History of present illenss and interviewing about feelings - summary of chapter 5, 6, 7 of the First Interview

The first interview
Morrison, J.


Chapter 5 History of the present illness

You can move to the history of the present illness if there are no major problem areas to discover. Throughout the balance of history taking, listen for other clues that might point the way for further explorations.

Explore the problems that have brought the client into treatment. You might consider the areas of clinical interest you covered during free speech.

It is a convention to label as ‘illness’, whatever brings anyone in for evaluation. All problems have precipitants, symptoms, course, and other features that allow you to suggest an effective plan of action.

The present episode

Concentrate first on the current episode of illness. You need a fund of basic information as to exactly what symptoms you can expect to find in an episode of illness. For this, you need to refer to textbooks and other resources.

Describing symptoms

Learn as much as you can about each symptom your client reports. A symptom is any subjective sensation that makes the client think that something is wrong. Clarify any descriptive terms that are used.

Characterize each symptom as fully as you can. Symptoms can wax and wane with time or changes in the environment. Does the client notice such factors?

Vegetative symptoms

Vegetative symptoms are body functions that are concerned with maintaining health and vigour. Vegetative symptoms include problems with:

Sleep

Either excessive (hypersomnia) or inability to sleep (insomnia). If the client has insomnia, find out what portion of the sleep is affected; 1) early (initial insomnia), this is common 2) middle (interval insomnia), this can be found in PTSD or substance abuse 3) late (terminal insomnia), this is usually associated with more severe mental problems.

Appetite and weight change

You should learn how significant the change has been and whether this was intentional.

Energy level

Diurnal variation of mood

Clients with severe depression often feel worse upon arising and better as the day goes on. Those who are less depressed are more likely to report feeling better early in the day, but depressed by nightfall.

Sexual interest and performance

Sexual functioning usually depends upon the individual’s sense of wellbeing.

These symptoms are found in so many of the serious mental disorders that they serve as a screening tool. Look especially for change from previous normal functioning.

Consequences of illness

Mental disorder can interfere with the entire range of human interaction.

It is important to learn how you client’s illness has affected functioning and relationships because: 1) It may provide your most reliable index of severity 2) The diagnosis of some disorders depends heavily on social consequences 3) You may learn that relatives blame the client for various things, while these can be the effects of mental disorders.

Start with an open-ended question that doesn’t limit information that you might obtain. Be sure to obtain details about any positive answers. Area to explore include: marital/couple, interpersonal,legal, occupational/educational, disability payments, interests and symptoms.

Onset and sequence of symptoms

Establish the timing and sequence of the symptoms. Try to encourage precision about the onset of especially noticeable symptoms. Some clients can’t give a date or an approximation. In this case, try focusing on something the client may have thought about many times. At least try to learn which of your client’s several problems started first.

Stressors

A stressor is any condition or event that seems to cause, precipitate, or worsen a client’s mental health problems. What might be mildly stressful for one person could seem catastrophic to another.

Stressors should have occurred within the year prior to your evaluation. If they took place earlier, they must be a focus of treatment or have contributed to the development of the mental health disorder to count as a current stressor.

Clients often mention stressors during free speech. If they don’t, you will have to ask. A good time for this is right after you have pinned down the onset of the episode of illness. If you find a stressor, try to learn how if affected the course of the illness.

If the client can’t think of any possible stressor, you should run through a list of possibilities, pausing briefly to allow thinking time.

For some episodes of illness you’ll find no stressors at all. To  a client almost anything can seem a possible cause of emotional disorder.

Just because your client identifies something as a stressor, this doesn’t mean that it actually caused the disorder to happen. Often two events simply occur by coincidence.

Try to answer the question: Why does your client appear for evaluation now?

Previous episodes

Knowing about previous episodes of the same or similar mental condition can help you determine diagnosis and prognosis for the future. Ask whether there were previous episodes and how they went.

This information may help you evaluate the severity of the present episode by comparing it with earlier episodes.

Previous treatment

Try to learn everything about previous treatment.

Chapter 6: Getting the facts about present illness

Of all portions of the initial mental health interview, the history of the present illness is probably most important. This is where you develop most of the information and test the hypotheses that provide the basis for your diagnosis. This process requires highly valid information.

Be clear about the goals of your interview

Ideally, your client will understand your expectations for accuracy form the very beginning of the interview.

Your client may appear to be holding back information. Your first task in this case is to try to understand this behaviour.

It sometimes helps to repeat your reassurances about confidentiality.

Track your distractions

When new material interrupts the flow of your interview, you can either pursue it immediately or make a note to come back to it later. If you choose the later, you should acknowledge that your client has said something.

In clinical interviewing, you try to get all the necessary information and avoid the bog of excessive detail.

Use open-ended questions

Above all else, you want information that is valid. Clients give the most valid information when they are allowed to answer freely, in their own words, and as completely as they wish. Whenever possible, phrase your question in an open-ended way that allows the widest possible scope of response.

Talk the client’s language

Guard against using technical words that clients might not understand.

Some clients think they understand something when they don’t. If they answer the question they thought you asked, the information you get might not be accurate. Others are reluctant to admit their ignorance and so say nothing.

You will improve validity if you pitch your questions at a level the client can understand, but be careful not to talk down the client.

You should work hard to be sure that you understand what your client is trying to say. To find out, you can do two things: 1) state your understanding of the expression 2) ask what was meant.

Be careful not to judge other people’s behaviour by your own.

Choose the right probing questions

When you want to know about something, just ask. If you use an open-ended question, you’ll probably get the details.

When it comes time to delve more deeply into your client’s presenting problems, choose probing questions with two principles in mind: 1) select probes that will resolve unanswered questions 2) if your questions show that you know a lot about the illness, you will be perceived as knowledgeable. The resulting dividend of rapport and trust should lead to increased sharing of information.

Questions beginning with ‘Why’ can prove frustrating to a clients who lacks insight. These questions invite speculation rather than facts.

Getting a good history depends in part on knowing what questions will help you better understand the facts about the client’s symptoms or problems. Each symptom has its unique set of details that must be explored. For a full, rich exploration of any behaviour or event, certain items of information are always necessary. These include details about the symptoms’: type, severity, frequency, duration and context.

Because you will be looking for specific details, you will be using more close-ended questions. You should still include some open-ended questions which will stimulate your client to relate additional material you may not have thought to ask about.

It is important to: 1) don’t phrase questions in the negative 2) don’t ask double questions 3) avoid leading questions 4) encourage precisions 5) keep questions brief 6) keep on the lookout for new leads.

Confrontations

Confrontation means pointing out something that requires clarification. The purpose of this is to help you and the client communicate better.

In the usual initial interview, you should try to avoid any confrontation more than a mild one because you don’t know another well at all. If you seem to be getting contradictory information on an important point, try to enhance validity by asking for clarification. When you ask, be gentle.

Whatever the issue, try to restrict your confrontations to one or two essential issues.

To be sure that you reserve this treatment for only the most important issues, it is better to save confrontation until close to the end of the interview 1) The relationship should be better 2) you have obtained most of your information.

Chapter 7: Interviewing about feelings

Feelings about the illness will be among the most important information you obtain during the entire interview.

Negative and positive feelings

You can obtain information about feelings from most normally expressive people just be watching and listening. In some clients you will have to go prospecting to elicit feelings.

Eliciting feelings

Most clients will express their feelings adequately if you just ask. Two techniques are especially good at eliciting emotions: 1) direct request 2) open-ended questions.

Direct request for feelings

Watch for the opportunity to ask about the feelings associated with any of the facts you have been discussing. Asking is the most effective method of eliciting emotions, but be careful to use the word feelings or a synonym.

Open-ended questions

Open-ended questions encourage the free expression of emotions. Its relative freedom encourages clients to speak at length. The more people talk, the more likely they are to reveal emotion-laded information.

This technique suggest that you care about how the client perceives the situation as a whole.

Open-ended questions can help  clients who have trouble sorting out conflicting feelings.

Other techniques

Several situations can make it hard to elicit emotions from clients: 1) from childhood, some people are discouraged from revealing their feelings or displaying emotions 2) some clients don’t recognize their own feeling or have difficulty connecting their feelings to their experiences 3) some may be reluctant to express themselves because it makes them feel vulnerable.

To elicit feelings in some of these situations may require to use such techniques as: 1) expressions of concern of sympathy, this is especially likely to work if the client has already begun to share some feelings. This can be either verbal or behavioural 2) reflection of feelings, explicitly stating the emotion you thing the client might have felt in a given situation 3) picking up on emotional cues, being constantly alert for indications of high emotional concern. Often these will be nonverbal 4) interpretation, drawing parallels between the emotional content of current and past situations. Ideally, the client should be the one who suggests the connection, if not, offer it tentatively.

Analogy

For the client who absolutely cannot identify the feeling that accompany a given situation, you could ask about times when similar feelings might have been experienced.

Following up for details

Once you have uncovered some feelings, increase the depth of the interview by asking for more. Probe to elicit examples and to evaluate details.

Defence mechanisms

You should learn what your client does to cope with feelings. These strategies hare called defence mechanisms. They can be harmful and helpful.

Handling excessively emotional clients

Some clients are so emotional that it impedes their communication. This can be due to a variety of reasons: 1) people why are angry 2) some people have learned that high-volume emotions help them get their way 3) some use high emotional output to control their families or friends 4) some have been rewarded for using emotions 5) anxiety 6) some cannot stand the loneliness of silence 7) a fear for disinterest.

In such a situation, try to adopt a brisk, controlling manner in which you firmly direct the course of the interview: 1) acknowledge the emotion 2) talk quietly. It will be hard for most people to maintain high-volume output when you are speaking so softly you can barely be heard 3) explain again what information you are trying to get 4) redirect any of the clients questions or comments that change the topic 5) switch to a closed-ended style 6) check to be sure that the client understands what you want.

The aim of these techniques is to reduce the client’s scope for excessive verbal and behavioural output.

It these techniques are insufficient, you make have to break off the interview long enough for the client to get a better grip.

Check page access:
Public
Check more or recent content:

Psychodiagnostiek - Master klinische psychologie

History of present illenss and interviewing about feelings - summary of chapter 5, 6, 7 of the First Interview

History of present illenss and interviewing about feelings - summary of chapter 5, 6, 7 of the First Interview

Image

The first interview
Morrison, J.


Chapter 5 History of the present illness

You can move to the history of the present illness if there are no major problem areas to discover. Throughout the balance of history taking, listen for other clues that might point the way for further explorations.

Explore the problems that have brought the client into treatment. You might consider the areas of clinical interest you covered during free speech.

It is a convention to label as ‘illness’, whatever brings anyone in for evaluation. All problems have precipitants, symptoms, course, and other features that allow you to suggest an effective plan of action.

The present episode

Concentrate first on the current episode of illness. You need a fund of basic information as to exactly what symptoms you can expect to find in an episode of illness. For this, you need to refer to textbooks and other resources.

Describing symptoms

Learn as much as you can about each symptom your client reports. A symptom is any subjective sensation that makes the client think that something is wrong. Clarify any descriptive terms that are used.

Characterize each symptom as fully as you can. Symptoms can wax and wane with time or changes in the environment. Does the client notice such factors?

Vegetative symptoms

Vegetative symptoms are body functions that are concerned with maintaining health and vigour. Vegetative symptoms include problems with:

Sleep

Either excessive (hypersomnia) or inability to sleep (insomnia). If the client has insomnia, find out what portion of the sleep is affected; 1) early (initial insomnia), this is common 2) middle (interval insomnia), this can be found in PTSD or substance abuse 3) late (terminal insomnia), this is usually associated with more severe mental problems.

Appetite and weight change

You should learn how significant the change has been and whether this was intentional.

Energy level

Diurnal variation of mood

Clients with severe depression often feel worse upon arising and better as the day goes on. Those who are less depressed are more likely to report feeling better early in the day, but depressed by nightfall.

Sexual interest and performance

Sexual functioning usually depends upon the individual’s sense of wellbeing.

These symptoms are found in so many of the serious mental disorders that they serve as a screening tool. Look especially for change from previous normal functioning.

Consequences of illness

Mental disorder can interfere

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Oude onaangepaste schema's en diagnostiek en voorlichting - samenvatting van een gedeelte uit hoofdstuk 1 en 2 uit Schemagerichte therapie handboek voor therapeuten

Oude onaangepaste schema's en diagnostiek en voorlichting - samenvatting van een gedeelte uit hoofdstuk 1 en 2 uit Schemagerichte therapie handboek voor therapeuten

Image

Schemagerichte therapie Handboek voor therapeuten
Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E..
H1, H2


Oude onaangepaste schema’s

De geschiedenis van het construct schema

Binnen de cognitieve ontwikkeling is een schema een patroon dat over de werkelijkheid of ervering heen wordt gelegd om het individu in staat te stellen: 1) deze te verklaren 2) de perceptie te mediëren 3) reacties te sturen.

Een schema is een abstracte voorstelling van de typerende kenmerking van een gebeurtenis. Het dient als leidraad voor het interpreteren van informatie en het oplossen van problemen.

Schema’s worden steeds verder uitgewerkt en op latere levenservaringen toegepast.

Cognitieve consistentie is het instand houden van een stabiele visie op iemand zelf en de wereld, ook als deze in werkelijkheid onnauwkeurig of vertekend is.

Een schema kan positief of negatief en functioneel of dysfunctioneel zijn. Schema’s kunnen zowel in de kindertijd als in het latere leven ontstaan.

De definitie van een schema volgens Young

Young denkt dat sommige schema’s, met name die zijn ontstaan door schadelijke ervaringen in de kindertijd, de kern uitmaken van persoonlijkheidsstoornissen.

Een oud, onaangepast schema is: 1) een breed algemeen verbreid schema 2) bestaat uit herinneringen, emoties, cognities en lichamelijke gewaarwordingen 3) heeft betrekking tot het zelf en relaties met anderen 4) ontstaan tijdens kindertijd of adolescentie 5) in de loop van de tijd verder uitgebreid 6) disfunctioneel.

Disfunctioneel gedrag is een reactie op het schema.

Kenmerken van oude onaangepaste schema’s

In volwassenheid worden schema’s geactiveerd door gebeurtenissen die als gelijk worden gezien als die in de jeugd.

Oude onaangepaste schema’s zijn het effect van schadelijke ervaringen. Deze schema’s bestaan voort door het verlangen naar consistentie.

Mensen voelen zich aangetrokken tot gebeurtenissen die hun schema’s activeren. De schema’s worden als ‘waar’ beschouwd en hebben invloed op de wijze waarop latere ervaringen worden verwerkt.

Schema’s beginnen als een op werkelijkheid gebaseerde voorstelling van de omgeving van het kind. Het disfunctionele karakter van het schema blijkt als cliënten in hun contact met andere mensen aan hun schema’s vast blijven houden (hoewel de perceptie niet juist is).

Schema’s zijn dimensioneel, zij verschillen in heftigheid en omvang. Hoe heftiger het schema, hoe groter het aantal situaties dat het activeert. Des te strenger het schema, des te heviger het negatieve affect wanneer het wordt opgeroepen en des te langer het aanhoudt.

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Restructured Clinical (RC) and Personality Pathology Five (PSY-5) scales - summary of chapter 7 of MMPI-2 assessing perosnality and psychopathology

Restructured Clinical (RC) and Personality Pathology Five (PSY-5) scales - summary of chapter 7 of MMPI-2 assessing perosnality and psychopathology

Image

Graham, J. R., MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology, 5th edition. H7: Restructured Clinical (RC) and Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) Scales. Pagina 156-181


Development of the RC scales

The first step in constructing the RC scales was to develop a general scale labelled Demoralisation. Removal of this general factor from the clinical scales would result in a set of restructured scales that would be less intercorrelated and have greater discriminant validity.

Demoralisation is equivalent to the pleasant-unpleasant dimension of self-reported affect.

The next step was designed to identify the core component of each original scale with the general demoralisation factor removed. Factors were extracted and rotated in a manner that yielded a clear demoralization factor, which included all of the provisional Demoralisation scale items as well as items in the clinical scales that are primarily demoralisation markers, and a second factor that could be considered the substantive core for a clinical scale.

The third step involved identifying items with high loadings on the factor representing the core of each to serve as a ‘seed’ scale for each RC scale. A given seed scale was assigned those items that had the highest loadings on the scale’s core factor and that did not have salient loadings on the demoralisation factor. Overlapping items were removed, as were items that detracted from the internal consistency of a seed scale.

The 12 seed scales (demoralisation plus one for each original clinical scale except scale 5) were correlated with all other MMPI-2 items in four clinical samples. Items were selected for the RC scales if they had high correlations with a particular seed scale and low correlation with other seed scales. Items were deleted from a scale if they did not contribute to the scale’s internal consistency or appropriately correlated with conceptually relevant external criterion measures.

This resulted in restructured versions of Clinical scales 1-4 and 6-9 and a demoralisation scale.

Inter-correlations of RC scales and clinical scales

Inter-correlations of the RC scale are lower than for the clinical scale. This makes greater discriminant validity. The scales assess similar, but not identical constructs.

The RC scales are substantially less saturated with demoralisation than are the clinical scales.

Reliability of the RC

.....read more
Access: 
Public
The MMPI-2 restructured clincial scales (RC) and restraints to innovation - summary of an article by Stephen and Kamphuis

The MMPI-2 restructured clincial scales (RC) and restraints to innovation - summary of an article by Stephen and Kamphuis

Image

Stephen E. Finn & Jan H. Kamphuis (2006) The MMPI–2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales and Restraints to Innovation, or "What Have They Done to My Song?", Journal of Personality Assessment, 87:2, 202-210


Introduction

The RC scales are a set of nine non-overlapping scales designed to measure the common factor (Demoralisation) and unique components of the eight original Clinical Scales.

The RC scales are robust.

Conceptual and methodological flaws?

Comparing like with like: multivariate scales and ‘syndromal fidelity’

A loss of ‘multivariate structure’ is a critique of the RC scales.

There are several reasons why unifactorial scales may be preferred over syndromal scales: 1) syndromes are generally not true traxa and go through changes in definitions over time. Unifactorial scales have better chance of being useful over time 2) Syndromes consist of subdomains, which are better assessed by multiple-separate measures than by one composite amalgam.

Confusing the Nature of the clinical scales, content scales, RC scales and the DSM-IV

The DSM-IV criteria define a disorder, whereas the MMPI-2 clinical scale items are heterogeneous fallible indicators of syndromes.

The main thing the RC and content scales have in common is their high internal consistency and subsequent face validity.

Item composition and the ‘credibility’ of the RC scales

The RC scales were not a priori meant to be the same as the clinical scales. The idea was to use factor analyses to reshuffle the MMPI-2 items such that eight non-overlapping scales would emerge that captured unique components of the original Clinical scales.

Unfortunate omissions?

Other purely empirical ways to solve the Clinical scale covariation problem

There are other, possibly superior ways to attack Clinical scale covariation. It is an empirical question whether these are better.

On the nature of DEM and Construct Drift

Dem is the theoretically inspired and depressively biased marker that simultaneously overextracts and underetracts unwanted variance from the Clinical Scales, in turn resulting in construct drift in the next step of the RC Scales’ derivation. Construct drift is relative to some other target construct. The RC scales describe related but different constructs than the original clinical scales.

Redundant? Restructured? Clinical?

The RC scales show meaningful relations to the Clinical scales but are not identical nor ‘proxies’ for the Clinical scales nor were they meant to be. They aim

.....read more
Access: 
JoHo members
The MMPI - summary of part of chapter 7 of Handbook of psychological assessment

The MMPI - summary of part of chapter 7 of Handbook of psychological assessment

Image

Groth-Marnat, G. Handbook of Psychological Assessment, Wiley, Pagina 213-226, 240-269, 295-297, 302-304

Chapter 7. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory


Introduction

The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is a standardised questionnaire that elicits a wide range of self-descriptions scored to give a quantitative measurement of an individual’s level of emotional adjustment and attitude toward test taking.

The MMPI test format consisted of affirmative statements that could be answered ‘True’ or ‘False’.

The original MMPI had 13 scales. The recent MMPI-2 and MMPI-A have maintained the original 10 clinical/personality scales as well as the original 3 validity scales. The total number of validity scales has been increased.

The clinical and personality scales are known by their scale numbers and scale abbreviations. Additional options are available to refine the meaning of the clinical scales as well as provide additional information 1) content scales, scales based on item content 2) Harris-Lingoes subscales, for the clinical and personality scales based on clusters of content-related items 3) critical scales, assessment of items and item clusters that relate to relevant dimensions 4) supplementary scales, empirically derived new scales.

The content for the majority of MMPI questions are relatively obvious and deal largely with psychiatric, psychological, neurological, or physical symptoms. Some questions are psychologically obscure because the underlying process they are assessing is not intuitively obvious.

After a test profile has been developed, the scores are frequently arranged or coded in a way that summarizes and highlights significant peaks and valleys. To accurately interpret the test, both the overall configuration of the different scales and the relevant demographic characteristics of the client must be taken into consideration. In many instances, the same scaled score on one test profile can mean something quite differently on another person’s profile when the elevations of lowerings of other scales are considered.  

The scales represent measures of personality traits rather than simply diagnostic categories. It is useful to consider that the scales indicate clusters of personality variables.

History and development

The MMPI was developed to be an aid in assessing adult patients during routine psychiatric case workshops and could accurately determine the severity of their disturbances. The developers were interested in developing an objective estimate of the change produced by psychotherapy or other variables in the patient’s life.

Empirical criterion keying refers to the development, selection, and scoring of items within the scales based on some external criterion of reference. If a clinical population was given a serious of questions to answer, the individuals developing

.....read more
Access: 
JoHo members
The case formulation model - summary of chapter 1 and 3 of Cognitive therapy in practice: a case formulation approach

The case formulation model - summary of chapter 1 and 3 of Cognitive therapy in practice: a case formulation approach

Image

Persons. J. B. Cognitive therapy in practice: A case formulation approach. H1 & H3.


Chapter 1: The case formulation model

Psychological problems occur at two levels

The case formulation model conceptualizes psychological problems as occurring at two levels: 1) overt difficulties, ‘real life’ problems, like depressed moods or panic attacks 2) underlying psychological mechanisms,the psychological deficits that underlie and cause the overt difficulties. They can often be expressed in terms of one (or a few) irrational beliefs about the self.

Overt difficulties

At a ‘macro’ level, overt difficulties include such things as depression, relationship difficulties, obesity and fears. These are problems as they might be described in the clients own terms.

At a ‘micro’ level, problems can be described in terms of three components: 1) cognitions 2) behaviours 3) moods. All three components of problems usually reflect the irrational, maladaptive nature of the underlying mechanism.

Cognitions

A cognitive component can be found for nearly every problem clients report. Negative mood states usually involve negative automatic thoughts. Automatic thoughts are related to problematic behaviours.

Cognitions can involve thoughts, images, (day)dreams and memories.

Behaviour

Three types of behaviours are considered in the case formulation model 1) overt motor behaviours, such things as spending hours in bed, overeating and arguing with others 2) physiological responses, such things as increased heart rate, dizziness, insomnia 3) verbal behaviours, like continual request for reassurance.

Behavioural components of a client’s problems are usually best described as problematic or maladaptive.

Mood

The term ‘mood’ refers to the client’s subjective report of his emotional experience.

Relationships among the components

Synchrony: Usually a problem in one component indicates that problems in other components are also present. An underlying deficit is usually manifested in all three components at the overt level, not just one or two. If this isn’t the case, the problem is desynchronous.

Interdependence: The synchronous relationship suggest that a change in any one component is likely to produce changes in the other components. These interdependent relationships are indicated by the arrows connecting behaviour, cognitions and mood.

Underlying mechanisms

The underlying psychological mechanism is a problem or deficit that produces, or is responsible for, the individual’s overt difficulties. The therapist’s ideas about the underlying cognitions operating in any given case are best viewed as working hypotheses.

Underlying beliefs are often well-expressed in an ‘if-then’ format. Sometimes they are simpler, blanked statements.

Sometimes the client’s central problem

.....read more
Access: 
JoHo members
Master klinische psychologie uva
Work for WorldSupporter

Image

JoHo can really use your help!  Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world

Working for JoHo as a student in Leyden

Parttime werken voor JoHo

Check more of this topic?
How to use more summaries?


Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams

Using and finding summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter

There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.

  1. Starting Pages: for some fields of study and some university curricula editors have created (start) magazines where customised selections of summaries are put together to smoothen navigation. When you have found a magazine of your likings, add that page to your favorites so you can easily go to that starting point directly from your profile during future visits. Below you will find some start magazines per field of study
  2. Use the menu above every page to go to one of the main starting pages
  3. Tags & Taxonomy: gives you insight in the amount of summaries that are tagged by authors on specific subjects. This type of navigation can help find summaries that you could have missed when just using the search tools. Tags are organised per field of study and per study institution. Note: not all content is tagged thoroughly, so when this approach doesn't give the results you were looking for, please check the search tool as back up
  4. Follow authors or (study) organizations: by following individual users, authors and your study organizations you are likely to discover more relevant study materials.
  5. Search tool : 'quick & dirty'- not very elegant but the fastest way to find a specific summary of a book or study assistance with a specific course or subject. The search tool is also available at the bottom of most pages

Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?

Quicklinks to fields of study (main tags and taxonomy terms)

Field of study

Access level of this page
  • Public
  • WorldSupporters only
  • JoHo members
  • Private
Statistics
1704
Comments, Compliments & Kudos:

Add new contribution

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Promotions
Image
The JoHo Insurances Foundation is specialized in insurances for travel, work, study, volunteer, internships an long stay abroad
Check the options on joho.org (international insurances) or go direct to JoHo's https://www.expatinsurances.org

 

More contributions of WorldSupporter author: SanneA:
Follow the author: SanneA