Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>

“Zucker et al. (2013). Memo outlining evidence for change for gender identity disorder in the DSM-5.” – Article summary

There were several changes from the DSM-4 to DSM-5 with regards to gender identity disorder:

  1. Change the name of gender identity disorder (GID) to gender dysphoria
    This is done because it is less stigmatizing and highlights a conceptual change in the diagnosis.
  2. Decouple the diagnosis of GID from the sexual dysfunctions and place it in a separate chapter
    This is done because there is no clear theoretical overlap and it is less stigmatizing.
  3. Change in the introductory descriptor to the point A criterion
    This was changed because incongruence is a better descriptor because it does not only pertain to the gender binary (1), gender aligns better with people with a sex disorder (2), there is no need to mention a single potential causal mechanism (3) and there is a clearer distinction between transient GD and persistent GD as time has been added to the descriptor (4).
  4. Merging of point A and B criteria from the DSM-IV
    The criteria are merged because the distinction between the two criteria is not supported by factor analytic studies.
  5. For children, the A1 criterion is proposed to be a necessary indicator
    This was changed because there are children who meet all the behavioural signs but do not express a desire to be the other sex.
  6. For children, there are minor wording changes to the diagnostic criteria
    This was changed to simplify the underlying construct.
  7. For adolescents and adults, the proposed diagnostic criteria are polythetic in form and are more detailed
    This was changed to capture a reference to intensity or frequency. The focus now is on a discrepancy between experienced and assigned gender rather than cross-gender identification.
  8. Elimination of sexual attraction specifier for adolescents and adults
    This was changed because sexual attraction only plays a minor role in contemporary treatment protocols or decisions.
  9. For the point B criterion, there is a change in wording to capture distress, impairment and increased risk of suffering and disability
    This was changed because people who are transitioning may only experience distress when their transitioning process is blocked.
  10. Inclusion of a subtype pertaining the presence of a DSD (i.e. intersex)
    This was changed because DSD individuals with gender dysphoria have both similarities and differences with individuals with gender dysphoria with no known DND.
  11. Inclusion of a post-transition specifier
    This was changed because many individuals after transitioning do not meet the criteria set for gender dysphoria anymore.

The old introductory descriptor was a strong and persistent cross-gender identification. The A1 criterion refers to repeatedly stated a desire to be or insistence that one is the other sex. A polythetic form refers to the diagnostic criteria sharing a lot of symptoms among each other which are not essential for diagnosis.

There are several validators of gender dysphoria:

  1. Antecedent validators

    1. Familial aggregation
      There is a hereditary component of gender identity.
    2. Sociodemographic and cultural factors
      There are more males than females with gender dysphoria and occurs across cultures.
    3. Environmental risk factors
      The boys with gender dysphoria have more brothers (1), are born later than their siblings (i.e. fraternal birth order effect) (2) and have a lower birth weight (3).
  2. Concurrent validators
    1. Cognitive, emotional, temperamental and personality correlates
      The boys with gender dysphoria perform more poorly on visual-spatial tasks than on verbal tasks and have a lower physical activity level. The girls with gender dysphoria have higher physical activity levels.
    2. Genetics
      There are no known genes linked to gender dysphoria.
    3. Hormonal factors
      There is mixed evidence regarding abnormalities related to molecular genetics and gender dysphoria.
    4. Neuroanatomy
      There may be differences in neuroanatomy in gender dysphoria (e.g. females identifying as males having more similar ‘male’ brain structures) but there is no consensus.
    5. Cerebral dominance and anthropometrics
      There is an elevated rate of left-handedness in males with gender dysphoria, though it is not sure whether it is diagnostic-specific.
    6. Patterns of comorbidity
      The boys with gender dysphoria have elevated rates of internalizing problems and this is more common than externalizing problems. The rates between internalizing and externalizing problems are more equal for girls with gender dysphoria. There is a higher morbidity and suicide rate for people with gender dysphoria.
  3. Predictive validators
    1. Diagnostic stability
      The persistence rate of gender dysphoria is higher compared to the base rate of gender dysphoria, demonstrating diagnostic stability. Gender-related distress often does not decrease until there is treatment with hormones or surgery.
    2. Course of the condition
      The course of gender dysphoria appears to become more fixed over developmental time with narrowing of plasticity as individuals reach adolescence or adulthood.
    3. Response to treatment
      The successful transition makes the diagnostic criteria not applicable anymore and tends to decrease distress.

People diagnosed with DSD are at a heightened risk for gender dysphoria. Chromosomal females who have been exposed to normal levels of prenatal androgen have an elevated rate of gender dysphoria. This also holds for chromosomal males who are exposed to male-typical prenatal androgen level who are assigned female at birth due to the ambiguity of genitals.

Image

Access: 
Public

Image

Check more of topic:
This content is used in:

Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Interim exam 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)

Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Full course summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)

Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Article overview (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)

Search a summary

Image

 

 

Contributions: posts

Help other WorldSupporters with additions, improvements and tips

Add new contribution

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Image

Spotlight: topics

Check the related and most recent topics and summaries:
Activity abroad, study field of working area:
Institutions, jobs and organizations:
This content is also used in .....

Image

Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org

Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams

How and why would you use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?

  • For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
  • For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
  • For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
  • For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
  • For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.

Using and finding summaries, study notes and practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter

There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.

  1. Use the menu above every page to go to one of the main starting pages
    • Starting pages: for some fields of study and some university curricula editors have created (start) magazines where customised selections of summaries are put together to smoothen navigation. When you have found a magazine of your likings, add that page to your favorites so you can easily go to that starting point directly from your profile during future visits. Below you will find some start magazines per field of study
  2. Use the topics and taxonomy terms
    • The topics and taxonomy of the study and working fields gives you insight in the amount of summaries that are tagged by authors on specific subjects. This type of navigation can help find summaries that you could have missed when just using the search tools. Tags are organised per field of study and per study institution. Note: not all content is tagged thoroughly, so when this approach doesn't give the results you were looking for, please check the search tool as back up
  3. Check or follow your (study) organizations:
    • by checking or using your study organizations you are likely to discover all relevant study materials.
    • this option is only available trough partner organizations
  4. Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
    • by following individual users, authors  you are likely to discover more relevant study materials.
  5. Use the Search tools
    • 'Quick & Easy'- not very elegant but the fastest way to find a specific summary of a book or study assistance with a specific course or subject.
    • The search tool is also available at the bottom of most pages

Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?

Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance

Field of study

Follow the author: JesperN
Work for WorldSupporter

Image

JoHo can really use your help!  Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world

Working for JoHo as a student in Leyden

Parttime werken voor JoHo

Statistics
1891