Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Article summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- 2411 reads
Foster (2010). Causal inference and developmental psychology.” – Article summary
The problem of causality is difficult in developmental psychology, as many questions of that field regard factors that a person cannot be randomly assigned to (e.g. single parent family). Causal inference refers to the study and measurement of cause-and-effect relationships outside of random assignment.
In the current situation in developmental psychology, it is unclear among researchers whether causality can be implied and why. Causal inferences are necessary for the goals of developmental psychology because causal inferences can improve the lives of people (1), can help distinguish between associations and causal claims for laypeople (2) and causal thinking is unavoidable (3).
The directed acyclic graph (DAG) is a tool which is useful in moving from associations to causal relationships. It is particularly useful in identifying covariates and understanding the anticipated consequences of incorporating these variables.
The DAG is a symbolic representation of dependencies among variables. The causal Markov assumption states that the absence of a path (in the DAG) implies the absence of a relationship. In the DAG, models that represent data with fewer links are preferred to the more complex (parsimony). If two variables are simultaneously determined, the DAG could incorporate this possibility by treating the two as reflecting a common cause.
Variables (in the DAG) can be related in three ways:
- Z is a common cause of X and Y
In this case, Z needs to be controlled for. - Z is a common effect of X and Y
This is a collider. Conditioning on a collider creates a spurious relationship between X and Y. This relationship can suppress or inflate a true causal effect. - Z mediates the effect of X on Y
Access:
Public
Join WorldSupporter!
Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>
This content is related to:
Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Article summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Summary interim exam 3 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
Check more of topic:
This content is used in:
Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Summary interim exam 3 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics by Andy Field, fifth edition – Summary chapter 6
- Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics by Andy Field, fifth edition – Summary chapter 8
- Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics by Andy Field, fifth edition – Summary chapter 9
- Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics by Andy Field, fifth edition – Summary chapter 11
- Foster (2010). Causal inference and developmental psychology.” – Article summary
- “Pearl (2018). Confounding and deconfounding: Or, slaying the lurking variable.” - Article summary
- “Shadish (2008). Critical thinking in quasi-experimentation.” - Article summary
- “Kievit et al. (2013). Simpson’s paradox in psychological science: A practical guide.” - Article summary
- Dienes (2008). Understanding psychology as a science.” – Article summary
- “Marewski & Olsson (2009). Formal modelling of psychological processes.” - Article summary
- “Dennis & Kintsch (2008). Evaluating theories.” - Article summary
- "Furr & Bacharach (2014). Estimating and evaluating convergent and discriminant validity evidence.” - Article summary
- “Furr & Bacharach (2014). Estimating practical effects: Binomial effect size display, Taylor-Russell tables, utility analysis and sensitivity / specificity.” – Article summary
- “Furr & Bacharach (2014). Scaling.” - Article summary
- “Mitchell & Tetlock (2017). Popularity as a poor proxy for utility.” - Article summary
- “LeBel & Peters (2011). Fearing the future of empirical psychology: Bem’s (2011) evidence of psi as a case study of deficiencies in modal research practice.” - Article summary
Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Article summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- Borsboom & Cramer (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology.
- Borsboom et al. (2016). Kinds versus continua: a review of psychometric approaches to uncover the structure of psychiatric constructs.
- "Cohen on item response theory” – Article summary
- Cohen on the science of psychological measurement” - Article summary
- Coyle (2015). Introduction to qualitative psychological research.” – Article summary
- Dienes (2008). Understanding psychology as a science.” – Article summary
- Dienes (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on?” – Article summary
- Eaton et al. (2014). Toward a model-based approach to the clinical assessment of personality psychopathology.” – Article summary
- Foster (2010). Causal inference and developmental psychology.” – Article summary
- “Furr & Bacharach (2014). Estimating practical effects: Binomial effect size display, Taylor-Russell tables, utility analysis and sensitivity / specificity.” – Article summary
- "Furr & Bacharach (2014). Estimating and evaluating convergent and discriminant validity evidence.” - Article summary
- “Furr & Bacharach (2014). Scaling.” - Article summary
- “Gigerenzer & Marewski (2015). Surrogate science: The idol of a universal method for scientific inference.” - Article summary
- “Halpern (2014). Thinking, an introduction.” - Article summary
- “Kievit et al. (2013). Simpson’s paradox in psychological science: A practical guide.” - Article summary
- “LeBel & Peters (2011). Fearing the future of empirical psychology: Bem’s (2011) evidence of psi as a case study of deficiencies in modal research practice.” - Article summary
- “Marewski & Olsson (2009). Formal modelling of psychological processes.” - Article summary
- “Meltzoff & Cooper (2018). Critical thinking about research: Psychology and related fields.” - Article summary
- “Mitchell & Tetlock (2017). Popularity as a poor proxy for utility.” - Article summary
- “Nosek, Spies, & Motyl (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability.” - Article summary
- “Pearl (2018). Confounding and deconfounding: Or, slaying the lurking variable.” - Article summary
- “Schmittmann et al. (2013). Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena.” - Article summary
- “Simmons, Nelson, & Simonsohn (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.” - Article summary
- “Shadish (2008). Critical thinking in quasi-experimentation.” - Article summary
- “Dennis & Kintsch (2008). Evaluating theories.” - Article summary
- “Van der Maas, Kan, & Borsboom (2014). Intelligence is what the intelligence test measures. Seriously.” – Article summary
- “Willingham (2007). Decision making an deductive reasoning.” – Article summary
Going abroad?
Study with summaries
Contributions: posts
Help other WorldSupporters with additions, improvements and tips
Spotlight: topics
Check the related and most recent topics and summaries:
Activities abroad, study fields and working areas:
Institutions, jobs and organizations:
This content is also used in .....
Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Summary interim exam 3 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains everything you need to know for the fifth interim exam for the course "Scientific & Statistical Reasoning" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains both articles, book chapters and lectures. It consists of the following materials:
...Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Article summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the summaries for the course "Scientific & Statistical Reasoning" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains the following articles:
- “Borsboom & Cramer (2013). Network analysis: An integrative
Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org
Submenu: Summaries & Activities
Follow the author: JesperN
Work for WorldSupporter
JoHo can really use your help! Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world
Statistics
Add new contribution