Environmental Psychology 4 -Spatial planning and design

Environmental Psychology elective at Leiden University (2020-2021)

Lecture 4: Spatial planning and design

Environmental perception

Compared to traditional perception research:

  • Perceiver is in the scene
  • Perceiver is purposive, has a plan
  • Stimuli are complex (Berleyne’s three classes of stimulus properties):
  1. Psychophysical: intensity of stimulation, brightness of colors, volume of sound
  2. Ecological: indicative of positive or negative environmental conditions for people
  3. Collative stimulus properties

Collative stimulus properties

Properties based on comparisons between elements in the stimulus field:
  • Order=e.g.:symmetry
  • Complexity
  • Diversity =organized complexity
Properties based on comparisons between succession of stimuli:
  • Newness
  • Surprisingness

Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S.,1989. The experience of nature. A psychological perspective

                                 BASIC NEEDS

                  Understanding      Exploration
---------------------------------------------

Immediate  Coherence             Diversity

Inferred,       Legibility                 Mystery
Predicted

Coherence: A coherent scene is orderly: it hangs together
Diversity: The number of different elements in a scene: its richness
Legibility: A well-structured space with distinctive elements, so that it is easy both to find one’s way within the scene and to find one’s way back to the starting point
Mystery: The promise of further information if one could walk deeper into the scene

Territoriality 

Pattern of behavior and attitudes based on perceived, attempted or actual control of a definable physical space, involving occupation, defense, personalization, and marking
 
Types of terriroriality:
  • Primary (home, or spaces within home (e.g. bedroom)
  • Secondary (office, lobby, stairway, elevator)
  • Public (park, sidewalk, beach, parking place)
Effects of terriroriality/ownership
  • Infringement (invasion, violation, contamination) and defense (preventative reaction)
  • Warding off crime (defensible space), creating social order, improve maintenance (e.g. ‘adoption’ of neighbourhood park, playground, highway)

 Applications in design and management for public territory

Neighbourhoods: increased ownership --> improved safety, reduced noise and air pollution, made surveillance easier
Hospitals: increased personalization --> increased wellbeing, faster recovery
 

Kaplan, R. & Austin, M. E., 2004. Out in the country: sprawl and the quest for nature nearby

  • People like to live near nature
  • On an aggregate level this causes urban sprawl and the destruction of nature
  • So for people moved to live “out in the country”, what were the main reasons?

Research questions:

  • Which kind of nature is specifically liked?
  • How important is nature for community satisfaction?
  • Is there a way to solve the dilemma, make solutions more environmentally sustainable

Conclusion of research:

  • Forest is most important satisfier of “living out in the country”
  • Having a forest nearby is more satisfying than having a big house
    • Having smaller houses and leaving more room for forests is better
  • Based on perceived ownership:
    • Communally owned forests may be the way to preserve forests

Devlin, A. S., Andrade, C. C., & Carvalho, D., 2016. Qualities of inpatient hospital rooms: Patients’ perspectives

Ulrich’s theory of supportive design in healthcare

  • Design can promote well-being when three essential needs are addressed:

    • Sense of control over surroundings (e.g., single rooms, adjustable bed, control over TV)
    • Access to social support (e.g., bedside phone, privacy, seating for visitors, or overnight accommodations)
    • Access to positive distractions (e.g., natural view, plants, music, TV)

Evans, G. W., Lepore, S. J., & Schroeder, A.,1996. The role of interior design elements in human responses to crowding.

  • High density leads to psychological distress
  • High density leads to social withdrawal
  • High density in home disturbs supportive relationships
  • Few studies on interior design and crowding
  • Floor-plan likely to influence social interaction patterns within home

Space syntax:architectural theory on elements and relationships in design

Depth: the number of spaces one must pass through to go from one place to the next
 
Conclusion of study: 
  • Distress due to high density can be prevented by increased architectural depth
  • Ease of controlling social interaction reduces social withdrawal
  • Paradox: people have better, more supportive  relationships when environment facilitates being alone

Evans, G. W., & Kim, P., 2007. Childhood poverty and health. Cumulative risk exposure and stress dysregulation

Childhood poverty leads to increased morbidity, decreased life span
 
Multiple risks:
  • Housing quality

    • Substandard housing
  • Physical context
    • Noise 
    • Inside density (people/room ratio)
  • Social context
    • Family turmoil
    • Child’s separation from parents
    • Exposure to violence

Findings in study:

  • Cortisol level higher by longer poverty duration; not mediated by multiple risk (possibly due to delay in effect)
  • Longer poverty period related to less adequate stress regulation as shown by blood pressure changes during Math task; mediated by multiple risk
  •  Children are more at risk to stressors when they are younger

Conclusion: 

  • “Elevated cumulative risk exposure during early childhood compromises the ability of the body to handle environmental demands efficiently”
  • Stress dysregulation potentially explains association between childhood social class (NOT adult social class) and morbidity/mortality

Staats, H., & Groot, P. (2019). Seat choice in a crowded cafe: Effects of eye contact, distance, and anchoring.

Where people want to sit in a café relates to the spatial position of other nearby people
Intimacy and privacy levels may determine seat choice

Keeping distance: two factors:

  • Intimacy

    • Approach and avoidance tendencies in an interpersonal setting

      • Hypothesis 1a: minimal eye-contact
      • Hypothesis 1b: maximal distance
  • Privacy
    • Control over social input
      •     Hypothesis 1c: maximal privacy

Secondary measures:

  • Emotional response to available seats

    • Two components: “pleasure” and “arousal”
  • Social cognitions
    • Three components: “sad-lonely”, “voluntary contact”, and “obliged contact”

Results of study: What seating preference did participants indicate?

  • Participants indicated preference for a low eye-contact seat (Scenario 1) and for a seat that was ‘anchored’ to a wall and thus more private (Scenario 3). Unexpectedly, the size of the table (Scenario 2) did not influence seating preference.

Conclusion:

  • Most of the lone café visitors will prefer a less intimate, more private kind of seat, in accordance with theory
  • However, a minority of people actually prefers a more intimate, less private kind of seat, which they find both pleasurable and arousing
 
Access: 
Public
Work for WorldSupporter

Image

JoHo can really use your help!  Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world

Working for JoHo as a student in Leyden

Parttime werken voor JoHo

Image

This content is also used in .....

Environmental Psychology - Leiden University

Environmental Psychology

Environmental Psychology

Education Category: General
Ages: 16+

Environmental Psychology elective at Leiden University (2020-2021)

Lecture 1: Setting the Scene

The focus of the course is on:

  • The relations between persons and environments
  • The social origin and meaning of (many) man-environment interactions
  • Opportunities for ‘change for the better’: increased well-being, improved environmental quality, by behavioral interventions

People in the environment:

  • In this topic we focus on theories, methods, and research designs that take the physical environment into account.
    • What does the environment do to humans?
    • What do humans do to the environment?

The social origin and meaning of man-environment interactions:

  • Home, school, neighbourhood, workplace... All describe physically defined environments with a clearly social character  
  • Example: Green schoolyards result in better well-being for children than gray schoolyards

Opportunities for ‘change for the better’

  • Raising awareness, using solar panels etc...
  • Why and how do people act sustainably? How can we encourage them?

Career perspectives:

  • Researcher (basic or applied)
  • Consultant
  • Environmental policy maker
  • Environmental management

7 papers important for this topic

  1. Wohlwill (1970): Phylosofical introductory paper about the role of environmental psychology (this lecuture)
  2. Goldberg (1969): Observational study of specific urban phenomenon (topic of lecture 2)
  3. Kaplan (1995): Theoretical paper about the restorative effects of nature (topic of lecture 3)
  4. Gosling, Ko, Mannarelli, and Morris (2002): Systematic approach of using the environmental “design” to form a personality impression (topic of lecture 4)
  5. Hardin (1968): Descriptive paper about the psychological fundaments of the sustainability issues (topic of lecture 5)
  6. Van der Wal, Van Horen, and Grinstein (2018): Experimental design testing a strategy to enhance sustainable behavior (topic of lecture 6)
  7. Kotler (2011): Research letter to steer marketeers towards a more sustainable vision and mission (topic of lecture 7)

Wohlwill: (1970). The emerging discipline of environmental psychology. American Psychologist, 25, 303-312.

Three forms of relationship between person and physical environment:
1.Environment guides and constrains behavior: barriers, compatibility, ‘fit’
2.Long term exposure to general conditions may exert generalized effects: e.g., urban life style as a function of crowding - people living in crowded places have less trust for others; working day rhythm as function of climate - people who live in warm environments work during the morning and evening rather than during the midday
3.Behavior is oriented toward environment. We can influence the environment (e.g.: plant trees or leave trash around)
The environment as a source of affect:
1.Affect evoked by stimulus characteristics (e.g., complexity, diversity, novelty, category)
2.Environment determines approach and avoidance reactions (moving, migrating, holiday destinations)
3.Adaptation (“man is at once a seeker and neutralizer of stimulation”.
Wohlwill does not mention these important aspects in the paper:
  • Individual differences in, e.g., sensation seeking, environmental concern, etc.
  • Attitude formation and attitude change regarding environmental problems
  • Problems that seem environmental but are primarily social, economic, educational (slums, ghetto’s)

Goldberg, T. (1969). The automobile. A social institution for adolescents. Environment and Behavior, 1, 152-185.

Premises
  • Designers like to think about the relation between physical form and social behavior
  • These insights are based on intuitions rather than on science
  • These insights are often wrong, because:
    • Intuition hardly works
    • The scientific approach is shallow (misses in depth understanding of social processes)
Problem description:
  • Adolescents have nowhere to go
  • They like cars
  • Therefore: They take the road for social gatherings
  • Their problem solving creates problems for others: blocking of roads, creating unsafety, noise annoyance

No follow-up was made to find a solution to this issue

Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182.

Attention Restoration Theory

 

3 components:

  • Directed attention
    • Directed attention requires capacity for inhibition of distraction (inhibitory mechanis
    • When efforts to sustain directed attention are prolonged the inhibitory mechanism becomes exhausted
  • Consequences of attentional fatigue
    • Poor concentration
    • Easily irritated
    • Inclined to make errors
    • Unwilling to help others
  • Restoration
    • Nature can help restore people's attention
    • Being away from your daily life activities 
    • Finding something very interesting
    • Match between what you like to do and the environment provides
    • Feeling like there's enough time/accessibility to enjoy
When people are fatigued, they prefer urban environments less
 

Gosling, S. D. , Ko, S. J. Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 379-398.

Can we deduce personality about a person from the interior of a room?

Utilise cues (Brunswik's lens model)

4 types of cues:

  • Self-directed identity claims (e.g.: souveniers from holidays)
  • Other directed identity claims (e.g.: certificates)
  • Interior behavioral residue (e.g.: piles of paper)
  • Exterior behavior residue (e.g.: umbrella)

Data collection on 3 sources:

  • Observing haracteristics of the room
  • Occupant's and peers of occupant ratings on their personality
  • Observer judgement: personality rating based on what they see in the room

Cue validity:cues that are good predictors for a certain trait

  • ConscientiousnessOrganized, uncluttered, homogeneous collections of books and CD’s
  • Openness to experienceDistinctive, stylish, unconventional
Cue utilization: cues that the observer uses
  • When good cues are used, trait inferences will be more accurate

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.

Environmental problems are problems of overpopulation
  • Population growth should be 0 - a pair produces only 1 child on average
  • Overpopulation has no technical solution
  • The morality of an act is a function of the state of the system at the time it is performed
  • “Flowing water purifies itself every 10 miles”
  • Conscience actions is self-eliminating: if you decide not to have children for moral reasons, you might not be able to pass on this idea to the next generation
  • Mutual coercion that is mutually agreed upon
  • Freedom in a commons is a tragedy to all: common resources e.g. water, are limited
  • Environmental consequences can be long-term and uncertain

Social dilemma: private interest vs environmental interest

  • Behavior A is more advantageous for the individual than behavior B
  • When everybody makes the same choice: behavior B has better outcomes for all individuals collectively than behavior A

Example: driving fast

Pro:

  • Fun: “more in tune with experience driver”
  • Faster home

Con: 

  • Costs: minimum 132 million euro
  • Pollution: CO2, NO2, particulate matter, noise
  • Risk of accidents: increase in number and seriousness

Defection enhanced by:

  • Importance of common good to actor
  • Perception of Abundance
  • Uncertainty
    • Environmental (Is climate change real? How important is it? What are the influences of human behavior?)
    • Social (What do other people do?)

Averting the tragedy of the commons by Van Vugt (2009):

  • Reducing environmental and social uncertainty
  • Improving and broadening one’s sense of community
  • Increasing acceptance of commons rules and institutions
  • Punishing overuse and rewarding responsible use

Van der Wal, A.J., Van Horen, F., Grinstein, A. (2018). Temporal myopia in sustainable behavior under uncertainty. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35, 378-393.

Shows how the environment itself can influence sustainable behavior
 
Intervention technique being used based on evolutionary psychological theory to enhance sustainable behavior

Life history theory

  • People adopt a faster life strategy
  • People become more focused on immediate outcomes
  • Sustainable behavior is a slow life strategy
  • Sustainable behavior holds a strong future component

If you want to get people engaged, focus on the immediate consequences and don't phrase things in terms of the future

Kotler, P. (2011). Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. Journal of Marketing, 75, 132-135

1997: Marketing: "an act or practice of advertising and selling a product”
2008: “Marketing is the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating, communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for consumers, clients, partners, and society at large” 
 
Marketers view in the past was that wants are natural and infinite, and encouraging unlimited consumption is good. Also, nature's resources are infinate
 
Sustainable marketers' view:
  • Wants are culturally influenced and strongly shaped by marketing and other forces
  • The earth’s resources are finite and fragile
  • The earth’s carrying capacity for waste and pollution is very limited
  • Quality of life and personal happiness do not always increase with more consumption and want satisfaction

Consumers steer sustainable marketing:

Dimensions for choosing a product/brand

  • Functional (Marketing 1.0)
  • Emotional (Marketing 2.0)
  • Social responsibility (Marketing (3.0)

The four P's of sustainable marketing

 

Product:
  • Questioning the necessity of new products
  • Source of the materials and their carbon footprints
  • Packaging: biodegradable and disposable
Price:
  • Environmentally involved customers may be willing to pay more
  • Pricing will be affected by possible new regulations
Place:
  • More locally based production
  • Online selling to reduce the amount of consumer driving
Promotion:
  • Shift promotion from print to online
  • Communicate their commitment to sustainability
  • Product labeling: specify ingredients and their carbon footprints

 

Conclusion:

  • Marketers should recognize finite resources and high environmental costs
  • Marketers need to revise their policies on product development, pricing, distribution, and branding
  • Companies must balance more carefully their growth goals with the need to pursue sustainability
 
Environmental Psychology 2 - Urban environment

Environmental Psychology 2 - Urban environment

Environmental Psychology elective at Leiden University (2020-2021)

Lecture 2: Going Into Town (the urban environment)

Pros and cons of living in an urban environment

+ More employment opportunity 

+Cities are exciting, lively and diverse

+More cultural, educational and medical resources

- Crowdedness, information overload. 

- High density

-Pollution

-Crime

Crowdedness and density

  • Crowding is a personally defined, subjective feeling that too many others are around
  • Density: people per square meter. Not identical to the subjective state of crowdedness
  • Proximity to others can have even more adverse effects than density because of personal space invasion. Example: having to sit next to people on the train.
    • Study about this phenomena: Evans, G.W., & Wener, R.E. (2007). Crowding and personal space invasion on the train: Please don't make me sit in the middle.
  • Crowding became interpreted and studied as a specific stressor, involving:
    • Antecedents
    • Affective reaction
    • Behavorial response

Antecedents

Presence of too many others causes:
  • Goal blocking (traffic jam, waiting in line)
  • Threat of resource loss (food, shelter)
  • Loss of control (unwanted interaction)

Affective reaction:

  • Anger, annoyance  (predominantly negative)
  • Physiological reactions indicating increased arousal and stress

Behavioral response:

  • Withdrawal, avoidance
  • Filtering out information
  • Changing social environment by increased selectivity in social contacts, creating norms
  • Changing physical environment by partitioningspace, putting up fences, curtains etc.

How to deal with crowding?

  • Residences: e.g. installing screens or walls
  • Amusement parks: queuing devices

  • Campings: zoning (grouping of like minded people)

  • Prisons: huge differences between one- and more-person cells. Size is relatively unimportant. So, it is better to have one person cells, even if they are smaller

Information overload

Article on information overload in cities: Milgram (1970). The experience of living in cities.

Wirth’s (1938) sociological definition of city: large numbers, high density, heterogeneity
 
Psychological translation in Information overload (inability to process input, too many or too fast)
 
Adaptive responses:
  • Decrease time per input
  • Ignore low-priority input
  • Shift to a more passive approach
  • Impede access

Change in social responsibility:

Study: Allow strangers in the home; as a function of city size and gender (DV=% access allowed):

        City  Small town
♂      14        50
♀      40        93
  • Civility: less or different in character in cities
  • Anonymity: blessing or curse? Anonymity makes people trust eachother less, but there is also less social pressure on people (less gossiping etc)

Article: Moser, G., & Corroyer, D. (2001). Politeness in the urban environment: Is city life still synonymous with civility?:

  • Slightly different premise: Civility is an urban phenomenon
  • Tacit rules
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Environmental Psychology 3 - Nature

Environmental Psychology 3 - Nature

Environmental Psychology elective at Leiden University (2020-2021)

Lecture 3: Nature (taking a break)

People have been recommended to go to onature for its well-being effects since (at least) the 19th century

Epidemological research: understanding what factors determin a large population to get sick

De Vries et al., 2003. Natural Environments—Healthy Environments? An Exploratory Analysis of the Relationship between Greenspace and Health

  • Representative sample of Dutch population (N = 17.000)
  • Result: significant positive relationship between presence of green in neighbourhood and self reported health

Takano et al., 2002. Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable green spaces

  • Japanese longitudinal study, older inhabitants Tokio (N= 3144)
  • Results: significant positive relationship between presence of ‘ walkable green’ and lower mortality within 5 years

Video demonstrating how green spaces improve well-being: https://vimeo.com/83228781

  • Green spaces improve mental health short-term and long-term as well

Biophilia theory:

There is an innnate emotional affiliation of human beings to other living organisms. It likely evolved while hunter-gatherers were living in, with, and of nature. That is why natural landscapes are intrinsically rewarding and enjoyable.

Two theories about recovery effect of nature:

1. Psycho-evolutionary or so-called stressreduction theory (Ulrich, 1984):
  • Perception of nature causes reduction of negative feelings and psychophysiological recovery of stress

2. Attention restoration theory (Kaplan, 1995):

  • Perception of nature causes recovery of attentional fatigue

Lederbogen, F. et al.,2011. City living and urban upbringing affect neural social stress processing in humans

  • Growing world’s population now lives in cities
  • Creating a healthy urban environment is important
  • Cities negatively affect mental health
  • Mood and anxiety disorders are more prevalent
  • Incidence of schizophrenia is higher

What neural processes can explain this relation?

  • Activation of amygdala (indicator of stress)
  • Activation of perigenual anterior cingulate cortex (pACC; indicator of stress regulation)

Conclusion of study: People living in cities can not cope as well with social stress as people living more rural; especially with a childhood raised in urban areas

Bratman et al., 2015. Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation

  • After a 90-minute walk participants of the nature walk, compared to the urban walk, reported less rumination, and also their brains showed less activity in pACC

Ulrich, R.,1984. View through a window may influence recovery.

  • Archival study of 46 patients recovering from gallbladder surgery (records from 1972 to 1981)
  • “Treatment”: assignment to room with wall view or nature view
  • Patients matched on age, gender, smoking, obesity, hospitalization history, floor level, room color
  • Findings: 

                                                                          Nature           

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Environmental Psychology 4 -Spatial planning and design

Environmental Psychology 4 -Spatial planning and design

Environmental Psychology elective at Leiden University (2020-2021)

Lecture 4: Spatial planning and design

Environmental perception

Compared to traditional perception research:

  • Perceiver is in the scene
  • Perceiver is purposive, has a plan
  • Stimuli are complex (Berleyne’s three classes of stimulus properties):
  1. Psychophysical: intensity of stimulation, brightness of colors, volume of sound
  2. Ecological: indicative of positive or negative environmental conditions for people
  3. Collative stimulus properties

Collative stimulus properties

Properties based on comparisons between elements in the stimulus field:
  • Order=e.g.:symmetry
  • Complexity
  • Diversity =organized complexity
Properties based on comparisons between succession of stimuli:
  • Newness
  • Surprisingness

Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S.,1989. The experience of nature. A psychological perspective

                                 BASIC NEEDS

                  Understanding      Exploration
---------------------------------------------

Immediate  Coherence             Diversity

Inferred,       Legibility                 Mystery
Predicted

Coherence: A coherent scene is orderly: it hangs together
Diversity: The number of different elements in a scene: its richness
Legibility: A well-structured space with distinctive elements, so that it is easy both to find one’s way within the scene and to find one’s way back to the starting point
Mystery: The promise of further information if one could walk deeper into the scene

Territoriality 

Pattern of behavior and attitudes based on perceived, attempted or actual control of a definable physical space, involving occupation, defense, personalization, and marking
 
Types of terriroriality:
  • Primary (home, or spaces within home (e.g. bedroom)
  • Secondary (office, lobby, stairway, elevator)
  • Public (park, sidewalk, beach, parking place)
Effects of terriroriality/ownership
  • Infringement (invasion, violation, contamination) and defense (preventative reaction)
  • Warding off crime (defensible space), creating social order, improve maintenance (e.g. ‘adoption’ of neighbourhood park, playground, highway)

 Applications in design and management for public territory

Neighbourhoods: increased ownership --> improved safety, reduced noise and air pollution, made surveillance easier
Hospitals: increased personalization --> increased wellbeing, faster recovery
 

Kaplan, R. & Austin, M. E., 2004. Out in the country: sprawl and the quest for nature nearby

  • People like to live near nature
  • On an aggregate level this causes urban sprawl and the destruction of nature
  • So for people moved to live “out in the country”, what were the main reasons?

Research questions:

  • Which kind of nature is specifically liked?
  • How important is nature for community satisfaction?
  • Is there a way to solve the dilemma, make solutions more environmentally sustainable

Conclusion of research:

  • Forest is most important satisfier of “living out in the country”
  • Having a forest nearby is more satisfying
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Environmental Psychology 5 - Acting Green

Environmental Psychology 5 - Acting Green

Environmental Psychology elective at Leiden University (2020-2021)

Lecture 5: Acting green - sustainable behavior

Evolutionary perspective:

  • Evolutionary perspective, focusing on:
    • Ultimate vs proximate explanations
    • Stone Age Brain in 21th century world
  • Survival and reproduction
    • Not of individuals but of genes
  • Manifest in 5 “ancestral” tendencies
  • Important to understand, also for effective interventions

Five “ancestral” tendencies:

1. Propensity for self-interest

  • Ensure survival and replication of genes of self and family (inclusive fitness)
  • Reciprocal altruism (in small, stable, interdependent groups)

2. Desire for relative status

  • Costly signaling: spending --> resourceful -->attraction
  • Competitive altruism/environmentalism: sacrificing  increases status (visibility important) --> attraction

Example of status and self-interest: desire to plant trees is increased when name tag (of person who planted) is placed on the tree

Paradox of green to be seen by Van der Wal, Van Horen, and Grinstein (2016):

  • Public signaling: Shopping at Ekoplaza vs. Marqt
  • Ekoplaza (intrinsic motivation: environment)
  • Marqt (extrinsic motivation: status)
  • Finding: much more people bought Marqt bag than Ekoplaza bag

3. Unconsciously copying the behavior of others

  • Adaptive value in the many situations where trial and error is too costly
  • Effective for change when majority is seen to go along
  • Humans are disposed to imitate those who are perceived as leaders

Social norms and hotel towels by Goldstein, Cialdini, and Griskevicius (2008)

What has more affect on peopoles' behavior when it comes to reusing a towel?

  • INDUSTRY STANDARD: "HELP SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT. You can show your respect for nature and help save the environment by reusing your towels during your stay."
  • SOCIAL NORM: JOIN YOUR FELLOW GUESTS IN HELPING TO SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT. Almost 75% of the guests help the environment by reusing their towels. Help save the environment by reusing your towels yourself during your stay.

  • The "social norm" message was much more effective'

4. Following the present over the future

  • Temporal discounting: people in general discount the future. So, emphasis should be on direct benefit

5. Disregarding impalpable concerns

  • Difficult to appreciate environmental problems when there are no clear sensory (visual, audible, olfactory) cues. E.g.: problems that are not appearant in your immesdiate environment seem less important

Factors that influence behavior

  • Information: beliefs, attitudes, values
  • Behavior of others : normative pressure
  • Financial regulation, legislation, physical change: change in beliefs about behavioral outcomes

Theory of Planned Behavior:Theory in which attitudinal, normative and control beliefs are modeled to predict behavior

  • Illustration of Planned Behavior model: http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen
  • Lacking in Planned Behavior model: personal norm
    • Feeling of personal obligation to perform behavior based on internalized values
    • Strong additional predictor for environmental behavior
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Environmental Psychology 6 - Sustainable intervention

Environmental Psychology 6 - Sustainable intervention

Environmental Psychology elective at Leiden University (2020-2021)

Lecture 6: Sustainable interventions

Schultz, P. W., 2014. Strategies for promoting proenvironmental behavior.

Community Based Social Marketing and a strategy for choice of intervention techniques
 
Five principles:
  1. Identify specific behavior
  2. Identify barriers and incentives
  3. Program development
  4. Pilot test
  5. Full scale implementation and evaluation

Providing information/education:

  • Providing insight into the structure of the environmental problems
  • Increasing awareness of need
  • Increasing responsibility
  • Explaining personal benefits
  • Changing social approval, social norm
  • Decreasing social uncertainty
  • Provide procedural information
  • Changing affective meaning of environmental issues (e.g.: it's cool to drive a Tesla)

Direct behavioral information:

PROMPTS (encouragement/reminder)

  • Effective if:
    • Specific
    • In proximity of target behavior
    • Simple behavior (turning of light or water)
    • Friendly
    • Salient (catching attention)

FEEDBACK (information about performed behavior and/or effects of behavior)

  • Effective if:
    • Communicated soon after behavior
    • In meaningful units
    • Compared to relevant standard
    • Goal present

Other types of interventions:

  • Commitment
    • Lokhorst, A. M., Werner, C., Staats, H., van Dijk, E., & Gale, J.   L. (2013). Commitment and behavior change: A meta-analysis   and critical review of commitment-making strategies in environmental research.
  • Modelling: showing people how other people behave sustainably, and what you can do
  • Mobilizing social network (Carbon Conversations)
  • Tailoring (direct your message as specific as possible to the target)

Staats, H., Harland, P., & Wilke, H. A., 2004. Effecting durable change: A team approach to improve environmental behavior in the household

  • EcoTeam approach to improve environmental behavior in the household
    • An intervention package of information, feedback and social support, preferably in a group setting
    • Competence building, intrinsic motivation, trying without risk
  • Mobilizing social networks
  • Governmental support

EcoTeam Program:

Structured action program for environmental behavior in the household

Three components:

  • Workbook: background information and specific behavioral advice
  • Feedback: information about the effects of previously performed behavior
  • EcoTeam: support, information, social comparison
Research question: What element (information, feedback, social influence) of the ETP influences behavior change most?

Findings/Conclusion:

  • Social influence is the only factor that can buffer the negative effect of strong car use habits
  • EcoTeam Program is a demanding program with extraordinary sustainable behavioral changes and savings
  • EcoTeam Program manages to keep prior sustainable intentions “alive” (despite the non-sustainable habits), due to social influence of the Team

Poortinga, W., & Whitaker, L., 2018. Promoting the use of reusable coffee cups through environmental messaging, the provision of alternatives and financial incentives

Problem of disposable coffee cups (in UK)

    .....read more
    Access: 
    Public
    Comments, Compliments & Kudos:

    Add new contribution

    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Image CAPTCHA
    Enter the characters shown in the image.
    Promotions
    vacatures

    JoHo kan jouw hulp goed gebruiken! Check hier de diverse studentenbanen die aansluiten bij je studie, je competenties verbeteren, je cv versterken en een bijdrage leveren aan een tolerantere wereld

    Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org


    Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams

    Using and finding summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter

    There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.

    1. Starting Pages: for some fields of study and some university curricula editors have created (start) magazines where customised selections of summaries are put together to smoothen navigation. When you have found a magazine of your likings, add that page to your favorites so you can easily go to that starting point directly from your profile during future visits. Below you will find some start magazines per field of study
    2. Use the menu above every page to go to one of the main starting pages
    3. Tags & Taxonomy: gives you insight in the amount of summaries that are tagged by authors on specific subjects. This type of navigation can help find summaries that you could have missed when just using the search tools. Tags are organised per field of study and per study institution. Note: not all content is tagged thoroughly, so when this approach doesn't give the results you were looking for, please check the search tool as back up
    4. Follow authors or (study) organizations: by following individual users, authors and your study organizations you are likely to discover more relevant study materials.
    5. Search tool : 'quick & dirty'- not very elegant but the fastest way to find a specific summary of a book or study assistance with a specific course or subject. The search tool is also available at the bottom of most pages

    Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?

    Quicklinks to fields of study (main tags and taxonomy terms)

    Field of study

    Access level of this page
    • Public
    • WorldSupporters only
    • JoHo members
    • Private
    Statistics
    1894