Commitment and consistency
- Cognitive dissonance
- Self-perception
- Social norm
- Self-persuasion
Question
- Dice game
- Make a bet: what number?
- How confident are you about your bet? (5-point-likert scale)
Self-persuasion
- We are more confident about our chances of winning AFTER placing a bet than immediately before laying down a bet
- Convince our self we have made the right choice and feel better about the choice (self-persuasion)
- More satisfied about purchases when you have made your decision
- Products have more favorable and less unfavorable aspects when choices have been made
- Minimalize regret
- With which question can you increase voting by 20% ? Do you expect to vote? (yes = social desirable)
Cognitive dissonance
- Discrepancy between beliefs and behavior causes psychological tension (cognitive dissonance)
- Motivated to reduce the discrepancy
- Changing beliefs or behavior
- After a (behavior) choice has been made: we fool ourselves to keep our belief consistent with what we have already done or decided: rationalize decision
Theory of self-concept maintenance
- A gain at the expense of honest self-concept
- Try to avoid negative update of self-concept: when starts this?
- What influences whether we update?
Negative update?
- Categorizing: act as less dishonest
- E.g. taking €1,- VS a pen
- Malleability (extent to which you can reinterpret: pen is borrowing, money is stealing)
- Limit (severity of dishonest behavior: taking someone’s life is bad bc you cant give it back)
- Attention to (own) moral standards
- Internal awereness
- Salience of moral standard, personal norms
Attention to moral standards
- 229 students
- Solve set of puzzles
- €10,- per solved puzzle
- X
- Manipulation
- Recall books
- Recall 10 commandments
- Control (experimenter checks answers)
- Recycle (take work sheet, report correct answers on paper)
If you set a person in front of the mirror they get more focused on their own personal norms
Self awareness
- Making personal norms more salient
- Ciadini et al.
- People are more inline with personal norm in front of a mirror
- In crime places there are placed a lot of mirrors: not only to see your personal norms, but also the idea that many people are able to see you.
If you can buy a stolen bike from someone in Groningen you probably would take a crappy student bike, but if the person wants to give you a beautiful mom-bike with 2 kids seats you are getting suspicious and won’t take it.
Justification: an experiment
- Tedious and meaningless tasks
- Evaluated very negatively
- Ask participants to persuade other students to participate as well
- Task rated more positively when €1, why? Because they make it nicer in their head; the intrinsic motivation gets greater
Self-perception theory
- Attitudes, emotions, and internal states are inferred from observations of own behavior (no dissonance relieve)
- I told the task was interesting, so I must have liked the exercise more than I originally thought
Advantages Self-perception
- Convenient, effortless, efficient (like all heuristics)
- Safe hiding place for troubling realizations
- Rather not aware of some things
- Easier to change beliefs than behavior
Experiment
- Children had to eat vegetables they did not like
- Some were told it was inevitable: they had to eat more in the future
- These children convinced themselves that it was not that bad
- Higher acceptance
- Like the vegetables more
Initiation ceremonies
- Value membership more if you have gone through a great deal of trouble to attain it
- Cognitive dissonance, self perception --> rationalize
- Increases commitment
- Increases group cohesion and chance of group survival
- Effort is an indicator for us how much we like a person (I do all this for this person, (s)he must me amazing) also with products: the more effort it takes to produce an object, the higher people rate the quality of the object, and the more they like the object (e.g. baking a cake yourself or only adding water): IKEA effect
- Ikea does the same: you buy the thing and you have to put it together yourself. The effort that is involved in this process makes you like the product more.
Effort: perception of other
- Symbolic attributes
- Your behavior signals who you are
- The more costly the behavior the stronger the signal (if a bio store is 20km away and you go there you really want to, if you buy bio in the nearest supermarket its less impressive)
Cognitive dissonance or self-perception?
- If people are certain about their behavior and underlying attritudes: cognitive dissonance
- If people have less experience with the behavior and no firm attitudes have been developed: self-perception
Consistency highly valued
- Inconsistent persons seen as confused, two-faced, mentally ill
- Consistency associated with personal and intellectual strength
- Consistency = logical, rational, stable, honest (something from the West: USA. Adapting is more valuable in the East)
- Once we make a choice or take a stand, we will encounter personal and interpersonal pressures to behave consistently with that commitment (norms)
Commitment
- Written or verbal pledge or promise to engage in specific actions
- People feel obligated to keep their promise
- Prevent feeling guilty, feel proud of yourself
- Bring self-image in line with action
- Think of new reasons to support decision (remember the dice)
Experiment
- Making reservation in restaurants
- No show was 30%
- What question reduced this to 10%? ‘Will you call if you have to cancel the reservation?”
- Experiment at 7:00 am
- 2 conditions:
- (1) inform students on time: 24% participants
- (2) first ask wheter they are willing to participate (56% yes, commitment), then mention time
- No one changed their mind
- 95% actually participated
- Setting: beach
- Confederate
- Conditions:
- Control
- Experimental: “could you please watch my things?”
Signing petition
- Researchers asked ½ of the residents in an apartment complex to sign a petition to create a recreation centre for the handicapted.
- 2 weeks later, all residents were approached and asked to donate money to the cause.
- This reflects a two-step process for the ½ of participations who signed the petition.
People want to be in line with their attitude and their behaviors.
Experiment: active VS passive commitments
- Volunteer for AIDS education project
- 1) active commitment: fill out form stating they wanted to participate
- 2) passive commitment: not filling out a form stating they didn’t want to participate (stand up if you… all the people who sit will promise something)
Our self-image is more in line with the things that we do, than the things that we don’t (I am a student, I work here… NOT: I am not a scholar, I don’t own a bike..)
We need more reasons for an action: sign for being a donor, why do I want to be a doner?
Public VS private commitments
- Public commitments are more effective than personal commitments
- Example: higher chance of hung juries when opinions are expressed visible show of hands rather than by secret ballot
Field experiment
- Energy conservation
- Conditions:
- Public commitment
- Private commitment
- Control group
- In case of public commitment lower rate increase in electricity consumption than other groups
- Reduce natural gas consumption
- Public commitment: names to be published in newspapers as fuel-conversing citizens
- Saved more energy than control group
- Names not published after all
- Even higher savings
- Rationalize own behavior? No external motivation/minimal justification?
Practice
True Love Waits. Safe yourself for after the marriage. This is done publicly (not in your room) at the age of 12/14. The ring is a beautiful reminder of the commitment; and everybody sees the ring so everyone knows you have made the commitment. You get reminded often.
Hypocrisy reduction
- Person makes a public commitment
- Asked to tell teenagers to practice safe sex
- Make them mindful of past failures to meet their commitment
- Fill out questionnaire on past sexual practice
- More likely to adopt advocated behavior
- More likely to practice safe sex
- Adjust behavior to expressed beliefs
- Cognitive dissonance: changing your behavior is a way out. But what if they change their believe? (I thought I wanted to stay save for my health but now I think about it I have smoked hundred of times so it must be not that important to me)
Written commitment
- Physical evidence
- Not able to deny or forget
- Can easily be made public
- Persuade public that the author believes what was written
- Tendency to think written statement reflect true attitudes, even if they know the person did not freely choose to write it down
Door-to-door sales companies
- Ask client to fill out the sale agreement, i.e. a written commitment
- I like …(brand/companie), because
- You start to believe more in what you have written
Commitment is more effective if
- Active
- Public
- Effortful
- Irreversible
- Freely chosen
- Accept inner responsibility
- Toy (robot) experiment: make promise to robot (you internalize it)
- No external attribution
- Changes in self-image (social desirable things)
Foot-in-the-door-technique
- Start small and build
- When people comply with a small request, ask them to comply with a more substantial once
- Initial commitment crucial factor
Why is this effective?
- Cognitive dissonance: I complied, so probably I agree
- Change self-image to be consistent with the deed
- Commitment
- Desire for consistency
- Even more extensive compliance may result that is consistent with new self-view
Self generated persuasion
- Design (subtle) situation so that the target group generated arguments in support of your position thereby persuading themselves
- Example: study by Lewin
- People who generated their own arguments for serving sweetbreads nearly 11 times more likely to actually serve it than people who attended a lecture
Labeling technique (self fulfilling prophecy)
- We adopt our behavior to the images others have of us
- Hidden self produce
- People who were told they were considered charitable people gave more money to charity
- People who were told they had a higher than average change of voting and participating in politic actions coted more often
- Bogus person test: you are kind VS intelligent person
Low-ball technique
- Offer a good deal
- Customer decides to buy it (commitment)
- Customer develops new reasons to support their choice
- Original purchase advantage is removed
- Normally, the person would have not purchased the product, but now does
- Also sunk cost: invested time, effort
Add new contribution