![Image](https://www.worldsupporter.org/sites/default/files/styles/medium/public/bundle/wereldbol_summaries_joho_single_boek_1_150x190px_0.png?itok=PgQm9J5z)
Affective phenomena (emotions, mood and affect) have a long research and theorizing history. The issues are complex and subject to controversy. Therefore, there is an overwhelming amount of literature present, which one should dig into deeply before being able to understand and contribute to this subject. This paper focuses on measurement in sport and exercise psychology.
Which three steps should one consider when choosing a measure?
The first step you should take when measuring something in the domain of affective phenomena, is choosing which construct you are going to target: emotion, mood or core affect. Secondly, you should choose which of many theoretical models you’re going to adhere to. Only then you evaluate the psychometric information (whether a measure meets the criteria for reliability and validity).
What are the differences between affect, emotion and mood?
Core affect is a neurophysiological state consciously accessible as a simple primitive non-reflective feeling. Core affect is constantly experienced, although the nature and intensity of affect may vary over time. It can be a component of emotions and moods, but can also occur solemnly. Examples are pleasure and displeasure, tension and relaxation.
Emotions are a complex set of interrelated sub-events concerned with a specific object. People often show behavior that fits with the emotion they are experiencing. Emotions are elicited by something, reactions to something and are generally about something. Therefore, the cognitive appraisal between the person and the object causing the emotion is seen as a defining element.
Moods lasts longer than emotions and there are not as specific. Also, the cause of a mood may not always be easy to identify.
It is important to keep these differences in mind when choosing a measure for your research because these different concepts should be measured in different ways.
You also have two different approaches: the distinct-states approach and the dimensional approach. According to the distinct-states approach, each state is a distinct entity. It therefore focuses on the unique features of the different states. However, some researchers say that the states are not completely independent. They propose underlying dimensions and came up with the dimensional approach. There are two accepted dimensional models:
The circumplex model (Russell, 1980) which is based on the idea that the affective states can be placed in a model with two axes: the affective valence and the perceived activation.
The two-dimensional solution (Zevon & Tellegen, 1982; Watson & Tellegen, 1985) proposes two axes: high-activation pleasant affect and low-activation unpleasant affect.
These models are variants of one another, not fundamentally different. However, the last model caused much confusion in the literature because of the naming of the dimensions. Therefore, Thayer (1989) proposed a third variant with the axes energetic arousal (energy-tiredness) and tense arousal (tension-calmness). These models all explain plenty of variance in the core affect dimension (which it is limited to).
Watson and Tellegen (1985) understood the limitations of dimensional models, and therefore proposed that the affective domain should be seen as having a hierarchical structure. Broad dimensions can be captured by these models, but the distinct-states approach is required to examine uniqueness. We can conclude from this that both the distinct-states and dimensional approach can be used, and which one is more suitable depends on the aim of the study.
What specific measures can be used?
To say something about affective responses, an increasing number of studies employ psychophysiological measures. We will briefly mention the different categories and measures that are often used.
Single-item dimensional measures of affect
Single-item measures are short to take. They therefore minimize the impact it has on participants. On the other hand, since it only measures one response (which could be erroneous) they tend to be less reliable than multi-item measures. Some famous single-item tests are:
The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM; Bradley & Lang, 1994; Lang, 1980)
The Affect Grid (AG; Russell, Weiss, & Mendelsohn, 1989) based on Russell’s circumplex model of affect.
Feeling Scale (FS; Hardy & Rejeski, 1989)
The Felt Arousal Scale (FAS; Svebak & Murgatroyd, 1985)
Multi-item measures of distinct mood states
Multi-item measures take longer to administer than single-item measures. As a consequence, people can get tired from taking the test and may cause reactivity to the testing. However, they are less susceptible to error. Two multi-item tests are:
Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist (MAACL; Zuckerman & Lubin, 1965)
Profile of Mood States (POMS; McNair et al., 1971)
Multi-item dimensional measures of affect
Dimensional measures were developed in order to capture a global domain, and therefore measure multiple dimensions that are supposed to underlie this domain.
One example of a multi-item dimensional measure of affect is the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson et aI., 1988). However, this test has two big limitations: 1) the items represent a mixture of emotions, moods and affects and 2) there seems to be an inconsistency between the conceptual model that formed the basis and the actual content and structure of the test.
Another dimensional test is the Activation Deactivation Adjective Check list (AD ACL; Thayer, 1989) which measures energetic arousal and tense arousal. Also, a measure that has a similar structure as the AD ACL is recently developed and is called the Four-Dimension Mood Scale (4DMS; Gregg & Shepherd, 2009). This last test may be more sensitive to the effects of physical exercise.
Multi-item measures of specific emotions
Anxiety is the emotion that received the most attention in exercise psychology. The most frequent test used to measure this emotion is the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; Spielberger, Gorsuch, & Lushene, 1970; Spielberger, 1983). This test measures both state anxiety (characterized by subjective and consciously experienced thoughts and feelings) and trait anxiety (seen as a personality trait). Despite its popularity, the STAI received some criticism as well.
Multi-item measures of specific moods
In exercise psychology, research on specific moods has focused on depression. Measures like the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck, Steer, & Garbin, 1988) and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD; Hamilton, 1960) are used most of the time.
Exercise-specific measures of affect
Researchers of exercise psychology found that because of the unique stimulus that exercise is, it should be measured in a different way than by the domain-general measures of affect. Therefore, the Exercise-Induced Feeling Inventory (EPI; Gauvin & Rejeski, 1993), the Subjective Exercise Experiences Scale (SEES; McAuley & Courneya, 1994), and the Physical Activity Affect Scale (PAAS; Lox, Jackson, Tuholski, Wasley, & Treasure, 2000) were developed. However, these measures lack an underlying theory and the items are based on a non-representative sample.
What should researchers and practitioners pay attention to?
As mentioned earlier, the study of mood, emotion and affect is not simple. A very long research history, literature collection and measurement methods are available. The challenge for any researcher in this field is to completely understand all possibilities and make an informed choice for their own research. One should at all times follow the three-step plan provided in this chapter and the rationale for each decision should be outlined in your research paper. For a complete overview of all mentioned tests in this chapter, you can take a look at table 28.1 in which all self-reporting measures are summarized.
JoHo can really use your help! Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world
![Image](https://www.worldsupporter.org/sites/default/files/styles/medium/public/bundle/wereldbol_summaries_joho_single_boek_1_150x190px_0.png?itok=PgQm9J5z)
Study guide with articlesummaries for Emotion and Cognition at Leiden University - 2020/2021
Articlesummaries with Emotion and Cognition at Leiden University
Table of content
- Heart Rate Variability as an Index of Regulated Emotional Responding
- Mimicking emotions
- What is an Animal Emotion?
- Perspectives from affective science on understanding the nature of emotion
- Emotional Expressions Beyond Facial Muscle Actions
- Emotion Processing Deficits: A Liability Spectrum - Kret & Ploeger
- Bonobos (Pan Paniscus) show an attentional bias towards conspecificss - Kret, Jaasma, Bionda, & Wijnen
- Bodily Influences on Emotional Feelings
- Emotion’s Response Patterns
- Bodily Maps of Emotions
- Cognitive reappraisal of emotion: a meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies
- Human feelings: why are some more aware than others?
- The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex
- A theory of unconscious thought
- Affect, Mood, and Emotion
- Impaired Theory of Mind for Moral Judgment in High-Functioning Autism
- Psychopathy and instrumental aggression: Evolutionary, neurobiological, and legal perspectives
- The rol of emotion in moral psychology
- Pupil Mimicry Correlates with Trust
- Mood-dependent Memory: Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- The autonomic nervous system and emotion
- Emotions as a mechanism for boundedly rational agents: The fast and frugal way
- Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes
- How do emotion and motivation direct executive control?
- 1 of 2159
- next ›
Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams
- Check out: Register with JoHo WorldSupporter: starting page (EN)
- Check out: Aanmelden bij JoHo WorldSupporter - startpagina (NL)
Using and finding summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter
There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.
- Use the menu above every page to go to one of the main starting pages
- Starting pages: for some fields of study and some university curricula editors have created (start) magazines where customised selections of summaries are put together to smoothen navigation. When you have found a magazine of your likings, add that page to your favorites so you can easily go to that starting point directly from your profile during future visits. Below you will find some start magazines per field of study
- Use the topics and taxonomy terms
- The topics and taxonomy of the study and working fields gives you insight in the amount of summaries that are tagged by authors on specific subjects. This type of navigation can help find summaries that you could have missed when just using the search tools. Tags are organised per field of study and per study institution. Note: not all content is tagged thoroughly, so when this approach doesn't give the results you were looking for, please check the search tool as back up
- Check or follow your (study) organizations:
- by checking or using your study organizations you are likely to discover all relevant study materials.
- this option is only available trough partner organizations
- Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
- by following individual users, authors you are likely to discover more relevant study materials.
- Use the Search tools
- 'Quick & Easy'- not very elegant but the fastest way to find a specific summary of a book or study assistance with a specific course or subject.
- The search tool is also available at the bottom of most pages
Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?
- Check out: Why and how to add a WorldSupporter contributions
- JoHo members: JoHo WorldSupporter members can share content directly and have access to all content: Join JoHo and become a JoHo member
- Non-members: When you are not a member you do not have full access, but if you want to share your own content with others you can fill out the contact form
Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance
Field of study
- All studies for summaries, study assistance and working fields
- Communication & Media sciences
- Corporate & Organizational Sciences
- Cultural Studies & Humanities
- Economy & Economical sciences
- Education & Pedagogic Sciences
- Health & Medical Sciences
- IT & Exact sciences
- Law & Justice
- Nature & Environmental Sciences
- Psychology & Behavioral Sciences
- Public Administration & Social Sciences
- Science & Research
- Technical Sciences
Add new contribution