Dehaene (2011). The language of numbers”. – Article summary

Contrary to most animals, humans communicate cooperatively. Infants (i.e. 10 to 12 months) begin in cooperative communication through the pointing gesture. This form of communication relies on their social-cognitive ability to direct the attention of others and to understand the attention-directing intentions of others.

Skills of intention-reading refer to social-cognitive abilities which are necessary to understand one’s intentions and which are foundational to all forms of human communication. Cognitive skills of pattern-finding refer to general cognitive processes of categorization, analogy, schema formation and distributional learning aimed at reconstructing the linguistic abstractions of a speech community to become productive and creative with the conventions of a language.

One theory of language acquisition is that children have innate knowledge of language (e.g. Chomsky) and these innate grammar structures constrain language development. Constructivist theories state that children acquire competence with a language mainly through cultural learning and other cognitive processes (e.g. categorization; analogy). In constructivist theories, children are biologically prepared for language but only in general ways (e.g. capacities for cultural learning).  

An utterance refers to the smallest unit in which a person expresses a complete communicative intention (e.g. ‘give’). It is used to direct a recipient’s attention to something and to express a communicative motive (e.g. through an emotional expression). A child needs to understand the communicative intention of an utterance before the child can use it. Adults help this by stressing the word in a sentence. When a child does not understand the sub-functions of an utterance, the child will not be able to use it in different situations (e.g. novel situations).

Children learn words by attempting to understand utterances. To understand utterances, children often need to determine the functional role of a word. To learn a new word, children must extract it from a larger utterance and connect it to the relevant aspect of the current situation. Children learn the function of an utterance or word and this is how they begin to learn language.

A linguistic construction refers to a unit of language that comprises multiple linguistic elements used together for a relatively coherent communicative function. The elements also perform sub-functions. Constructions vary in their complexity depending on the number of elements and interrelations and they also vary in their abstractness. This makes that people know the general profile of an event in a sentence without knowing anything about individual content words (i.e. grammatical structure tells us who does what).

Holophrases refer to one-unit utterances with an intonational contour expressing communicative motive. Children begin speaking language by using holophrases. The initial schemas and constructions of children are very concrete and are organized around particular words and phrases instead of around abstract categories. The utterance-level constructions underlying children’s earliest multi-word utterances have three types:

  1. Word combinations (18 months)
    This refers to a combination of two words or holophrases in situations in which they both are relevant, with both words having equivalent status (e.g. ball table). It partitions the experience of a child in multiple symbolic units.
  2. Pivot schemas (18 months)
    This refers to utterances that are structured by a single word or phrase. This means that one utterance/word is used with a wide variety of object labels (e.g. more milk; more grapes; more juice). These schemes are organized around particular words with only one slot that is abstract and do not have syntax.
  3. Item-based constructions (i.e. verb-island constructions)
    This refers to a construction which has a syntactic marking as an integral part of the construction although the syntactic marking is verb-specific (i.e. it depends on how a child has heard a particular verb being used). This means that children’s early grammatical productions are item-specific.

Children tend to use words and utterances in already established pivot schemes (e.g. repeat the verb in a way that is known rather than use it in a new way). Children tend to move away from verb-island constructions around their third birthday. The process of constructing more abstract constructions begins between two and three ears of age. However, they all have a particular communicative function:

  1. Identificationals, attributives, and possesives.
    This serves to identify an object or to attribute to it some property (e.g. that’s a; that’s; this is my).
  2. Simple transitives and intransitives
    This serves to indicate or request an activity or state of affairs (e.g. Daddy cut the grass).
  3. Datives, ditransitives, and benefactives
    This serves to indicate or request the transfer of objects between people (e.g. ‘he gave it to mommy”).
  4. Locatives, resultatives and causatives
    This serves to indicate or request spatial or causal relationships (e.g. Put it on the table).
  5. Passives and reflexives
    This serves to indicate things happening to people or things who are not active agents (e.g. He got hit by a car).
  6. Imperatives and questions
    This serves to request actions without a subject (e.g. Don’t do that).

Children typically develop from using relatively fixed syntactic constructions in different situations to using more abstract constructions. Young children do not seem to have an overall rule for forming questions but have a collection of more item-based schemas that will become a set of more coherent and abstract constructions later in development.

According to usage-based theories of language acquisition, children acquire language using their general cognitive and social-cognitive abilities. This requires intention-reading skills for determining the meaning and communicative function of concrete pieces of language and pattern-finding skills to detect and construct abstract grammatical patterns of these meaningful uses of language.

Schematization refers to learning the recurrent concrete pieces of language for concrete functions and forming a relatively abstract slot designating a relatively abstract function. This schematization leads to item-based constructions. The formation of slots relative to constant items are affected by token and type frequency.

Token frequency refers to the frequency with which a specific form is heard in a sample. This predicts the selection of a constant item in a schema because a word that occurs more often can be picked more easily as a constant. Type frequency refers to the frequency with which different items of the same type (e.g. nouns referring to sought things) are heard. This predicts where slots are formed in relation to constant items.

To move from item-based constructions to abstract constructions, children need to form schemas that have no concrete items in common. The learning process that achieves this is an analogy; a form of schematization that places heavy emphasis on commonalities in relational structure. Analogies will be formed more easily if certain items always tend to fill certain roles (e.g. actor role is always filled by similar objects). The key skill in analogy formation is the ability to focus on detecting similarities in relational structure and this is central to the acquisition of grammar.

To cluster words and morphemes into categories (e.g. noun; pronoun), children must draw upon information about the world’s distribution and its function. Distribution refers to the types of neighbourhoods a words tend to inhabit. Functionally based distributional analysis refers to the identification of items in a category on the grounds that they occur in the same formal contexts and perform the same communicative function within an utterance.

Children may learn about different verb classes (e.g. manner of locomotion and motion in a specified direction) (i.e. entrenchment). It is likely that children only learn verbs for the constructions in which they have heard them. This is likely in early development but not in later development. The more often children hear a verb used in a particular construction, the less likely they will be to extend that verb to any novel construction (i.e. pre-emption). When children hear a verb used in a linguistic construction that serves the same communicative function as some possible generalization, they may infer that the generalization is not conventional (i.e. knowledge of semantic sub-classes of verbs). Entrenchment (1), pre-emption (2) and knowledge of semantic sub-classes of verbs (3) are constraining processes in learning language.

Entrenchment appears to work from 3-years-old. Pre-emption and semantic sub-classes begin to work later. Verb-argument constructions are constrained gradually as they gradually become more abstract.

 

Access: 
Public

Image

This content is also used in .....

Childhood: Developmental Psychology – Article overview (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)

Bjorklund & Causey (2017). Biological bases of development” – Article summary

Bjorklund & Causey (2017). Biological bases of development” – Article summary

Image

Evolution refers to the process of change in gene frequencies within populations over many generations. The major principle of evolution is reproductive fitness, which refers to the likelihood that an individual will produce offspring or that that individual’s offspring will produce offspring. Evolution provides an explanation for how a mechanism developed but also why it developed. Previously adaptive mechanisms may not be adaptive anymore in modern society.

Evolutionary developmental psychology refers to a field which looks at development of humans from an evolutionary perspective. It is useful to look at which cognitive operations underlie adaptive behaviour. Psychological mechanisms (e.g. cognitive psychology) may be the missing link between evolution and behaviour.

It is possible that domain-specific mechanisms designed by natural selection to deal with specific aspects of the physical or social environment (e.g. face recognition) evolved. However, evolution has also influenced domain-general mechanisms (e.g. executive functions). There are three types of constraints on learning:

  1. Architectural constraints
    This refers to the ways in which the brain is organized at birth (e.g. neurons). This limits the type of and manner in which information can be processed. This, in turn, influences what is processed as development progresses (e.g. no processing of peer feedback at infancy yet).
  2. Chronotopic constraints (i.e. maturational constraints)
    This refers to limitations on the developmental timing of events (e.g. some brain areas develop earlier than others). Brain areas may be sensitive to certain types of learning during a particular timeframe (e.g. language learning), putting constraints on learning but also enabling it.
  3. Representational constraints
    This refers to hardwired representations in the brain (i.e. innate knowledge). This guides and constraints learning (e.g. basic knowledge of objects).

These constraints indicate that people are prepared by natural selection to process some information more readily than other. Evolved probabilistic cognitive mechanisms refer to information-processing mechanisms that have evolved to solve recurrent problems faced by ancestral populations but they are expressed in a probabilistic fashion in each individual in a generation. This means that it will develop in a species-typical manner if the individual experiences a species-typical environment but if not, development will be different (e.g. people are not innately afraid of snakes but are ready to develop a fear of snakes if the environment gives reason for this).

According to Geary, the mind is a set of hierarchically organized domain-specific modules that develop as children engage their physical and social worlds. Though people have domain-specific modules, human cognition is adaptive to local conditions. Development fine tunes the modules that are very flexible and broad.

The long period of youth in children may be necessary or children to master complexities of human societies and technologies. This means that cognition needs to be adapted to a wide range of environments. There are biologically primary abilities (e.g. language):

  1. This has undergone selection pressure and has evolved to deal with problems faced by our ancestors.
  2. This
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Kuppens & Ceulemans (2019). Parenting styles: A closer look at a well-known concept”. – Article summary

Kuppens & Ceulemans (2019). Parenting styles: A closer look at a well-known concept”. – Article summary

Image

Parenting practices refer to directly observable specific behaviours that parents use to socialize their children (e.g. supervision with homework). There are two broad dimensions of parenting:

  1. Parental support
    This refers to the affective nature of the parent-child relationship. Behaviours involve showing involvement (1), acceptance (2), emotional availability (3), warmth (4) and responsivity (3). This is associated with positive child outcomes.
  2. Parental control
    1. Behavioural control
      This refers to behaviours aimed at controlling, managing or regulating the child’s behaviour through enforcing demands and rules (1), disciplinary strategies (2), punishment (3) or supervisory functions (4). This is associated with positive child outcomes if not used excessively or not at all.
    2. Psychological control
      This refers to behaviours aimed at manipulating children’s thoughts, feelings and emotions. This is associated with negative child outcomes.

It is possible that a combination of parenting practices impact child development rather than the practices or dimensions in isolation. Parenting style refers to a parent’s configuration of parenting dimensions and practices. Baumrind suggested three parenting styles:

  1. Authoritarian parenting style
    This refers to a parenting style where the parents try to shape, control and evaluate their children’s behaviour based on an absolute set of standards.
  2. Permissive parenting style
    This refers to a parenting style where the parents are warmer and more autonomy granting rather than controlling.
  3. Authoritative parenting style
    This refers to a parenting style which falls between authoritarian and permissive.

Another typology of parenting styles was developed by Maccoby and Martin:

  1. Authoritative (i.e. high responsiveness, high demanding).
  2. Authoritarian (i.e. low responsiveness, high demanding).
  3. Indulgent (i.e. high responsiveness, low demanding).
  4. Neglectful (i.e. low responsiveness, low demanding).

Authoritative parenting styles are associated with positive developmental outcomes while permissive and authoritarian styles were not. Outcomes for the children of neglectful parents were the poorest.

Children in two-parent households are influenced by the parenting style of both parents but also by the interaction of these styles (e.g. additive effect for two authoritative parents). By incorporating psychological control, several other parenting styles could be identified:

  1. Congruent authoritative parenting style
    This refers to a parenting style where both parents use an authoritative parenting style. Both parents show warmth and involvement but set clear rules and expectations. Undesirable behaviour is disciplined but rarely using physical punishment.
  2. Congruent positive authoritative parenting style
    This refers to a parenting style where both parents show warmth and involvement while setting clear rules and expectations. However, they rarely discipline the child and there is strong support and behaviour control to promote desired behaviour.
  3. Congruent authoritarian parenting style
    This refers to a parenting style where both parents show less warmth and are less involved in the relationship with their child. There is strict physical punishment without setting clear rules for the child’s behaviour.
  4. Congruent intrusive
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Taraban & Shaw (2018). Parenting in context: Revisiting Belsky’s classic process of parenting model in early childhood.” – Article summary

Taraban & Shaw (2018). Parenting in context: Revisiting Belsky’s classic process of parenting model in early childhood.” – Article summary

Image

According to Jay Belsky’s process of parenting model, parenting is determined by characteristics of the parent, child and family social context. Parental personality and parental psychological functioning are important factors in the parental domain. In the child’s domain, a difficult temperament is important. In the social context domain, parents’ work habits, sources of parental social support and marital relationship quality are important. 

Positive parenting refers to dimensions of parenting such as warmth, sensitivity, limit setting, appropriate scaffolding and contingency-based reinforcement. Negative parenting refers to behaviours that are inconsistent, over-reactive, controlling and harsh. Negative parenting has been linked to negative child outcomes (e.g. lower academic achievement) while positive parenting has been linked to adaptive child outcomes. Associations between parenting and child outcomes are stronger in early childhood. Adolescence may also be a critical period.

Fathers have taken up a larger parenting role over the recent years. Research shows that the parenting of fathers is subject to contextual influence and has a great impact on child outcomes.

According to Belsky, there are three primary predictors of parenting:

  1. Developmental history
    This may predispose the parent to have certain traits which impact the ability to parent. There is evidence for the intergenerational transmission of parenting for mothers, highlighting the importance of developmental history. Parenting and family climate one experiences as a child is a strong predictor of future parenting for mothers.
  2. Personality
    1. Extraversion
      This is associated with high levels of energy, sociability, response to reward and optimism. This may lead to more sensitive and responsive parenting but the limited verbal ability of a child may lead to maladaptive outcomes due to the social desires of the parents. This may negatively impact fathers but not mothers.
    2. Agreeableness
      This is associated with cooperativeness, being trustful, prosocial and willing to compromise. This is associated with positive parenting because these people have a high investment in maintaining close social relationships. It may also be a protective factor against mother’s likelihood to engage in harsh parenting.
    3. Conscientiousness
      This is associated with being organized, dependable, responsible and orderly. This can aid parenting though extremely high levels of conscientiousness may be detrimental to parenting as there may be conflict between the chaos of a young child and the desire to be very organized. There is a positive association with warm parenting.
    4. Neuroticism
      This is associated with being anxious, insecure and emotionally unstable. It is negatively associated with adaptive parenting behaviours. The focus on their own distress impairs their ability to respond sensitively to the need of the child. It is negatively associated with warm parenting. This may impact mothers more than fathers.
    5. Openness
      This is associated with originality, imagination, open-mindedness and broad-ranging interests. This may lead to sensitive parenting though the desire for new activities may conflict with the need for repetitive tasks of parenting.
  3. Psychopathology
    Depression is associated with impaired parenting
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Tucker-Drob, Briley, & Harden (2013). Genetic and environmental influences on cognition across development and context" – Article summary

Tucker-Drob, Briley, & Harden (2013). Genetic and environmental influences on cognition across development and context" – Article summary

Image

Cognition is about 50% - 70% heritable at the population level. Heritability is maximized when people choose their own environments and experiences.

Gene-environment correlation states that people with more similar genes experience more similar environments and vice versa. Transactional models state that early-life behaviours, driven by genetics, lead to a person selecting particular types of environments. These environments have a causal effect on cognition, leading to the notion that the original behaviours led to these experiences and this cognition (e.g. having higher IQ leads to environments where you can stimulate IQ, which leads to an even higher IQ). Traits such as intelligence, motivation and intellectual interest are important in selecting these environments. Genes are thus very important in selecting environments which, in turn, have large impact on cognition. This leads to a large estimate of heritability.

The availability of environmental experiences is essential in choosing one’s own environment. Differences in heritability between groups could thus demonstrate important underlying developmental processes. Heritability differs along age/development and socioeconomic advantage.

Heritability increases with age as people tend to select their own environments more and more. Children select experiences in line with their genetic predispositions and these experiences stimulate cognitive development. This means that the early genetic influences on cognition will become amplified. Another explanation for the increased heritability with age is that new genes become activated later in development (e.g. biological changes of puberty).

There may be lower heritability in children with lower SES. This may be because people with lower SES have less freedom to choose the most enriching experiences which, in turn, lead to more heritability. SES disadvantage may not disrupt gene-environmental transactions in countries that ensure high quality healthcare and education (e.g. Scandinavian countries).

Access: 
Public
Gross (2010). Emotion regulation.” – Article summary

Gross (2010). Emotion regulation.” – Article summary

Image

Emotions may facilitate adaptation by readying behavioural responses (1), enhancing memory for important events (2) and guide interpersonal interactions (3). However, emotions are maladaptive when they are of the wrong type (1), at the wrong time (2) or at the wrong intensity level (3). Emotions consist of three key features:

  1. Emotions arise when an individuals attend to a situation and understands it as being relevant to one’s current goals (i.e. the meaning a person assigns to a situation).
  2. Emotions are multifaceted and involve changes in subjective experience (1), behaviour (2) and peripheral physiology (3) (e.g. it gives rise to subjective feeling).
  3. Emotions are malleable (i.e. it gives rise to response tendencies that can be changed).

The behavioural changes as a result of emotions are associated with autonomic and neuroendocrine changes that anticipate the associated behavioural response with an emotion.

The modal model of emotion states that emotion arises four steps:

  1. There is an inter-personal situation.
  2. The situation demands some form of attention.
  3. The situation is appraised.
  4. There is a response (e.g. anger).

Emotions can change the environment which, in turn, alters the probability of experiencing a certain emotion.

Emotion regulation refers to how one attempts to influence the emotions one has, when one experiences them, how one experiences them and how one expresses these emotions. Intrinsic emotion regulation refers to regulating one’s own emotions. Extrinsic emotion regulation refers to regulating the emotions of somebody else (e.g. regulating the emotions of a child). Emotions can be down-regulated (i.e. lower intensity of emotions) but also up-regulated (i.e. greater intensity of emotions).

Emotion regulatory acts may have their primary impact at different points in the emotion generative process. Each of the parts of the modal model of emotion may be influenced by emotion regulation. There are five points at which individuals can regulate emotions:

  1. Situation selection
    This refers to the subset of choices that are taken with a view to the future consequences of the actions for the emotional responses (i.e. actively taking steps to influence emotions). This affects the situation to which a person is exposed. It involves taking actions to make it more likely to be in a situation which gives rise to desired emotions or vice versa (e.g. actively seek out situations that provide us with contact with friends). This process is difficult as people often show duration neglect where they are not good at estimating how long one would feel a certain way as a result of a situation. It is difficult to balance the short- and long-term effects of situation selection and thus often requires the perspective of others.
  2. Situation modification (i.e. problem-focused coping)
    This refers to efforts to modify the situation (i.e. external physical environments) directly to alter the emotional impact. This can take many forms, including emotion expression as a form of extrinsic emotion regulation form.
  3. Attentional deployment
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Zelazo & Müller (2011). Executive function in typical and atypical development.” – Article summary

Zelazo & Müller (2011). Executive function in typical and atypical development.” – Article summary

Image

Executive function (EF) refers to the psychological processes involved in the conscious control of thought and action. However, there are several possible definitions:

  • Executive function corresponds to planning (1), decision making (2), judgement (3) and self-perception (4).
  • Executive function corresponds to inhibitory control.
  • Executive function refers to a cognitive module consisting of effector output elements involving inhibition, working memory and organisational strategies necessary to prepare a response (i.e. homunculus approach).

It may be that executive function consists of separable but related constructs. It seems to consist of inhibition of prepotent responses (1), shifting between mental sets (i.e. flexibility) (2) and updating and monitoring of representations in working memory (3). However, by conducting a task which is aimed at a single construct of EF, it is unclear whether it taps into multiple component processes (e.g. does flexibility rely on inhibitory control or are they separate constructs).

Executive function has several developmental characteristics:

  • It emerges first in early development, around a year of age.
  • It develop across a wide range of ages (e.g. important changes between 2 and 5 years; adult-like function around 12 years; some changes continuing into adulthood).
  • Failures in executive function occur in different situations at different ages and this depends on the complexity of the situation.
  • There are ‘hot’ aspects (e.g. ventral and medial parts of prefrontal cortex) and ‘cool’ aspects of executive function (e.g. lateral prefrontal cortex).
  • Difficulties with executive function may be a consequence of perturbations of the epigenetic process.
  • Different developmental disorders involve impairments in different aspects of EF.

Luria states that the prefrontal cortex consists of interactive functional systems which involve the integration of subsystems. The subsystems have specific roles but cannot be considered outside of the larger systems. This means that executive function may be a function and not a mechanism or cognitive structure. Functions refer to behavioural constructs defined in terms of their outcome (e.g. what they accomplish). It is possible to organize functionally distinct phases around the constant outcome of solving a problem (i.e. the outcome of EF).

Intending refers to keeping a plan in mind to control behaviour. Rule use refers to translating a plan into action. After acting, evaluation occurs and this includes error detection and error correction. Representational inflexibility refers to the inability to form a new plan. Lack of response control refers to the inability to carry out a new plan.

Executive function draws on the prefrontal cortex but it is not the same. Damage to the PFC does not necessarily mean executive function impairment. The prefrontal cortex includes the orbitofrontal cortex (1), dorsomedial cortex (2), ventrolateral cortex (3), dorsolateral cortex (4) and rostrolateral prefrontal cortices (5).

The lateral prefrontal cortex may play an important role in the integration of sensory and mnemonic information and the regulation of intellectual function and action. It is connected to the thalamus (1), parts

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Hay, Payne, & Chadwick (2004). Peer relations in childhood.” – Article summary

Hay, Payne, & Chadwick (2004). Peer relations in childhood.” – Article summary

Image

There is a bi-directional influence between peer relationships and children’s disorders. Children’s problems with peers may contribute to the genesis of the disorder (e.g. anxiety) and the disorders may make peer contact more problematic.

Matching of negative emotion with another infant (e.g. making another infant cry in the nursery) is the first form of peer interaction. Variation in responsiveness to young peers may relate to general individual differences in emotionality and behavioural inhibition.

Infants start to smile at, reach towards and touch other infants by the second half of the first year of life. This behaviours develops simultaneously with peers and adults. Topic-related interactions between infant peers is a characteristic of the second year of life (e.g. direct peers’ attention to toys).

Contingent peer interactions (i.e. contingent responsiveness) refers to an interaction which resembles turn-taking and can be observed at 6 months. Infants are better at this when a toy is not present. One year olds are able to engage in cooperative games with their peers. This makes use of sustained interactions with mutual engagement (1), repetition of actions (2), alternating of turns (3) and playful quality (4). Other forms of prosocial behaviour (e.g. helping; sharing; comforting) emerge around the first birthday.

One year olds also have conflict with peers and use force to pursue their goals, next to being cooperative and prosocial. Most conflict regards the possession of toys or violation of personal space. Conflicts between young peers are characterized by communicative gestures and signs of social influence. Toddlers use hitting and grabbing. Grabbing tends to decrease over time while hitting remains stable. This may be a precursor for later aggression. Younger toddlers show more frequent, brief aggression and older toddlers show fewer but more sustained aggressive behaviours. This peaks around 30 months of age. Adult behaviour affects toddlers’ responses to conflict.

Infants are more likely to respond positively to unfamiliar peers than to unfamiliar adults. They also interact differently with unfamiliar peers compared to familiar peers. Preferences for playmates develop in toddlerhood as well as preferences for same sex peers.

There are individual differences in the quality of play with peers during the first few years of life. It is predicted by the social environment (1), experience with siblings (2), attachment figures (3) and other caregivers (4).

Stable individual differences in competence with peers emerge in the first years of life. Individual differences in aggression and externalizing problems emerge during toddlerhood. Socially inhibited behaviour in preschool settings is predicted by earlier patterns of inhibition with peers.

An infant’s ability to engage successfully in interaction with peers requires several skills:

  1. Joint attention
    This refers to the ability to coordinate attention with another person and develops with adult partners between 6-12 months of age. Joint attention in the second year predicts theory of mind skills. Successful peer interaction requires being able to read and produce joint attention signals
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Matthews et al. (2020). A longitudinal twin study of victimization and loneliness from childhood to young adulthood.” – Article summary

Matthews et al. (2020). A longitudinal twin study of victimization and loneliness from childhood to young adulthood.” – Article summary

Image

Children and adolescents who are exposed to victimization face increased risk of diverse negative outcomes by early adulthood (e.g. psychopathology; lower educational and career attainment; inflammatory disease). It could lead to loneliness, which refers to psychological distress associated with perceived shortcomings in one’s social relationships. Individuals vary in their susceptibility to feeling lonely. The heritability of loneliness is 40%-50%.

The evolutionary model of loneliness states that humans are motivated to seek social connection as it confers a sense of safety. Being victimized is a sign that one’s safety is compromised and this could elicit a feeling that one’s social network is deficient and not fulfilling the desired functions.

Bullying has several characteristics:

  • It takes place between peers of similar age.
  • It is characterized by an imbalance of power in favour of the perpetrator.
  • It takes place online or offline (i.e. cyberbullying).

With cyberbullying, there is no physical location (1), the identity of the perpetrator may not be known (2) and it may continue even if the victim removes oneself from the situation (3). It is associated with greater loneliness and other emotional problems.

Bullying may play an important role in the development of loneliness. Emotional maltreatment may disrupt the formation of secure attachments and this negatively shapes individuals’ perceptions of their relationships with others. This could have a negative effect on loneliness. Polyvictimization refers to the experience of multiple victimization of different types. This is a stronger predictor of negative outcomes.

People that are victimized may be more lonely but it is also possible that more lonely people get victimized more often. This may be due to traits and negative stereotypes associated with loneliness (e.g. shyness).

People who have been exposed to one form of severe victimization are lonelier than those who are not. People who have been exposed to multiple forms of victimization are even more lonely. People who have been victimized in both childhood and adolescence were lonelier than people who were victimized in one of these time periods.

Bullying is associated with loneliness regardless of pre-existing psychopathology or genetics (i.e. it also is the case for twins). Adolescent victimization is associated with greater feelings of loneliness and especially for severe maltreatment (1), sexual victimization (2) and neglect (3) regardless of childhood loneliness or victimization.

Severe physical or sexual abuse and bullying up to age 12 predicts feelings of loneliness at age 18. This is mainly the case for frequent bullying, regardless of loneliness in childhood. Lonely children are at increased risk of experiencing new instances of victimization during adolescence.

The loneliness that victimized adults in childhood and adolescence felt is partly explained by the presence of mental health problems and by genetic influences. This holds for all forms of victimization except for bullying.

In late childhood and early adolescence, feelings of loneliness are strongly related to an unfulfilled need to be accepted by

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Schaffer (2006). Social and personality development.” – Article summary

Schaffer (2006). Social and personality development.” – Article summary

Image

A peer refers to two or more people who are operating at similar levels of behavioural complexity (e.g. two toddlers). This means that children who differ in age can be considered peer as long as they adjust their behaviour to suit one another’s capabilities as they pursue common interests or goals.

Conflict among peers when resources (e.g. toys) are scarce can help children learn how to resolve their differences in a positive way. This fosters the growth of prosocial conflict resolution (e.g. sharing). Hostile exchanges could create dominance hierarchies which minimizes the likelihood of future aggression within the peer group. Peer interaction may promote the development of adaptive patterns of social conduct.

Equal-status contacts (i.e. same age interactions) with peers are likely to contribute to the development of social competencies. This is more difficult to obtain with parents as parents are the more powerful interaction partner and this is not the case with same-age peers.

A mixed-age peer interaction refers to interactions among children who differ in age by a year or more. The asymmetry in this interaction (i.e. one child having more social competencies) could help children acquire certain social competencies. The presence of younger peers may foster the development of compassion (1), caregiving (2), prosocial inclinations (3), assertiveness (4) and leadership skills (5). Younger peers learn a variety of new skills from this interaction. Mixed-age peer interaction does not have the same influence as sibling contact as sibling status is determined by order of birth whereas peer status is more flexible.

Children tend to spend more time in mixed-age interactions than with same-age peers. As a result of gender segregation in childhood, boys form packs where competition is central (e.g. team sports; competitive games) whereas girls form pairs where a cooperative relationship is central.

Parents and peers each contribute something essential but different to a child’s social development. Regular contact with sensitive, responsive parents permits infants to acquire basic interactive skills and provides them with a sense of security. Contact with peers may allow children to elaborate their basic interactive routines and develop competent and adaptive patterns of social behaviour with those who are similar to them (i.e. peers). Peer rejection is a risk factor for negative outcomes (e.g. delinquency).

Harris claims that peers are more important as socialization agents than parents because parental influence is mainly genetic while peer influence is mainly environmental (e.g. parents react to individual differences in the child due to genetic differences rather than create these differences using parenting). However, parenting behaviour does matter.

Sociability refers to one’s willingness to interact with others and seek their attention or approval. 6-7 month old babies smile, vocalize and gesture to other infants. 10-month-old infants show simple social preferences. By 1 year, they start to imitate peers and between 12 and 18 months they start to react more appropriately to each other’s behaviour (e.g. turn taking). By 18 months of age, infants begin

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Pomerantz, Ki, & Cheung (2012). Parents’ involvement in children’s learning.” – Article summary

Pomerantz, Ki, & Cheung (2012). Parents’ involvement in children’s learning.” – Article summary

Image

Parent involvement in learning may be essential as parents provide the resources children depend on (1), children spend a substantial time outside of the school environment (2) and parents are a central relationship for children (3).

Parental involvement refers to parents’ commitment of resources to children’s learning. There is a distinction between parental involvement at school and at home. School-based involvement includes practices that require parents making contact with the school (e.g. attending school meetings). Home-based involvement refers to parents’ practices related to learning that take place outside of school (e.g. assisting children with homework; talking about academic issues). Home- and school-based involvement may be connected.

Parents’ expectations and values are not necessarily a sign of their commitment of resources to children’s learning. There is an association between expectations and values and children’s achievement and a link between parents’ involvement and children’s achievement. The magnitude of the association may depend on different forms of parental involvement. The association is not diminished when SES is taken into account. Parental practices can have negative effects (e.g. monitoring) or positive effects (e.g. direct assistance with homework). Parental involvement with homework may yield negative effects because this typically only occurs when a child experiences difficulty with achievement. However, parents tend to assist children who are having difficulty with homework and this improves how these children do in school.

The more involved parents are, the more children benefit over time in terms of their achievement. Highly involved parents in their children’s learning also tend to engage in other parenting practices which are beneficial for children’s achievement (e.g. autonomy support). It is possible that the influence of parents’ involvement accumulates over time so that small effects become large. Parental involvement may be more beneficial for children’s learning among families with children at risk for achievement problems (e.g. as a result of low SES).

Parental involvement may provide children with assets that allow them to achieve their full potential. There are several models through which parental involvement may lead to improved achievement:

  1. Skill development models
    This holds that parental involvement fosters skill assets that enhance children’s achievement (i.e. cognitive or meta-cognitive skills). Parental involvement may enhance these skills because parents may gain knowledge about the children’s learning process which allows them to facilitate development (1), involvement may lead to accurate information about children’s abilities which can be used to foster skill development (2), it provides the child with opportunities to hone one’s skill through practice (3) and children receive extra attention from teachers when the teacher believes that the parents are involved (4).
  2. Motivation development models
    This holds that parental involvement provides children with motivation assets (e.g. perceived competence; intrinsic motivation) that foster children’s engagement and their achievement in school. Parental involvement may do this in several ways:

    1. It may highlight the importance of school to children and children may internalize this view, leading to intrinsic motivation.
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Roehrig et al. (2012). Effective teachers and teaching: Characteristics and practices related to positive student outcomes.” – Article summary

Roehrig et al. (2012). Effective teachers and teaching: Characteristics and practices related to positive student outcomes.” – Article summary

Image

Effective teachers are teachers who have a positive impact on students’ engagement in learning activities and the outcomes associated with students’ learning (e.g. self-regulation). Teachers operate in the atmosphere of the classroom (1), instruction (2) and management (3). Effective teaching encompasses all three domains. This means that an effective teacher is one who considers how the three domains interact and is able to respond to the teaching environment by implementing practices aligned with the four dimensions of effective teaching.

There are four dimensions of effective teaching:

  1. Developing caring classroom communities
    This includes elements from classroom management (e.g. monitoring) to promote a fair, democratic and caring classroom atmosphere.
  2. Enhancing students’ motivation to learn
    This is done by providing informative feedback that focuses on students’ effort while still expressing high expectations in ways that promotes interest and engagement.
  3. Planning and delivering engaging, assessment-driven instruction
    This includes processes of classroom management and the use of instructional strategies. The learning activities need to be planned and managed to provide an appropriate context in which to motivate students’ learning. Methods include individualizing instruction for students (1), using student assessment data for student grouping (2) and using this data for instructional focus (3).
  4. Supporting students’ deep processing and self-regulation
    This includes all other domains and requires careful coordination of all domains.

Teachers’ knowledge and dispositions are reflected in their behaviour and are thus also important. However, this indirectly influences students’ outcomes but directly affect teachers’ skills.

Developing caring classroom communities requires eliciting desirable social and behavioural student outcomes (e.g. cooperation) by using affective mechanisms (e.g. praise) and behavioural mechanisms (e.g. procedures) to establish a safe place for students ’learning. Teachers establish classroom community and atmosphere early in the semester and tend to maintain this atmosphere. Positive classroom atmospheres provides students with emotional and academic support. To establish this, teachers need to be caring and fair (1), get to know students (2) and create an atmosphere of mutual respect and positive interpersonal relationships (3).

Teachers need to be emotional warm and teachers’ positive interactions with students provide support for building their social competencies. Students need to feel a sense of belonging in school settings to promote their academic achievement and social well-being. Allowing for student collaboration fosters students’ interest, engagement and autonomy. Monitoring without public punishment leads to more engaged students. Instructional talk allows for students to respond and this may foster autonomy.

Developing a classroom community can be done by monitoring behaviour rather than punishing (1), foster a classroom community (2) and establish a democratic classroom (3).

An effective teacher elicits desirable affective and cognitive responses from students about their academic work (e.g. being excited and engaged in learning) by using affective mechanisms (e.g. their own excitement) and cognitive mechanisms (e.g. having students make predictive inferences about a story) to enhance students’ motivation to learn.

Teachers with mastery-focused values and goals tend to

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Tomasello (2010). Language development.” – Article summary

Tomasello (2010). Language development.” – Article summary

Image

Contrary to most animals, humans communicate cooperatively. Infants (i.e. 10 to 12 months) begin in cooperative communication through the pointing gesture. This form of communication relies on their social-cognitive ability to direct the attention of others and to understand the attention-directing intentions of others.

Skills of intention-reading refer to social-cognitive abilities which are necessary to understand one’s intentions and which are foundational to all forms of human communication. Cognitive skills of pattern-finding refer to general cognitive processes of categorization, analogy, schema formation and distributional learning aimed at reconstructing the linguistic abstractions of a speech community to become productive and creative with the conventions of a language.

One theory of language acquisition is that children have innate knowledge of language (e.g. Chomsky) and these innate grammar structures constrain language development. Constructivist theories state that children acquire competence with a language mainly through cultural learning and other cognitive processes (e.g. categorization; analogy). In constructivist theories, children are biologically prepared for language but only in general ways (e.g. capacities for cultural learning).  

An utterance refers to the smallest unit in which a person expresses a complete communicative intention (e.g. ‘give’). It is used to direct a recipient’s attention to something and to express a communicative motive (e.g. through an emotional expression). A child needs to understand the communicative intention of an utterance before the child can use it. Adults help this by stressing the word in a sentence. When a child does not understand the sub-functions of an utterance, the child will not be able to use it in different situations (e.g. novel situations).

Children learn words by attempting to understand utterances. To understand utterances, children often need to determine the functional role of a word. To learn a new word, children must extract it from a larger utterance and connect it to the relevant aspect of the current situation. Children learn the function of an utterance or word and this is how they begin to learn language.

A linguistic construction refers to a unit of language that comprises multiple linguistic elements used together for a relatively coherent communicative function. The elements also perform sub-functions. Constructions vary in their complexity depending on the number of elements and interrelations and they also vary in their abstractness. This makes that people know the general profile of an event in a sentence without knowing anything about individual content words (i.e. grammatical structure tells us who does what).

Holophrases refer to one-unit utterances with an intonational contour expressing communicative motive. Children begin speaking language by using holophrases. The initial schemas and constructions of children are very concrete and are organized around particular words and phrases instead of around abstract categories. The utterance-level constructions underlying children’s earliest multi-word utterances have three types:

  1. Word combinations (18 months)
    This refers to a combination of two words or holophrases in situations in which they both are relevant, with both words having equivalent status (e.g. ball table).
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Dehaene (2011). The language of numbers”. – Article summary

Dehaene (2011). The language of numbers”. – Article summary

Image

Contrary to most animals, humans communicate cooperatively. Infants (i.e. 10 to 12 months) begin in cooperative communication through the pointing gesture. This form of communication relies on their social-cognitive ability to direct the attention of others and to understand the attention-directing intentions of others.

Skills of intention-reading refer to social-cognitive abilities which are necessary to understand one’s intentions and which are foundational to all forms of human communication. Cognitive skills of pattern-finding refer to general cognitive processes of categorization, analogy, schema formation and distributional learning aimed at reconstructing the linguistic abstractions of a speech community to become productive and creative with the conventions of a language.

One theory of language acquisition is that children have innate knowledge of language (e.g. Chomsky) and these innate grammar structures constrain language development. Constructivist theories state that children acquire competence with a language mainly through cultural learning and other cognitive processes (e.g. categorization; analogy). In constructivist theories, children are biologically prepared for language but only in general ways (e.g. capacities for cultural learning).  

An utterance refers to the smallest unit in which a person expresses a complete communicative intention (e.g. ‘give’). It is used to direct a recipient’s attention to something and to express a communicative motive (e.g. through an emotional expression). A child needs to understand the communicative intention of an utterance before the child can use it. Adults help this by stressing the word in a sentence. When a child does not understand the sub-functions of an utterance, the child will not be able to use it in different situations (e.g. novel situations).

Children learn words by attempting to understand utterances. To understand utterances, children often need to determine the functional role of a word. To learn a new word, children must extract it from a larger utterance and connect it to the relevant aspect of the current situation. Children learn the function of an utterance or word and this is how they begin to learn language.

A linguistic construction refers to a unit of language that comprises multiple linguistic elements used together for a relatively coherent communicative function. The elements also perform sub-functions. Constructions vary in their complexity depending on the number of elements and interrelations and they also vary in their abstractness. This makes that people know the general profile of an event in a sentence without knowing anything about individual content words (i.e. grammatical structure tells us who does what).

Holophrases refer to one-unit utterances with an intonational contour expressing communicative motive. Children begin speaking language by using holophrases. The initial schemas and constructions of children are very concrete and are organized around particular words and phrases instead of around abstract categories. The utterance-level constructions underlying children’s earliest multi-word utterances have three types:

  1. Word combinations (18 months)
    This refers to a combination of two words or holophrases in situations in which they both are relevant, with both words having equivalent status (e.g. ball table).
.....read more
Access: 
Public
Dehaene (2011). Small heads for big calculations.” – Article summary

Dehaene (2011). Small heads for big calculations.” – Article summary

Image

People do not have innate mechanisms for complex calculations (e.g. math). However, children typically do spontaneously come up with some form of counting without being explicitly taught. It may be that counting knowledge is innate but it is also possible that this develops through imitation and that children, while being able to count, do not know the meaning of these numbers.

At three and a half years of age, children know that the order in which one recites numerals is crucial. Young children are able to point out subtle counting errors (e.g. count something twice) and by four years of age, children have mastered the basics of how to count. Children do not know the meaning of counting until the end of their fourth year.

Children tend to come up with calculation algorithms without explicit instruction (e.g. adding numbers up using their fingers). Children initially have big difficulties in counting without their fingers and may explicitly state their process (i.e. name what they are doing), though this requires a lot of effort and concentration. The minimum strategy refers to starting an addition equation with the larger quantity and count a number of times equal to the smaller of the two numbers (e.g. 4 + 2 = four, five, six, six!). This strategy underlies most of children’s calculations before the onset of formal schooling. Children develop an intuitive understanding of commutativity (i.e. a+b=b+a) without any formal schooling. Between the ages of 4 and 7, children exhibit an intuitive understanding of what calculations mean and how they should best be selected.

Young adults rarely solve addition and multiplication problems by counting but retrieve results from a memorized table. Accessing this table takes longer as the operands get larger. This may be due to the accuracy of mental representations dropping with number size (1), order of acquisition influencing memory (2) and the amount of drilling (i.e. less training with larger number sizes because they are less common) (3). This means that memory plays a central role in adult mental arithmetic.

The multiplication table is more difficult to retain in memory because arithmetic factors are not arbitrary and independent of each other. Human memory is associative (i.e. it links events with each other). This permits the reconstruction of memories on the basis of fragmented information. It allows one to remember a lot with only a small piece of information (1), it allows one to take advantage of analogies (2) and it allows one to apply knowledge acquired under other circumstances to a novel situation (3). However, associative memory is a weakness when knowledge must be kept from interfering with each other. This means that when one wants to remember the answer to 7x5, all the associated arithmetic functions (e.g. 7x6) are also activated, making it more difficult to remember.

The automatization of arithmetic memory (e.g. seeing two numbers and automatically adding them up) starts at age seven. It is possible that children eventually

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Bjorklund (2012). Children’s thinking: Cognitive development and individual differences.” – Article summary

Bjorklund (2012). Children’s thinking: Cognitive development and individual differences.” – Article summary

Image

Primates have been able to learn simple language. However, this may not actually be language use and comprehending as they do not use complex grammar (1), lack social-cognitive abilities that allow for language learning (2) and lack a theory of mind (3). Language may have co-evolved with social intelligence.

Language refers to the systematic and conventional use of sounds, signs or written symbols for the intention of communication or self-expression. Human language differs from the communication of other animals in three ways:

  • Human language is symbolic (i.e. it represents something independent of the sound)
  • Human language is grammatical.
  • Human language varies with culture.\

There are seven functions of language:

  1. Instrumental (i.e. express needs).
  2. Regulatory (i.e. tell others wat to do).
  3. Personal (i.e. express feelings, opinions and individual identity).
  4. Interactional (i.e. make contact and form relationships).
  5. Heuristic (i.e. gain knowledge about the environment).
  6. Imaginative (i.e. tell stories and jokes to create an imaginative environment).
  7. Representational (i.e. convey facts and information)

Language consists of phonology (1), morphology (2), syntax (3), semantics (4) and pragmatics (5).

Phonology refers to the sounds of a language. There are age-related changes in the tongue, mouth and the larynx which allow for producing sounds. There are several stages of phonological development:

  1. Reflexive crying and vegetative sounds (0 to 8 weeks)
  2. Cooing and laughter (8 to 20 weeks)
  3. Vocal play (16 to 30 weeks) (i.e. uttering single syllables with vowel or consonant sounds)
  4. Reduplicated babbling (25 to 50 weeks) (e.g. bababa)
  5. Jargon (9 to 18 months)

Babbling consists of many non-repeated consonant-vowel patterns. Jargon babbling refers to strings of sound filled with a variety of intonations and rhythms to sound like meaningful speech. Speech production driven before 6 months of age is driven by internal forces rather than the environment. Babbling may have the function of socially relating to family members and it may reflect infants’ sensitivity to and production of patterns in the linguistic input. Phonemic awareness refers to the knowledge that words consists of separable sounds. This is important in proficient reading and phonemic awareness may improve by learning to read.

Morphology refers to the structure of words and to a system of rules for combining units of meaning into words (e.g. adding ‘ed’ to a word makes it past tense). A morpheme refers to the smallest unit of meaning in a language. Free morphemes can stand alone as words (e.g. fire; run). Bound morphemes cannot stand alone and are attached to free morphemes (e.g. the letter ‘s’). The mean length of utterance refers to the average number of morphemes a child uses in a sentence and is indicative of children’s linguistic development. Many of the morphemes children learn are word endings and they tend to show overregularization (i.e. overusing a rule; ‘s’ for every word that is plural).

The wug test

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Spilt, van Lier, Leflot, Onghena, & Colpin (2014). Children’s social self-concept and internalizing problems: The influence of peers and teachers.” – Article summary

Spilt, van Lier, Leflot, Onghena, & Colpin (2014). Children’s social self-concept and internalizing problems: The influence of peers and teachers.” – Article summary

Image

It is not clear what through what processes peer rejection lead to internalizing problems and how the teacher can be a protective factor in this. School-age children who experience difficulties in their relationships with peers are at increased risk for psychopathology. Social self-concept act as a mechanism through which peer rejection influences the development of internalizing problems.

The social self-concept refers to cognitive self-perceptions of one’s functioning in the social domain and this is negatively influenced by peer rejection. A poor self-concept is a cognitive vulnerability factor leading to the development of internalizing problems.

Teacher-student relationships are predictive of internalizing problems and self-perceptions. Supportive teacher-student relationships may compensate for the negative effect of peer rejection on children’s self-concept. This means that good teacher-student relationships could be a protective factor against the negative effect of peer rejection on one’s social self-concept.

Peer rejection predicts declines in social self-concept and this is negatively associated with internalizing problems. Impeded social self-concept is the mechanism through which peer rejection leads to internalizing problems. Disliked children may receive more negative treatment from peers and this negative feedback may be internalized over time.

Individual teacher support may have a protective factor, though this is not clear. Medium-high to high levels of teacher support protected children’s social self-concept against peer rejection but only at the end of the second grade. This means that teacher support can at least buffer the effects of peer problems on children’s self-concept. However, teachers are not able to alleviate the full burden of peer rejection.

It is possible that the link between maladaptive self-cognitions and internalizing outcomes becomes stronger with age as children’s cognitive abilities mature.

 

Access: 
Public
Susperreguy, Davis-Kean, Duckworth, & Chen (2018). Self-concept predicts academic achievement across level of the achievement distribution: domain specificity for math and reading.” – Article summary

Susperreguy, Davis-Kean, Duckworth, & Chen (2018). Self-concept predicts academic achievement across level of the achievement distribution: domain specificity for math and reading.” – Article summary

Image

Self-concept of ability refers to the perception of one’s capability to successfully perform on academic tasks. This may explain academic achievement. It is possible that young children successfully perform various academic skills which develops a positive view on those skills, making it more likely that they engage with these skills and become proficient in them. A positive perception of skill could be increased by peer comparison and positive feedback.

When a student feels competent, this sense of ability may enhance one’s self-concept, allowing the student to persist at and seek out activities that further influence academic achievement. This means that a positive self-perception of abilities may promote academic achievement.

Early math achievement predicts later math achievement even when controlling or child characteristics, background and demographic variables and early reading achievement also predicts later math achievement.

Self-concept of ability in math between the ages 9 and 14 is related to later math achievement even when taking into account earlier math and reading achievement and other variables (e.g. demographics). Self-concept of ability in reading in middle childhood is not related to later math achievement. This association holds across the achievement spectrum (i.e. high- and low achievers).

Self-concept of ability in reading in middle school predicts later reading achievement even when taking into account earlier achievement and other variables. Self-concept of math does not predict reading achievement. This relationship holds across he achievement spectrum but there is a smaller association between reading self-concept and reading achievement when achievement is high compared to when achievement is lower.

Self-concept of ability plays an important role in motivating achievement over time and across achievement levels. It is possible that these beliefs playa  stronger role for students not achieving at higher levels.

 

 

Access: 
Public
Traub & Boynton-Jarrett (2017). Modifiable resilience factors to childhood adversity for clinical pediatric practice.” – Article summary

Traub & Boynton-Jarrett (2017). Modifiable resilience factors to childhood adversity for clinical pediatric practice.” – Article summary

Image

Early childhood adversity is common (i.e. 48% - 60%). Early life trauma impacts the developmental trajectory of children and health outcomes over the life course. No experiences with maltreatment and a non-depressed primary caregiver are associated with resilience. Adult health outcomes are influenced by the cumulative incidence of adverse life experiences. Differences in risk are influenced by chronicity (1), severity (2), contextual factors (3) an type of childhood traumas (4).

Resilience refers to good mental and physical health despite early adverse life events. This means that it includes a ability to withstand, adapt to and recover from adversities. It may buffer a child from adversity by reducing the impact of trauma (1), reducing negative chain reactions stemming from trauma (2) and it may enable opportunities for recovery (3).

Resilience results from the interplay between a child’s genetics (1), temperament (2), knowledge and skills (3), past experiences (4), social supports (5), cultural resources (6) and societal resources (7). High self-esteem (1), internal locus of control (2), external attributions of blame (3), optimism (4), determination in the face of adversity (5), cognitive flexibility (6), reappraisal ability (7), social competence (8) and the ability to face fears (9) are resilience factors.

There are five modifiable resilience factors:

  1. Positive appraisal style and executive function skills (i.e. individual)
    A positive appraisal style refers to optimism and confidence in one’s ability to manage adversity. This is modifiable via experience and explicit CBT. Executive function is modifiable through educational approaches on narrow executive functions, computer training programmes on broad executive functions, aerobic exercise and mindfulness training. Executive function especially promotes resilience when it comes to cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control.
  2. Parenting (i.e. family)
    Responsive parenting and good parental relationships foster resilience. Positive parenting could normalize HPA-axis activity (i.e. cortisol level).
  3. Maternal mental health (i.e. family)
    This is associated with risk for trauma and less sensitive parenting. Screening for, identifying and treating it could foster resilience and prevent trauma. Depressed mothers are less responsive and use more punitive disciplinary measures. A history of adverse life experiences for the mothers leads to more difficulties in modulating their own stress response and teaching coping to their children.
     A mother’s self-efficacy regarding parenting also promotes resilience.
  4. Self-care skills and household routines (i.e. family)
    Adverse life events are associated with poor sleep, nutrition and exercise habits. Teaching self-care skills and using consistent routines and caregiving at home could promote resilience.
  5. Trauma understanding (i.e. individual and family)
    Children with trauma rarely speak of it and often do not understand the relationship between their experiences and how they feel and act. Educating children and families about traumas could promote resilience through trauma-focused interventions.

Paediatric primary care could enhance resilience to childhood adversity. Barriers to the identification and treatment of trauma in paediatrics include a perceived lack of time (1), lack of training (2), lack of reimbursement (3) and a reluctance to

.....read more
Access: 
Public
Follow the author: JesperN
Comments, Compliments & Kudos:

Add new contribution

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Promotions
vacatures

JoHo kan jouw hulp goed gebruiken! Check hier de diverse studentenbanen die aansluiten bij je studie, je competenties verbeteren, je cv versterken en een bijdrage leveren aan een tolerantere wereld

Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org


Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams

How and why would you use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?

  • For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
  • For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
  • For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
  • For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
  • For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.

Using and finding summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter

There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.

  1. Use the menu above every page to go to one of the main starting pages
    • Starting pages: for some fields of study and some university curricula editors have created (start) magazines where customised selections of summaries are put together to smoothen navigation. When you have found a magazine of your likings, add that page to your favorites so you can easily go to that starting point directly from your profile during future visits. Below you will find some start magazines per field of study
  2. Use the topics and taxonomy terms
    • The topics and taxonomy of the study and working fields gives you insight in the amount of summaries that are tagged by authors on specific subjects. This type of navigation can help find summaries that you could have missed when just using the search tools. Tags are organised per field of study and per study institution. Note: not all content is tagged thoroughly, so when this approach doesn't give the results you were looking for, please check the search tool as back up
  3. Check or follow your (study) organizations:
    • by checking or using your study organizations you are likely to discover all relevant study materials.
    • this option is only available trough partner organizations
  4. Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
    • by following individual users, authors  you are likely to discover more relevant study materials.
  5. Use the Search tools
    • 'Quick & Easy'- not very elegant but the fastest way to find a specific summary of a book or study assistance with a specific course or subject.
    • The search tool is also available at the bottom of most pages

Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?

Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance

Field of study

Check the related and most recent topics and summaries:
Activity abroad, study field of working area:
Institutions, jobs and organizations:
Access level of this page
  • Public
  • WorldSupporters only
  • JoHo members
  • Private
Statistics
1609