Individuals rate themselves
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Workplace emotions, attitudes, and stress - summary of chapter 4 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Workplace emotions, attitudes, and stress - summary of chapter 4 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 4

Workplace emotions, attitudes, and stress


Emotions in the workplace

Emotions influence almost everything we do in the workplace.
Often occur before cognitive processes and, consequently influence them.

Emotions: physiological, behavioral, and psychological episodes experienced toward an object, person, or event that create a state of readiness.
Quite short.

Directed toward someone or something.
Emotions are experiences, they represent changes in our physiological state, psychological state and behavior.
Most of these emotional reactions are subtle, they occur without our awareness.

Moods are not directed towards anything in particular and tend to be long-term emotional states.

Types of emotions

All emotions have two common features.

  • An associated valance (core affect) signaling that the perceived object or event should be approached or avoided.
  • The level of activation

Emotions, attitudes, and behavior

Attitudes are judgments, whereas emotions are experiences.
We experience emotions very briefly, whereas our attitude towards something or someone is more stable over time.

Beliefs

These are your established perceptions about the attitude object, what you believe to be true.
Each of these beliefs also has a valence, you have a positive or negative feeling about each belief.

Feelings

Represent your conscious positive or negative evaluations of the attitude object.
Most of the time, your beliefs about something or someone affect your feelings, but the reverse sometimes occurs. Your feelings about something can cause you to change your feelings about specific beliefs regarding that target.

Behavioral intentions

Your motivation to engage in a particular behavior regarding the attitude object.

Attitude-behavior contingencies

  • People with the same beliefs might form quite different feelings toward the attitude object because they have different valences for those beliefs.
  • People with the same feelings toward the attitude object often develop different behavioral intentions because of their unique experiences, personal values, self-concept, and other individual differences.

How emotions influence attitudes and behavior

Our brain tags incoming sensory information with emotional markers based on a quick and imprecise evaluation of whether that information supports or threatens our innate drives.
They are automatic and non-conscious.

The experienced emotions influence our feelings about the attitude object.

Generating positive emotions at work

Cognitive dissonance

Cognitive dissonance: an emotional experience caused by a perception that our beliefs, feelings, and behavior are incongruent with one

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Foundations of employee motivation- summary of chapter 5 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Foundations of employee motivation- summary of chapter 5 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 5
Foundations of employee motivation

Motivation: the forces within a person that affect his or her direction, intensity and persistence of voluntary behavior.


Employee engagement

Employee engagement: individual emotional and cognitive motivation, particularly a focused, intense, persistent, and purposive effort toward work-related goals.
An emotional involvement in, commitment to, and satisfaction with the work.

Also high level of absorption in the work and self-efficacy.

Most employees aren’t very engaged.
Actively disengaged employees tend to be disruptive at work, not just disconnected from work.

Employee drives and needs

Drives: hardwired characteristics of the brain that correct deficiencies or maintain an internal equilibrium by producing emotions to energize individuals. (primary needs).
Innate and universal.

The starting point of motivation because they generate emotions.

Needs: goal-directed forces that people experience.
Motivational forces of emotions channeled toward particular goals to correct deficiencies or imbalances.

The emotions we eventually become conscious aware of.

Drives and emotions → needs → decisions and behavior

Individual differences in needs

Everyone has the same drives.
People develop different intensities of needs in a particular situation.

Self-concepts, social norms and past experience amplify or suppress emotions, thereby resulting in stronger or weaker needs.

  • Need can be ‘learned’ to some extent.
  • Regulate a person’s motivated decisions and behavior.

Maslow’s needs hierarchy theory

A motivation theory of needs arranged in a hierarchy, whereby people are motivated to fulfill a higher need as a lower one becomes gratified.
Five categories, which Maslow called primary needs.

  • Self-actualization
  • Esteem
  • Belongingness
  • Safety
  • Physiological

And

  • The desire to know
  • The desire for aesthetic beauty

Two drives that did not fit within the hierarchy

Humans are motivated by several primary needs (drives) at the same time, but the strongest source of motivation is the lowest unsatisfied need.
But people have an ongoing need for self-actualization, it is never really fulfilled.

It is a growth need, it continues to develop even when temporarily satiated.

But
Maslow’s need hierarchy theory has been dismissed by most motivation experts.

  • Not a order adequately to the hierarchy
  • Need fulfillment seems to last for a briefer period of time
  • People have different needs hierarchies

Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation

Intrinsic motivation:

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Applied Performance Practices- summary of chapter 6 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Applied Performance Practices- summary of chapter 6 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 6
Applied Performance Practices


The meaning of money in the workplace

Money is much more than an object of compensation for an employee’s contribution to organizational objectives.
Money relates to our needs and our self-concept.

It generates a variety of emotions.
Money is a symbol of achievement and status, a motivator, and an influence on our propensity to make ethical or risky decisions.

To some extent, the influence of money on human thoughts and behavior occurs nonconsiously.

The meaning of money varies considerably form one person to the next.
The meaning and effects of money differ between men and women.

  • Men attach more importance or value to money
  • Men are more likely to view money as a symbol of power and status as well as the means to autonomy.
  • Women are more likely to view money in terms of things for which it can be exchanged

The meaning of money varies across cultures.

  • People in countries with high power distance tend to have a high respect and priority for money
  • People in countries with a strong egalitarian culture are discouraged from openly talking about money or displaying their personal wealth

The motivational effect of money is due more to its symbolic value than to what it can buy.

Financial reward practices

Membership- and seniority-based rewards

Sometimes called pay for pulse.

Sample rewards

Advantages

Disadvantages

Fixed pay

May attract applicants

Doesn’t directly motivate performance

Most employee benefits

Minimized stress of insecurity

May discourage poor performers from leaving

Paid time off

Reduces turnover

‘golden handcuffs’ may undermine performance

 

Job status-based rewards

Companies measure job worth through job evaluation.
Job evaluation: systematically rating the worth of jobs within an organization by measuring the required skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions.

 

Sample rewards

Advantages

Disadvantages

Promotion-based

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Decision making and creativity- summary of chapter 7 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Decision making and creativity- summary of chapter 7 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 7
Decision making and creativity


Rational choice decision making

Decision making: the conscious process of making choices among alternatives with the intention of moving toward some desired state of affairs.

Rational choice decision making selects the best alternative by calculating the probability that various outcomes will occur from the choices and the expected satisfaction from each of those outcomes.
Rely primarily on two pieces of information:

  • The probability that each outcome will occur
  • The valence or expected satisfaction of each outcome

Rational choice decision-making process

Steps:

  1. To identify the problem or recognize an opportunity
  2. Choose the best decision process
  3. Discover or develop possible choices
  4. Select the choice with the highest value
  5. Implement the selected choice
  6. Evaluate the selected choice

Programmed decisions: follow standard operating procedures.
They have been resolved in the past, so the optimal solution has already been identified and documented.

Non-programmed decisions: require all steps in he decision model because the problems are new, complex, or ill-defined.

Identifying problems and opportunities

Problems with problem identification

Five of the most widely recognized problems:

Solution-focused problems

Some decision makers describe the problems as a veiled solution.
They fail to fully diagnose the underlying causes that need to be addressed.

Decisive leadership

Many leaders announce problems or opportunities before having a change to logically asses the situation. The result is often a misguided effort to solve an ill-defined problem or resources wasted on a poorly identified opportunity.

Stakeholder framing

Stakeholders provide (or hide) information in ways that makes the decision maker see the situation as a problem, opportunity, or steady sailing.

Perceptual defense

People sometimes fail to become aware of problems because they block out bad news as a coping mechanism.

Mental models

Decision makers are victims of their own problem framing due to existing mental models.
Mental models are visual or relational images in our mind of the external world.

Identifying problems and opportunities more effectively

One way to improve the process is by becoming aware of the five problem identification biases.
Another way is to create a norm of ‘divine discontent’. Decision makers with this mindset are never satisfied with current conditions, so they more actively search for problems and opportunities.

Or discussing the situation with colleagues and clients.

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Team dynamics - summary of chapter 8 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Team dynamics - summary of chapter 8 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 8
Team dynamics


Teams and informal groups

Teams: groups of two or more people who interact with and influence each other, are mutually accountable for achieving common goals associated with organizational objectives, and perceive themselves as a social entity within an organization.

All teams exist to fulfill some purpose.
Team members are held together by their interdependence and need for collaboration to achieve common goals.

Team members influence each other.
A team exist when it members perceive themselves as a team.

Each type of team in an organization can be distinguished by three characteristics:

  • Team permanence
    How long that type of team usually exists
  • Skill diversity
    Members possess different skills and knowledge
  • Authority dispersion
    The degree that decision-making responsibility is distributed throughout the team

Informal groups

Why do informal groups exist?

  • Human beings are social animals
  • Social identity theory
  • They accomplish personal objectives that cannot be achieved by individuals working alone.
  • We are comforted by the mere presence of other people

Informal groups and organizational outcomes

Informal groups potentially minimize employee stress. This improves employee well-being.
Informal groups are the backbone of social networks.

Advantages and disadvantages of teams

In many situations, people are potentially more motivated when working in teams than when working alone.

  • Employees have a drive to bond and are motivated to fulfill the goals of groups to which they belong
  • Accountability to fellow team members
  • Coworkers become benchmarks of comparison

The challenges of teams

Process losses: resources (including time and energy) expended toward team development and maintenance rather than the task.
Amplified when more people are added or replace others on the team.

Brooks’s law: the principle that adding more people to a late software project only makes it later.

Social loafing

Social loafing: the problem that occurs when people exert less effort (and usually perform at a lower level) when working in teams than when working alone.
A motivational process loss.

More pervasive when:

  • Individual performance is hidden or difficult to distinguish from the performance of other team members
  • When the work is boring or the team’s overall task has low significance
  • Individual characteristics
  • Lack motivation to
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Communicating in teams and organizations - summary of chapter 9 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Communicating in teams and organizations - summary of chapter 9 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 9
Communicating in teams and organizations

Communication: the process by which information is transmitted and understood between two or more people.


The importance of communication

  • Coordination
  • In addition to coordination, communication is critical for organizational learning. It is the means through which knowledge enters the organization and is distributed to employees.
  • A function of communication is decision making.
  • It also changes behavior.
  • Communication supports employee well-being.

A model of communication

Communication flows through one or more channels (also called media) between the sender and receiver.
The sender forms a message and encodes it.

The encoded message is transmitted to the intended receiver.
The receiver senses and decodes the incoming message into something meaningful.

In most situations, the sender looks for evidence that the other person received and understood the transmitted message.
Communication is not a free-flowing conduit, the transmission of meaning from one person to another is hampered by noise.

Influences on effective encoding and decoding

Effective communication depends on the sender’s and receiver’s ability, motivation, role clarity, and situational support to efficiently and accurately encode and decode information.

Four main factors influence the effectiveness of the encoding-decoding process

  • The sender en receiver encode and decode more effectively when they have similar ‘codebooks’
  • Improves with experience
  • When the sender and receiver are skilled and motivated to use the selected communication channel(s)
  • The process depends on the sender’s and receiver’s shared mental models of the communication context

Communication channels

Two main types of channels

  • Verbal
  • Nonverbal

Problems with email and other digital message channels

Four top complaints:

  • Poor communication of emotions
  • Less politeness and respectfulness
    Flaming: messages that convey strong negative emotions
    Individuals can post digital messages before their emotions subside.
    Digital messages are impersonal
  • Cumbersome medium for ambiguous, complex, and novel situations
  • Contributes to information overload

Workplace communication through social media

Social media are more conversational and reciprocally interactive between sender and receiver, resulting in a sense of community.
Each type of social media serves a unique combination of functions.

Enterprise social

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Power and influence in the workplace - summary of chapter 10 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Power and influence in the workplace - summary of chapter 10 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 10
Power and influence in the workplace


The meaning of power

Power: the capacity of a person, team or organization to influence others.

  • It is only the potential
  • Power is based on the target’s perception that the power controller holds
  • Power involves asymmetric (unequal) dependence of one party on another party
    Countervailing power: the capacity of a person, team or organization to keep a more powerful person or group in the exchange relationship.
  • All power relationships depend on some minimum level of trust

Managers typically have more power, whereas employees have weaker countervailing power.
Sometimes employees have more power than their bosses.

Power is derived from four sources:

  • Legitimate
  • Reward
  • Coercive expert
  • Referent

Four contingencies of power:

  • The employees or department’s substitutability
  • Centrality
  • Discretion
  • Visibility

Sources of power in organizations

Tree sources of power originate mostly form the power holder’s formal position or informal role

  • Legitimate
  • Reward
  • Coercive

Two other sources of power originate mainly from the power holder’s own characteristics

  • Expert
  • Referent

Legitimate power

Legitimate power: an agreement among organizational members that people in certain roles can request certain behaviors of others.
This perceived right or obligation originates from formal job descriptions as well as informal rules of conduct.

Legitimate power has restrictions.
It gives the power holds only the right to ask others to perform a limited domain of behaviors. This domain is the zone of indifference.

The size of the zone of indifference increases with the level of trust in the power holder.
Some values and personality traits also make people more obedient to authority.
The organization’s culture represents another influence on the willingness of employees to follow orders.

Norm of reciprocity: a felt obligation and social expectation of helping or otherwise giving something of value to someone who has already helped or given something of value to you.
It is a form of legitimate power.

Legitimate power through information control

A particularly potent form of legitimate power occurs where people have the right to control information that others receive.

  • Information is a resource
  • Selectively distributing information in a way that affects how those receiving the information perceive
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Conflict and negotiation in the workplace - summary of chapter 11 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Conflict and negotiation in the workplace - summary of chapter 11 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 11
Conflict and negotiation in the workplace


Meaning and consequences of conflict

Conflict: the process in which one party perceives that its interests are being opposed or negatively affected by another party.

Conflict is ultimately based on perceptions. It exists whenever one party believes that another might obstruct its efforts, regardless of whether the other party actually intends to do so.

Is conflict good or bad?

Conflict can have negative consequences under some circumstances:

  • Reducing employee performance by consuming otherwise productive time
  • Stressful
  • Increases job dissatisfaction
  • People who experience conflict tend to reduce their information sharing and other forms of coordination with each other.
  • Conflict fuels organizational politics
  • Conflict may undermine team cohesion and performance

Benefits of conflict

Optimal conflict perspective: organizations are most effective when employees experience some level of conflict, but becomes less effective with high levels of conflict.

  • Conflict energizes people to debate issues and evaluative alternatives more thoroughly.
    They probe and test each other’s way of thinking to better understand the underlying issues that need to be addressed.
  • Moderate levels of conflict prevent organizations from becoming nonresponsive to their external environment.
  • When team members have a dispute or competition with external sources, this represents and external challenge that potentially increases cohesion within the team.

The emerging view: task and relationship conflict

There are various types of conflicts with different consequences.
The two dominant types are:

  • Task conflict: a type of conflict in which people focus their discussion around the issue while showing respect for people who have other points of view. Constructive conflict.
    Process conflict → how the work should be done and who should perform the various task roles.
    Functional
  • Relationship conflict: a type of conflict in which people focus on characteristics of other individuals, rather than on the issues, as the source of conflict.
    Dysfunctional

Separating task form relationship conflict

Separating task form relationship conflict is not easy.
Three conditions potentially minimize the level of relationship conflict during task conflict episodes:

  • Emotional intelligence and emotional stability.
  • Cohesive team
  • Supportive team norms

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Leadership in organizational settings- summary of chapter 12 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Leadership in organizational settings- summary of chapter 12 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 12
Leadership in organizational settings


What is leadership?

Leadership: influencing, motivating, and enabling others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organizations of which they are members.

  • Leaders motivate others through persuasion and other influence tactics
  • Leaders are enablers

Shared leadership

Shared leadership: the view that leadership is a role, not a position assigned to one person. Consequently, people within the team and organization lead each other.

Shared leadership typically supplements formal leadership. Employees lead along with the formal manager, rather than replace the manager.
Shared leadership flourishes in organizations where the formal leaders are willing to delegate power and encourage employees to take initiative and risks without fear of failure. (a learning orientation culture).

Also collaborative rather than competitive.

Transformational leadership perspective

The most popular leadership perspective is transformational leadership.
Transformational leadership: a leadership that explains how leaders change teams or organizations by creating, communicating, and modeling a vision for the organization or work unit and inspiring employees to strive for that vision.

Four elements:

  • Develop and communicate a strategic vision
  • Model the vision
  • Encourage experimentation
  • Build commitment to the vision

Develop and communicate a strategic vision

The heart of transformational leadership is a strategic vision.
Vision: a positive image or model of the future that energizes and unifies employees.

Sometimes this vision is created by the leader, at other times it is formed by employees or other stakeholders and then adopted and championed by the formal leader.

An effective strategic vision has several identifiable features:

  • It refers to an idealized future with a higher purpose
    This purpose is associated with personal values that directly or indirectly fulfill the needs of multiple stakeholders.
  • A vision is a challenging, distant, and abstract goal. So it needs to motivate employees to accomplish it.
  • It is unifying

A strategic vision is necessarily abstract for two reasons:

  • The vision hasn’t yet been experienced, so it isn’t possible to detail what the vision looks like
  • An abstract description enable s the vision to remain stable over time, yet is sufficiently flexible to accommodate operational adjustments in a shifting external environment.

A strategic vision’s effectiveness depends on how leaders convey it to followers and other stakeholders.

  • Effective transformational
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Designing organizational structures - summary of chapter 13 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Designing organizational structures - summary of chapter 13 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior 
Chapter 13
Designing organizational structures

Organizational structure: the division of labor as well as the patterns of coordination, communication, workflow, ad formal power that direct organizational activities.


Two fundamental processes in organizational structure:

  • Division of labor
  • Coordination

Four main elements of organizational structure:

  • Span of control
  • Centralization
  • Formalization
  • Departmentalization

Contingencies of organizational design:

  • External environment
  • Organizational size
  • Technology
  • Strategy

Division of labor and coordination

Division of labor

Division of labor: the subdivision of work into separate jobs assigned to different people.
Subdivided work leads to job specialization.

Job specialization increases work efficiency.

Coordination of work activities

When people divide work among themselves, they require coordinating mechanisms to ensure that everyone works in concert.
Coordination is so closely connected to division of labor that the optimal level of specialization is limited by the feasibility of coordinating the work. An organization’s ability to divide work among people depends on how well those people can coordinate each other.

Coordination tends to become more expensive and difficult as the division of labor increases.

Coordinating mechanisms:

  • Informal communication
    All organizations rely on informal communication as a coordinating mechanism.
    Includes sharing information on mutual tasks as well as forming common mental models so that employees synchronize work activities using the same mental road map.

Vital in nonroutine and ambiguous situations.
Liaison roles, expected to communicate and share information with coworkers in other work units. Integrator roles, people are responsible for coordinating a work process by encouraging employees in each work unit to share information and informally coordinate work activities.

  • Formal hierarchy
  • Standardization

 

 

Form of coordination

Description

Subtypes/ strategies

Informal communication

Sharing information on mutual tasks.

Forming common mental models to synchronize work activities

Direct communication

Liaison roles

Integrator roles

Temporary teams

Formal hierarchy

Assigning legitimate power to individuals, who then use this power to direct work processes and allocate resources

Direct supervision

Formal communication channels

Standardization

Creating routine patterns of behavior or output

Standardized skills

Standardized processes

Standardized output

 

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Organizational culture- summary of chapter 14 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Organizational culture- summary of chapter 14 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 14
Organizational culture

Organizational culture: the values and assumptions shared within an organization.


Elements of organizational culture

Shared values and assumptions relate to each other and are associated with artifacts.

Values: stable, evaluative beliefs that guide our preferences for outcomes or courses of action in a variety of situations. Conscious perceptions about what is good or bad, right or wrong.
Shared values: values that people within the organization or wok unit have in common and place neat the top of their hierarchy of values.

Shared assumptions: nonconscious, taken-for-granted perceptions or ideal prototypes of behavior that are considered the correct way to think and act toward problems and opportunities.

Espoused versus enacted values

Espoused values: the values that corporate leaders hope will eventually become the organization’s culture, or at least the values they want others to believe guide the organization’s decisions and actions.
Usually socially desirable.

Enacted values: when they actually guide and influence decisions and behavior. Values put into practice.

Content of organizational culture

Organizations differ in the relative ordering of shared values. (cultural content).

Problems

  • People oversimplify the diversity of cultural values in organizations
  • Most measures ignore the shared assumptions aspect of an organizational culture
  • Many measures of organizational culture incorrectly assume that organizations have a fairly clear, unified culture that is easily decipherable.

In reality, an organizational culture is typically blurry and fragmented.

Organizational subcultures

When discussing organizational culture, we are really referring to the dominant culture.
Dominant culture: the values and assumptions shared most consistently and widely by the organization’s members.

Organizations are composed of subcultures, located throughout their various divisions, geographic regions, and occupational groups.
Some subcultures enhance the dominant culture by espousing parallel assumptions and values.

Others differ from, but do not conflict the dominant culture.
Countercultures embrace values or assumptions that directly oppose the organization’s dominant culture.
It is also possible that some organizations consist of subcultures with no decipherable dominant culture at all.

Subcultures, particularly countercultures, potentially create conflict and dissension among employees.
But they also serve two important functions:

  • They maintain the organization’s standards of performance and ethical behavior
  • Subcultures act as spawning groups for emerging values that keep the firm aligned with the evolving need and expectations of stakeholders.

Deciphering organizational culture through

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Organizational changes - summary of chapter 15 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Organizational changes - summary of chapter 15 of Organizational Behavior by Mcshane, S. (8th edition)

Image

Organizational Behavior
Chapter 15
Organizational changes


Lewin’s force field analysis model

Organizations operate as open systems that need to keep pace with ongoing changes in their external environment.
Successful organizations monitor their environments and take appropriate steps to maintain a compatible fit with new external conditions.

Employees in successful companies embrace change as an integral part of organizational life.

Force field analysis: Kurt Lewin’s model of systemwide change that helps change agents diagnose the forces that drive and restrain proposed organizational change.

  • One side of the force field model represents driving forces that push organizations toward a new state of affairs.
  • The other side of Lewin’s model represents the restraining forces that maintain the status quo. Resistance to change.

Stability occurs when the driving and restraining forces are roughly in equilibrium, they are of approximately equal strength in opposite directions.

  • Change occurs by unfreezing.
    Unfreezing: the first part of the change process, in which the change agent produces disequilibrium between the driving and restraining forces.
  • Moving to a desired condition
  • Refreezing: the latter part of the change process, in which systems and structures are introduced that reinforce and maintain the desired behaviors.

Understanding resistance to change

Resistance to change takes many forms, ranging from over work stoppages to subtle attempts to continue the old ways.
Subtle resistance is more common than overt resistance.

Resistance is a common and natural human response.

Resistance is a form of conflict, but change agents unfortunately sometimes interpret that disagreement as relationship conflict.
Perversely, the change agent’s conflict-oriented response to resistance tends to escalate the conflict, which often generates even stronger resistance to the change initiative.

A more productive approach is to view resistance to change as task conflict.
From the task conflict perspective, resistance is a signal either that the change agent has not sufficiently prepared employees for change or that the change initiative should be altered or improved.

Employees might not feel sufficiently strong urgency to change, or they might feel the change strategy is ill-conceived.
Or they lack confidence to change or believe that change will make them worse of than the current situation.

Resistance is also a form of voice, so discussion potentially improves procedural justice through voice, as well as decision making through involvement.
By redirecting

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Introduction to organisational psychology
Follow the author: SanneA
More contributions of WorldSupporter author: SanneA:
Comments, Compliments & Kudos:

Add new contribution

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Promotions
vacatures

JoHo kan jouw hulp goed gebruiken! Check hier de diverse studentenbanen die aansluiten bij je studie, je competenties verbeteren, je cv versterken en een bijdrage leveren aan een tolerantere wereld

Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org


Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams

How and why would you use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?

  • For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
  • For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
  • For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
  • For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
  • For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.

Using and finding summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter

There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.

  1. Use the menu above every page to go to one of the main starting pages
    • Starting pages: for some fields of study and some university curricula editors have created (start) magazines where customised selections of summaries are put together to smoothen navigation. When you have found a magazine of your likings, add that page to your favorites so you can easily go to that starting point directly from your profile during future visits. Below you will find some start magazines per field of study
  2. Use the topics and taxonomy terms
    • The topics and taxonomy of the study and working fields gives you insight in the amount of summaries that are tagged by authors on specific subjects. This type of navigation can help find summaries that you could have missed when just using the search tools. Tags are organised per field of study and per study institution. Note: not all content is tagged thoroughly, so when this approach doesn't give the results you were looking for, please check the search tool as back up
  3. Check or follow your (study) organizations:
    • by checking or using your study organizations you are likely to discover all relevant study materials.
    • this option is only available trough partner organizations
  4. Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
    • by following individual users, authors  you are likely to discover more relevant study materials.
  5. Use the Search tools
    • 'Quick & Easy'- not very elegant but the fastest way to find a specific summary of a book or study assistance with a specific course or subject.
    • The search tool is also available at the bottom of most pages

Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?

Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance

Field of study

Check the related and most recent topics and summaries:
Activity abroad, study field of working area:
Countries and regions:
Institutions, jobs and organizations:
Access level of this page
  • Public
  • WorldSupporters only
  • JoHo members
  • Private
Statistics
5498