Comparative Criminal Law Lecture 1
- Lees verder over Comparative Criminal Law Lecture 1
- 1190 keer gelezen
In this bundle you will find all the important lectures and working groups of the course Comparative Criminal Law (2016/2017), Utrecht University.
Comparative Criminal Law: Workgroup 1 (2016/2017)
According to Brants & Franken, the central issue determining whether a criminal process is (predominantly) inquisitorial or adversarial, is the conception of the ideal search for the truth (p. 6 literature reader). Weigend’s article also elaborates on the truth-finding in both systems.
Lecture 2 in the Course Comparative Criminal Law (2016/2017): Police & Interrogation
Comparative Criminal Law, Lecture 3 (14 March 2017), Course Utrecht University (2016/2017)
Topic: Prosecution.
Summary of the Case Law Plonka v. Poland (Week 1), Comparative Criminal Law (2016/2017)
Summary of Case Law: Berghuis, Warden v. Thompkins (Comparative Criminal Law, 2016/2017)
About police interrogation and waiver.
Summary of the Case Law: Salduz v. Turkey (Comparative Criminal Law, 2016/2017)
Access to a lawyer, breach of Article 6(3)(c) European Convention on Human Rights & Fundamental Freedoms
Summary of the Case Law: Miranda v. Arizona (Comparative Criminal Law 2016/2017).
Police interrogation and a breach of the right not to incriminate oneself.
Comparative Criminal Law, Case Law: Bannikova v. Russia (2016/2017), Bachelor 3.
Comparative Criminal Law (2016/2017): Case Law Summary: United States v. Russel
Comparative Criminal Law (Utrecht University, 2016/2017): Working Group 3: Entrapment/incitement.
Comparative Criminal Law Lecture 4: Judicial Decisionmakers
Utrecht University, Bachelor 3 (2016/2017)
Add new contribution