Bar-Tal (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. - Article summary
There are several characteristics of an intractable conflict:
- Protracted
The conflict persists for at least a generation. - Violent
The conflict involves physical violence in which society members are killed and wounded in either wars (1), small-scale military engagements (2) or terrorist attacks (3). - Perceived as irresolvable
The conflict involves the perception that it is impossible to resolve it peacefully. - Demand extensive investment
The participants of the conflict make vast material and psychological investments to cope with the situation. - Total
The conflict is a total conflict. It is perceived as being about essential and basic goals, needs or values that are seen as indispensable for the society’s existence (e.g. the conflict often involves issues of territory, self-determination, statehood, economy, religion or culture). - Perceived as zero-sum in nature
The conflict does not include compromises and adheres to the original goals. The loss of the other party is seen as a gain. - Central
The conflict occupies a central place in the lives of the individual society members and the society as a whole.
The seven features fluctuate in intensity over time. The longevity of the conflict results in both parties accumulating animosity and hostility. The consequences of violence are seen as a problem of society and thus the society takes the responsibility to treat and compensate victims to prevent reoccurrence of the violence.
Adaptation to the intractable conflict requires satisfying needs that remain deprived during intractable conflict (e.g. need for safety) (1), requires that people learn to cope with stress (2) and requires the development of psychological conditions that will be lead people to attempt to withstand the conflict (3).
The socio-psychological infrastructure in intractable conflict consists of collective memories (1), ethos of conflict (2) and collective emotional orientation (3).
Societal beliefs refer to cognitions shared by society members on topics and issues that are of special concern for their society and contribute to their sense of uniqueness. The content of societal beliefs refer to characteristics (1), structures (2) and processes occurring in society (3) and cover different domains of societal life. The societal beliefs provide a basis for common understanding of reality (1), good communication (2), interdependence (3) and the coordination of social activities (4). The societal beliefs constitute the perceived common element in the reality of the society members.
Collective memory evolves to present the history of the conflict to society members. These memories do not intend to provide an objective history of the past (1) and are shared and treated as a truthful account of the history of the society (2). The collective memories provide a black and white picture which enables parsimonious, fast, unequivocal and simple understanding of the history of the conflict.
The societal beliefs of collective memory justify the outbreak of the conflict (1), present a positive image of the in-group (2), delegitimize the opponent (3) and present’s one’s society as the victim of the opponent (4).
Ethos refers to a narrative about the present. It refers to the configuration of shared central societal beliefs that provide a particular dominant orientation to a society at present and for the future. It connects members of society between the present and the goals and aspirations of the future.
The ethos of conflict gives a general orientation and direction and provides a clear picture of the conflict, its goals, its conditions requirements and images of the in-group society and of the rival.
The challenges of the intractable conflict lead to the development of eight themes that comprise the ethos of conflict:
- Societal beliefs about the justness of own goals.
- Societal beliefs about security
- Societal beliefs of positive collective self-image.
- Societal beliefs of own victimization.
- Societal beliefs of delegitimizing the opponent
- Societal beliefs of patriotism
- Societal beliefs of unity
- Societal beliefs of peace
The collective memory and the ethos of conflict complement each other. Societies involved in intractable conflict tend to be dominated by a number of collective emotional orientations (e.g. collective fear orientation and collective hatred).
The sociopsychological infrastructure (i.e. societal beliefs of collective memory and of ethos of conflict) has several functions:
- It fulfils the need of illuminating the conflict situation (i.e. meaning making and coping with stress).
- It serves to justify the acts of the in-group toward the enemy.
- It creates a sense of differentiation and superiority (i.e. sharpens intergroup differences).
- It prepares society members to be ready for threatening and violent acts of the enemy and difficult life conditions.
- It motivates for solidarity, mobilization and action.
- It fulfils the role of contributing to the formation, maintenance and strengthening of a social identity that reflects the last conditions and experiences of the intractable conflict.
Social identity combines identifications with different groups. The formation of social identity is based on a self-categorization process in which individuals group themselves cognitively as belonging to the same social category. Intractable conflict affects social identity. In times of conflict, people tend to increase their sense of identification with the society (1), social identity supplies strength to society members (2) and enhanced social identity provides the basis for unity, solidarity and coordination needed to cope with the conflict (3). When social identity is dominated by meanings that provide ethos of conflict and collective memory, it supports the continuation of the conflict.
The process of institutionalization of the sociopsychological infrastructure is characterized by extensive sharing (1), wide application (2), expression in cultural products (3) and appearance in educational materials (4).
Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>
Concept of JoHo WorldSupporter
JoHo WorldSupporter mission and vision:
- JoHo wants to enable people and organizations to develop and work better together, and thereby contribute to a tolerant and sustainable world. Through physical and online platforms, it supports personal development and promote international cooperation is encouraged.
JoHo concept:
- As a JoHo donor, member or insured, you provide support to the JoHo objectives. JoHo then supports you with tools, coaching and benefits in the areas of personal development and international activities.
- JoHo's core services include: study support, competence development, coaching and insurance mediation when departure abroad.
Join JoHo WorldSupporter!
for a modest and sustainable investment in yourself, and a valued contribution to what JoHo stands for
- Login of registreer om te kunnen reageren
- 1581 keer gelezen
Political Psychology - Article summary [UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM]
- Login of registreer om te kunnen reageren
- 2752 keer gelezen
Political Psychology - Summary [UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM]
- Login of registreer om te kunnen reageren
- 2471 keer gelezen
Political Psychology - Article summary [UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM]
- Hammack & Pilecki (2012). Narrative as a root metaphor for Political Psychology - Article summary
- Van Zomeren, Spears, Fischer, & Leach (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy - Article summary
- Wright, Taylor, & Moghaddam (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. - Article summary
- Deaux, Reid, Martin, & Bikmen (2006). Ideologies of diversity and inequality: Predicting collective action in groups varying in ethnicity and immigrant status - Article summary
- Klandermans, van der Toorn, & van Stekelenburg (2008). Embeddedness and Identity: How immigrants turn grievances into action. - Article summary
- Reicher (1996). 'The battle of Westminster': Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. - Article summary
- Reicher (2016). "La beauté est dans la rue". Four reasons (or perhaps five) to study crowds. - Article summary
- Feddes, Mann, & Doosje (2015). Increasing self-esteem and empathy to prevent violent radicalization: a longitudinal quantitative evaluation of a resilience training focused on adolescents with a dual identity. - Article summary
- Heath-Kelly (2012). Counter-terrorism and the counterfactual: Producing the radicalisation discourse and the UK PREVENT strategy. - Article summary
- Pyszczynski et al. (2006). Mortality salience, martyrdom, and military might: The great satan versus the axis of evil - Article summary
- Webber et al. (2018). The road to extremism: Field and experimental evidence that significance loss-induced need for closure fosters radicalization - Article summary
- Bar-Tal (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. - Article summary
- Halperin (2008). Group-based hatred in intractable conflict in Israel. - Article summary
- Mastroianni (2015). Obedience in perspective: Psychology and the holocaust - Article summary
- Strauss (2007). What is the relationship between hate radio and violence? Rethinking Rwanda's 'radio machete'. - Article summary
- Cehajic, Brown, & Castano (2008). Forgive and forget? Antecedents and consequences of intergroup forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. - Article summary
- Hornsey & Wohl (2013). We are sorry: Intergroup apologies and their tenuous link with intergroup forgiveness. - Article summary
- Hornsey et al. (2017). Conservatives are more reluctant to give and receive apologies than liberals - Article summary
- Rimé et al. (2011). The impact of gacaca tribunals in Rwanda: Psychosocial effects of participation in a truth and reconciliation process after a genocide." "Cho (2013). Campaign tone, political affect and communicative engagement. - Article summary
- Cho (2013). Campaign tone, political affect and communicative engagement. - Article summary
- Marcus, MacKuen, & Neuman (2011). Parsimony and complexity: Developing and testing theories of affective intelligence. - Article summary
- Lecheler, Schuck, & de Vreese (2013). Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects. - Article summary
- Stolwijk, Schuck, & de Vreese (2016). How anxiety and enthusiasm help explain the bandwagon effect. - Article summary
- Political Psychology - Summary [UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM]
Work for JoHo WorldSupporter?
Volunteering: WorldSupporter moderators and Summary Supporters
Volunteering: Share your summaries or study notes
Student jobs: Part-time work as study assistant in Leiden

Contributions: posts
Political Psychology - Article summary [UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM]
This bundle contains everything you need to know for the course "Political Psychology" taught at the University of Amsterdam. It contains the following articles:
- "Hammack & Pilecki (2012). Narrative as a root metaphor for Political Psychology".
- "Van
- Login of registreer om te kunnen reageren
- 3645 keer gelezen
WorldSupporter insurances for backpackers, digital nomads, interns, students, volunteers or working abroad:
Search only via club, country, goal, study, topic or sector
Select any filter and click on Search to see results









