Social Psychology by Smith, E, R (fourth edition) a summary
- 3422 reads
Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>
Social psychology
Chapter 11
Interaction and performance in groups
Interdependence: each group member’s throughts, emotions, and behaviors influence the others’.
Social facilitation: improvement and impairment
Even when interdependence is minimal, the mere presence of others can produce arousal, either because the other people are highly evaluative or because they are distracting.
Social facilitation: an increase in the likelihood of hihgly accessible responses, and a decrease in the likelihood of less accessible responses, due to the persence of others.
Even the virtual presence of virutal others can cause these effects.
Evaluation apprehension
When we focus on what other people think about us, it creates arousal, with sometimes postive and sometimes negative effects on performance.
Most of the time, we want other people to value, include, and like us. Ou self-esteem is greatly affected by what others think of us.
The presence of others who are in a posititon to judge us produces evaluation apprehension, which changes our performance in the way predicted by social facilitation theory.
Distraction
The presence of others can also disctract us from our task, also creating arousal and impacting performance. However, with specific types of tasks, distraction can focus us on taks-relevant cues, potentially improving performance.
Others can distract us.
Their mere presence causes us to think about them, to react to them, or to monitor what they are doing, and thereby deflects attention from the task at hand.
Our impulses to do two different things at once, conentrate on the task and to react to others, start to conflict wich each other, we become agitated and aroused.
This arousal will typically improve performance on simple tasks and interfere with it on difficult tasks.
The presence of others also requires people to split their attention between the other people and the task at hand.
Being crowded is arousing because crowds create many opportunities for evaluation and distraction.
Task interdependence: reliance on other members of a group for mastery of material outcomes that arise from the group’s task.
Social interependence: relieance on other members of the group for feelings of connectedenss, social and emotional rewards, and a positive social identity.
How groups change: stages of group development
Face-to-face groups usually go through different stages of relationship with their members.
At the same time, groups to through formation, conflict, development of norms, performance, and dissolution as they try to maximize social en task interdependence to develop an identity and reach their groals. Time pressure can affect how groups solve these problems.
Group socialization: mutual evaluation by members and groups
Group socialization: the cognitive, affective, and behavioral changes that occur as individuals join and leave groups.
An ongoing process of mutual evaluation from both the individual member’s and the group’s perspectives.
When the individual feels that the group offers a better chance of meeting his or her needs than alternative group memberships, the individual becomes commited to the group.
When the group feels that the individual offers a better chance of fulfilling group goals than other potential members, the group is also committed to the individual.
These processes of evaluation and mutual commitment define the various stages of relationship that members can have with their groups.
Initialy, groups try to size up potential members who might contribute to the group good and help the group succeed, whilde individuals at the same time assess the extent to which groups help satisfy personal needs for mastery and connectedness.
If this initual evaluation leads to the individual to commit to the group and vice versa, the individual becomes a new member of the group.
Entry to the group triggers socialization.
The group triees to mold the individual into a ‘team player’ who can help achieve goals.
The individual tries to shape the group so that it meets as many of his or her needs as possible, both for task mastery and for social connections.
To the extent that individuals and groups like what they see in each other at this stage, their mutual commitment may rise again. Such commitment to the group makes individuals adopt group values, feel good about fellow members, and work hard to achieve group goals and maintain membership in the group.
Commitment to the individual makes the group value, like, and seek to keep the individual as a member.
Sometimes groups might be reluctant to commit to a new group member, especially if they know that the newcomer isn’t pernament.
Once the individual is a fully commited member, the relationship enters the maintenance phase.
The group tries to find a specific role for the individual that maximizes his or her contribution. The individual tries to find a role that maximizes the satisfaction he or she can obtain from the group.
If this role negotiation succeeds, mutual commitment remains hihg and membership works will from both perspectives.
Because the group and its members must be mutually commited to one another, those who want to join and remain in the goup must be careful not to upset the group n ways that might lead to hteir ousting.
Group development: coming together, falling apart
The overall interaction patterns among all the members of the group go through different stages as they try to coordinate task interdependence and enchance social interdependence.
Although some groups go through all five of the stages, many others skip steps, repeat steps, recycle through many of the steps, or dissolve before they ever reach the later stages.
Five stages:
Time and group development
Times has other effects on the ways groups interact and deal with their tasks.
Time growing short may trigger a radically different approach to the group’s task, shift in strategies, and a greater emphasis on productive work.
Groups that spend part of their early planning on timing issues will perform better.
Time pressure alteres the way groups approach their tasks. Groups under time pressure devote more of their interaction to clearly task-focused matters and differ from less pressured groups in the ways they share information and seek to influence each other. Increased task focus.
Time pressure also has it costs. Less creative and original and groups under time pressure tend to find worse solutions in decision-making.
Being pushed out of groups: rejection and ostracism
When existing group members decide to actively remove someone from the group, social rejection has occurred.
Ostracism: being ignored and excluded from a group.
Being rejected or ostracized from groups can have profound effecs on a person.
Compared to being included, ostracizedd in Cyberball leads people to report lower levels of belonging, self-esteem, control and a sense of a meaningful existence.
Even ostracism by others we deplore can have the same effect.
Areas of the brain that are active in response of physical pain are activated during ostracism and their sensitivity to physical pain changes.
Ostracism and rejection have potent effect on people’s perceptions, motivations, and behaviors.
People who are rejected or ostracized want to recapure affiliation with other people.
Getting the job done: group performance
To achieve their performance goals, groups must maintain their motivation and avoid problems of coordination. Proccesses including communication within the group and shared emotions can influence group performance. Training and accountability can improve performance, but perhaps the most important is developing a common social identity, which helps avoid performance problems by attracting and keeping valuable group members and by enouraging acceptance of group goals and normative cooperation.
Forms of task interdependence
Groups differ in terms of the type of interdependence they require.
Most tasks are complex tasks, which consists of subtasks that involve all forms of interdependence.
The more complicated the task, the greater the need for planning and coordination to ensure that member’s skills and efforts are appropriately allocated. And the greater the opportunity will be for the group’s performance to multiply and surpass any possible effort by a single individual.
Also many opporutinities for things to go wrong.
Gains and losses in group performance
Groups do perform many tasks better than an individual could.
But
Losses from decreased motivation: social loafing
Social loafing: the tendency to exert less effort on a task when an individual’s efforts are an unidentifiable part of a group than when the same task is performed alone.
Sharing responsibility can reduce effort no matter the task.
People may even ‘preloaf’ by preparing less for an upcoming group task then they do for an upcoming individual one.
Why do people loaf in group tasks?
To loaf or not to loaf seems to depend on motivation.
When individual performance is important for task mastery, social loafing declines.
The same when an individual’s performance has implications for connectedness to the group.
Social compensation: one group member working especially hard to compensate for another’s low level of effort or performance.
Sometimees the wakes or least capable group members work harder in groups than they do alone, possible because social comparison with other, better-performing group members inspires more effort.
Lossess from poor coordination
The group needs to be organized if it is to do the best possible work.
Members need assigned roles and a clear sense of their resources.
They also need to be aware of one another’s strenghts and weaknesses, how their actions contribute to group goals, and of who has a right to command and who has a duty to obey.
Coordination in groups is often achieved via explicit communication, when group members directly spell out who should do what tasks.
Coordination can slo be tacit, occuring without explicit communication.
Shared social knowledge is especially important for tacit coordination.
Processes that affect performance: group communication
Groups have one primary weapon in the struggle to achieve high task efficiency while maintaining cohesion: communication.
A high level of open communication does contribute to overall group performance.
The balance between task-focused and socially-focused communications is crucial if a group is to be effective.
The optimal type and amound of communication depend on several factors.
Technology and communication
Groups often interact through technology instead of in person.
These new technologies influence both how tasks are completed and how group members feel as they complete them.
Computer-mediated group decision making may be less vulnerable to problems like the premature consensus of groupthink and biases that polarize majority views.
And more equal participation among members.
Overall, technology-mediated groups took longer to reach a decision, made poorer quality decisions, and group members were less satisfied with their decisions compared to groups who communicated face-to-face.
It may not feel very good to interact in technology-mediated groups either. It may damage group commitment and reduce positive emotions in groups.
Different types of computer-mediated communication may have unique problems.
Face-to-face communication is still preferre in many instances.
The emotional ties that develop from actual interaction seem essential for the growth of interpersonal trust and commitment, as well as group solidarity.
Physical proximity seems to be essential for this type of frequent, informal interaction.
Processes that affect performance: emotions and mood in groups
The emotional ties that form between group members can force for good, helping to develop trust and commitment.
A group’s emotional climate or mood can affect performance in many ways.
These group moods may arise trough contagion, with the moods of one or more members spreading to many other group members.
These consequences are evident to outside observers as well as to the group members themselves.
Both the content of group emotions and the consistency of emotions across members shape observers’ impressions.
Cures for group performance losses
Communication and shared emotions do not always do the trick.
Building positive social interdependence often helps solve some of the problems of task interdependence.
There is a positive correlation between group cohesion and better performance.
Social identity can be such a powerful tool that it sometimes holds groups together when no material benefits are forthcoming.
Leadership and power
Effective leaders enhance task performance and maintain social interdependence. The ways they do this must differ from situation to situation. Sometimes, however, stereotypical thinking prevents the most effective leaders from emering in groups. Some types of leadership are particularly likely to help align individual and group goals and these leaders may help groups be particularly successful. Of course, such extraordinary influence can be used in destructive as well as constructive wasy. Formal group leaders as well as others (such as parents) usually can control other people’s outcomes, such as power has a numer of psychological effects.
Leadership: a process in which one or more group members are permitted to influence and motivate others to help attain group goals.
What do leaders do?
The exercise of leadership generally involves two distinct types of behavior:
Task-related leader behaviors include:
Relationship-oriented leadership involves:
Relation-oriented leadership appears to be especially important when work groups are diverse rather than homogeneous.
In general, diversity can have both positive and negative effects on groups.
Leader behavior strongly influences whether group diversity will hurt or help in these ways.
A match between leader mood and follower characteristics may be important.
Leadership effectiveness: Person or situation?
Studies have revealed that the same person could be an effective leader in one context, but ineffective in another.
Group success depends less on who the leader is than on what kind of leadership is needed in a particular situation.
Contingency theories of leadership: theories holding that leader behaviors can differ and that different behaviors are most effective in specific leadership situations.
The leader’s style should match the type of leadership demanded by the situation.
Althoug some specific tasks may be best matched by a task-focused or relationship-oriented leader, most complex tasks require both leadership styles.
The essence of good leadership may be the flexibility to adjust the mix of social and task motivation that a group needs in a particular situation.
Leadership is about the flexible exercise of social influence.
Who becomes leader?
People seem to have ideas about who is ‘leader material’ regardless of the task at hand.
Stereotypes and leadership
Common stereotypes influence people’s perceptions of leadership.
People are seen as leaders when their appearance fits stereotyipcally with what they say.
Putting group first: transformational leadership
Whereas most leaders help followers reach existing goals, charismatic leaders may actually change their followers’ goals.
Transformational leadership: leaders who inspire extreme devotion and emotional identification on the part of their followers, allowing them to have profound effects on their followers.
To have these profound effects, transformational leaders must be self-confident and determined, as well as skilled and inspiring communicators.
They take clear an strong stands that empathize commitment to goals, optimistically express an attractive vision of the future, question old assumptions and traditions, and are highly carign toward group members.
Studies of leaders who exhibit these kinds of behaviors suggest that they are successful in promoting not only organizational commitment and work satisfaction, but also group performance.
Transformational practices ten to empower followers, creating a sense of control that thelps explain the succes of such leadership.
Transformational leaders are effective for exactly the same reasons as other leaders: they nurture cohesion among group members and inspire them to adopt the group’s goals as their own. These factors in turn inspire group members to look beyond themselves and adopt new collective goals for the group, eliminating potential coordination and motivation losses in the process.
The dark side of leadership
Groups and group memebers can pay high cost for poor leadership.
When leaders lead the wrong way, group members who can do so will withdraw from the group, hurting their own, group’s, and the leader’s changes of achieving the goal that brought the group together in the first place.
Under bad leaders, task motivation abbs away and group members not only fail to perform, but can actively attempt to undermine the leader’s agenda and the group’s goals.
Even the life-changing potential of charismatic or transformational leadership can have a dark side.
Power
Power: the ability to provide or withold rewards or punishments from others.
Not only do powerful people seem to pursue goals differently, but they prefer to pursue certain types of goals more than others, especially those focused on rewards and those that thelp maintain their power.
Either too much power or too little power within a group can harm performance.
This is a summary of the book Social Psychology by Smith. It is an introduction to social psychology and is about human behaviour in relation to groups and other humans. This book is used in the course 'Social psychology' in the first year of the study Psychology at the
...There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.
Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?
Field of study
JoHo can really use your help! Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world
2344 |
Add new contribution