Confounding and deconfounding: or, slaying the lurking variable - summary of an article by Pearl (2018)

Critical thinking
Article: Pearl (2018)
Confounding and deconfounding: or, slaying the lurking variable

Introduction

Confounding bias occurs when a variable influences both who is selected for the treatment and he outcome of the experiment.
Sometimes the confounders are known. Other times they are merely suspected and act as a ‘lurking third variable’.

If we have measurements of the third variable, then it is very easy to deconfound the true and spurious effects.

Statisticians both over- and underrate the importance of adjusting for possible confounders

  • Overrate in the sense that they often control for many more variables than they need to and even for variables that they should not control for
  • Underrate in the sense that they are loath to talk about causality at all, even if the controlling has been done correctly.

The chilling fear of confounding

Knowing the set of assumptions that stand behind a given conclusion is not less valuable than attempting to circumvent those assumptions with and RCT, which has complications on its own.

The skillful interrogation of nature: why RCTs work

The one circumstance under which scientists will abandon some of their reticence to talk about causality is when they have conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Randomization brings two benefits:

  • It eliminates confounder bias
  • It enables the researcher to quantify his uncertainty

Another ways is, if you know what all the possible counfounders are, to measure and adjust for them.
But, randomization had one great advantage: it servers every incoming link to the randomized variable, including the ones we don’t know about or cannot measure.

RCTs are preferred to observational studies.
But, in some cases, intervention may be physically impossible or unethical.

Provisional causality: causality contingent upon the set of assumptions that our causal diagram advertises.

The principal objective of an RCT is to eliminate confounding.

The new paradigm of confounding

Confounding is not a statistical notion. It stands for the discrepancy between what we want to assess (the causal effect) and what we actually do assess using statistical methods.
If you can’t articulate mathematically what you want to assess, you can’t expect to define what constitutes a discrepancy.

Historically, the concept of ‘confounding’ has evolved around two related conceptions:

  • Incomparability
  • A lurking third variable.

Both these concepts have resisted formalization.

The do-operator and the back-door criterion

Confounding: anything that makes P(Y|do(X)) differ from P(Y|X).
The do-operator erases all the arrows that come into X, and in this way prevents any information about X from flowing in the noncausal direction.
Randomization has the same effect. So does statistical adjustment, if we pick the right variables to adjust.

Three rules that tell us how to stop the flow of information through any individual junction.

  • The chain junction. A → B → C.
    Controlling for B prevents information about A from getting to C or vice versa.
  • Fork or confounding junction A ← B → C.
    Controlling for B prevents information about A from getting to C or vice versa.
  • A collider. A → B ← C.
    The variables A and C start out independent, so that information about A tells you nothing about C. But if you control for B, then information starts flowing though the ‘pipe’ due to the explain-away effect.

Controlling for descendants (or proxies) of a variable is like ‘partially’ controlling for the variable itself. Controlling for a descendant of a mediator partly closes the pipe, controlling for a descendant of a collider partly opens the pipe.

To deconfound two variables X and Y, we need only block every non-causal path between them without blocking or perturbing any casual paths.
A back-door path: any path from X to Y that starts with an arrow pointing into X.
X and Y will be deconfounded if we block every back-door path.
If we do this by controlling for some set of variables Z, we also need to make sure that no member of Z is a descendant of X on a causal path, otherwise we might partly or completely close off that path.

Image

Access: 
Public

Image

Join WorldSupporter!
This content is used in:

WSRt, critical thinking - a summary of all articles needed in the second block of second year psychology at the uva

Search a summary

Image

 

 

Contributions: posts

Help other WorldSupporters with additions, improvements and tips

Add new contribution

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Image

Spotlight: topics

Check the related and most recent topics and summaries:
Institutions, jobs and organizations:
Activity abroad, study field of working area:
Countries and regions:
This content is also used in .....

Image

Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org

Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams

How and why use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?

  • For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
  • For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
  • For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
  • For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
  • For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.

Using and finding summaries, notes and practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter

There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.

  1. Use the summaries home pages for your study or field of study
  2. Use the check and search pages for summaries and study aids by field of study, subject or faculty
  3. Use and follow your (study) organization
    • by using your own student organization as a starting point, and continuing to follow it, easily discover which study materials are relevant to you
    • this option is only available through partner organizations
  4. Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
  5. Use the menu above each page to go to the main theme pages for summaries
    • Theme pages can be found for international studies as well as Dutch studies

Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?

Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance

Main summaries home pages:

Main study fields:

Main study fields NL:

Follow the author: SanneA
Work for WorldSupporter

Image

JoHo can really use your help!  Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world

Working for JoHo as a student in Leyden

Parttime werken voor JoHo

Statistics
4165