“Willingham (2007). Decision making an deductive reasoning.” – Article summary

People do not reason logically, but decision making encompasses all human behaviour. Choices can be rational (internally consistent). People expect choices to show transitivity. If a relationship holds between item one and item two and between item two and item three then the relationship should also hold between item one and item three. Utility is the personal value we attach to outcomes rather than to their absolute monetary value.

Normative theories of decision making imply that some choices are better than other choices. The optimal choice in normative theories depends on the theory.

The expected value theory states that the optimal choice is the choice that offers the largest financial payoff. People also tend to go for choices with the maximum utility. People are not always consistent in their choices with expected value and utility, as this requires a lot of time and motivation. There are two principles in rational decision making:

  1. Description invariance
    The description of the choice should not make any difference as long as basic structure of the choices is the same.
  2. Procedure invariance
    The procedure of decision making should not make any difference in the decision that people make.

People are inconsistent with this. Psychic budgets refers to how we mentally categorize money that we have spent or are contemplating to spend. Sunk cost refers to an investment that is irretrievably spent and should not influence present decision making, but still does, as people want to get their investment out of it as much as they can. People also make decisions based on loss aversion, the unpleasantness of a loss is bigger than the pleasure of a similar gain. Therefore, people make decisions based on aversion of the unpleasantness of a loss. Satisficing refers to selecting the first choice that satisfies a certain demand (e.g: cost of a phone). People use satisficing to prevent them from having to compare everything with each other.

People tend to use heuristics to make decisions. There are several heuristics:

  1. Representativeness heuristic
    An event is judged to be probable if it has properties that are representative of that category (e.g: we believe a person wearing a metal t-shirt is more likely to be part of a metal band than someone in a suit).
  2. Availability heuristic
    An event is judged more probable if one is able to recall many examples of it (e.g: deadliness of plane crashes versus cardiovascular diseases).
  3. Anchoring and adjustment heuristic
    The initial value of an event adjusts or estimate upwards or downwards on the basis of other information (e.g: if people first hear that someone wants an offer between 10 and 50 euros, they will have a lower offer than when people hear that someone wants an offer between 50 and 150 euros).

The odds of a conjunction of two events are always lower than the odds of a single event. The gambler’s fallacy refers to gamblers making decisions on what they believe should happen (e.g: after 6 times red in a row with roulette, they believe it should be black, as that is more random). People tend to ignore base rate and sample size when making decisions. Heuristics often provide sufficient decisions and are not necessarily maladaptive.

People are not flawless in deductive reasoning, deriving the answer using formal logic. Premises are statements of fact that are presumed to be true. Inductive reasoning shows that a conclusion is more or less likely to be true, but it does not allow us to conclude that the conclusion must be true.

Example deductive reasoning:

P1: If A, then B
P2: A
----------------------
C: B

Example inductive reasoning:
P1: If A, then B
P2: B
---------------------
A

Inductive reasoning is not necessarily is true, as A is not the valid answer here. Syllogisms make use of the if-then format. There are several forms of syllogisms:

  1. Modus ponens (valid)
    If A, then B
    A
    -----------------
    B
  2. Modus tollens (valid)
    If A, then B
    Not B
    ----------------
    Not A
  3. Affirming the consequent (invalid)
    If A, then B
    B
    ----------------
    A
  4. Denying the antecedent (invalid)
    If A, then B
    Not A
    ------------
    Not B

People tend to do the modus ponens and the modus tollens correct. They tend to make mistakes in affirming the consequent and denying the antecedent, as people believe they are valid. People are better at reasoning using formal logic if it is concrete (e.g. no abstract phrasings) and if the problem is familiar.

Pragmatic reasoning schemas are generalized sets of rules that are defined in relation to goals. They lead to inferences that are pragmatic, whereas formal reasoning might lead to valid conclusions, but not necessarily practical conclusions. People tend to be good at exposing and recognizing people that break social rules using reasoning.

People tend to make a conversion error, in which the person reverses terms that should not be reversed (e.g. all and some). Conversational implicature refers to people using terms in the conversational sense rather than the logical sense. People also tend to make mistakes because of the atmosphere of the premises (e.g. both premises are negative or both premises use ‘some’). People also make mistakes in syllogisms because of prior beliefs.
 

Image

Access: 
Public

Image

Join WorldSupporter!
This content is used in:

Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Article summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)

Search a summary

Image

 

 

Contributions: posts

Help other WorldSupporters with additions, improvements and tips

Add new contribution

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Image

Spotlight: topics

Check the related and most recent topics and summaries:
Institutions, jobs and organizations:
Activities abroad, study fields and working areas:
This content is also used in .....

Image

Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org

Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams

How and why use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?

  • For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
  • For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
  • For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
  • For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
  • For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.

Using and finding summaries, notes and practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter

There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.

  1. Use the summaries home pages for your study or field of study
  2. Use the check and search pages for summaries and study aids by field of study, subject or faculty
  3. Use and follow your (study) organization
    • by using your own student organization as a starting point, and continuing to follow it, easily discover which study materials are relevant to you
    • this option is only available through partner organizations
  4. Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
  5. Use the menu above each page to go to the main theme pages for summaries
    • Theme pages can be found for international studies as well as Dutch studies

Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?

Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance

Main summaries home pages:

Main study fields:

Main study fields NL:

Follow the author: JesperN
Work for WorldSupporter

Image

JoHo can really use your help!  Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world

Working for JoHo as a student in Leyden

Parttime werken voor JoHo

Statistics
2145