Lecture 4 - SI

College 4 (2 video’s)

 

Commitment and consistency

  • Cognitive dissonance
  • Self-perception
  • Social norm
  • Self-persuasion

 

Question

  • Dice game
  • Make a bet: what number?
  • How confident are you about your bet? (5-point-likert scale)

 

Self-persuasion

  • We are more confident about our chances of winning AFTER placing a bet than immediately before laying down a bet
  • Convince our self we have made the right choice and feel better about the choice (self-persuasion)   
  • More satisfied about purchases when you have made your decision
    • Products have more favorable and less unfavorable aspects when choices have been made
  • Minimalize regret
  • With which question can you increase voting by 20% ? Do you expect to vote? (yes = social desirable)

 

Cognitive dissonance

  • Discrepancy between beliefs and behavior causes psychological tension (cognitive dissonance)
  • Motivated to reduce the discrepancy
  • Changing beliefs or behavior
  • After a (behavior) choice has been made: we fool ourselves to keep our belief consistent with what we have already done or decided: rationalize decision

 

Theory of self-concept maintenance

  • A gain at the expense of honest self-concept
  • Try to avoid negative update of self-concept: when starts this?
  • What influences whether we update?

 

Negative update?

  • Categorizing: act as less dishonest

    • E.g. taking €1,- VS a pen
    • Malleability (extent to which you can reinterpret: pen is borrowing, money is stealing)
    • Limit (severity of dishonest behavior: taking someone’s life is bad bc you cant give it back)
  • Attention to (own) moral standards
    • Internal awereness
    • Salience of moral standard, personal norms

 

Attention to moral standards

  • 229 students
  • Solve set of puzzles
  • €10,- per solved puzzle
  • X
  • Manipulation
    • Recall books
    • Recall 10 commandments

 

    • Control (experimenter checks answers)
    • Recycle (take work sheet, report correct answers on paper)

Afbeelding met tafel

Automatisch gegenereerde beschrijving

 

If you set a person in front of the mirror they get more focused on their own personal norms

 

Self awareness

  • Making personal norms more salient
  • Ciadini et al.
  • People are more inline with personal norm in front of a mirror
  • In crime places there are placed a lot of mirrors: not only to see your personal norms, but also the idea that many people are able to see you.

 

 

If you can buy a stolen bike from someone in Groningen you probably would take a crappy student bike, but if the person wants to give you a beautiful mom-bike with 2 kids seats you are getting suspicious and won’t take it.  

 

Justification: an experiment

  • Tedious and meaningless tasks

    • Evaluated very negatively
  • Ask participants to persuade other students to participate as well
    • Compensation €1 or €20
  • Task rated more positively when €1, why? Because they make it nicer in their head; the intrinsic motivation gets greater

 

Self-perception theory

  • Attitudes, emotions, and internal states are inferred from observations of own behavior (no dissonance relieve)
  • I told the task was interesting, so I must have liked the exercise more than I originally thought

 

Advantages Self-perception

  • Convenient, effortless, efficient (like all heuristics)
  • Safe hiding place for troubling realizations
    • Rather not aware of some things
  • Easier to change beliefs than behavior

 

Experiment

  • Children had to eat vegetables they did not like
  • Some were told it was inevitable: they had to eat more in the future
  • These children convinced themselves that it was not that bad
    • Higher acceptance
    • Like the vegetables more

 

Initiation ceremonies

  • Value membership more if you have gone through a great deal of trouble to attain it
  • Cognitive dissonance, self perception --> rationalize
  • Increases commitment
  • Increases group cohesion and chance of group survival
  • Effort is an indicator for us how much we like a person (I do all this for this person, (s)he must me amazing) also with products: the more effort it takes to produce an object, the higher people rate the quality of the object, and the more they like the object (e.g. baking a cake yourself or only adding water): IKEA effect
  • Ikea does the same: you buy the thing and you have to put it together yourself. The effort that is involved in this process makes you like the product more.

 

 

 

 

 

Effort: perception of other

  • Symbolic attributes

    • Your behavior signals who you are
  • The more costly the behavior the stronger the signal (if a bio store is 20km away and you go there you really want to, if you buy bio in the nearest supermarket its less impressive)

 

Cognitive dissonance or self-perception?

  • If people are certain about their behavior and underlying attritudes: cognitive dissonance
  • If people have less experience with the behavior and no firm attitudes have been developed: self-perception

 

Consistency highly valued

  • Inconsistent persons seen as confused, two-faced, mentally ill
  • Consistency associated with personal and intellectual strength
  • Consistency = logical, rational, stable, honest (something from the West: USA. Adapting is more valuable in the East)
  • Once we make a choice or take a stand, we will encounter personal and interpersonal pressures to behave consistently with that commitment (norms)

 

Commitment

  • Written or verbal pledge or promise to engage in specific actions
  • People feel obligated to keep their promise
    • Prevent feeling guilty, feel proud of yourself
    • Bring self-image in line with action
  • Think of new reasons to support decision (remember the dice)

 

Experiment

  • Making reservation in restaurants
  • No show was 30%
  • What question reduced this to 10%? ‘Will you call if you have to cancel the reservation?”

 

  • Experiment at 7:00 am
  • 2 conditions:
    • (1) inform students on time: 24% participants
    • (2) first ask wheter they are willing to participate (56% yes, commitment), then mention time
      • No one changed their mind
      • 95% actually participated

 

  • Setting: beach
  • Confederate
  • Conditions:
    • Control
    • Experimental: “could you please watch my things?”

 

Signing petition

  • Researchers asked ½ of the residents in an apartment complex to sign a petition to create a recreation centre for the handicapted.
  • 2 weeks later, all residents were approached and asked to donate money to the cause.
  • This reflects a two-step process for the ½ of participations who signed the petition.

 

 People want to be in line with their attitude and their behaviors.

 

Experiment: active VS passive commitments

  • Volunteer for AIDS education project

    • 1) active commitment: fill out form stating they wanted to participate
    • 2) passive commitment: not filling out a form stating they didn’t want to participate (stand up if you… all the people who sit will promise something)

 

Our self-image is more in line with the things that we do, than the things that we don’t (I am a student, I work here… NOT: I am not a scholar, I don’t own a bike..)

We need more reasons for an action: sign for being a donor, why do I want to be a doner?

 

Public VS private commitments

  • Public commitments are more effective than personal commitments
  • Example: higher chance of hung juries when opinions are expressed visible show of hands rather than by secret ballot

 

 

 

 

 

Field experiment

  • Energy conservation
  • Conditions:
    • Public commitment
    • Private commitment
    • Control group
  • In case of public commitment lower rate increase in electricity consumption than other groups

 

  • Reduce natural gas consumption
  • Public commitment: names to be published in newspapers as fuel-conversing citizens
  • Saved more energy than control group
  • Names not published after all
    • Even higher savings
    • Rationalize own behavior? No external motivation/minimal justification?

 

Practice

True Love Waits. Safe yourself for after the marriage. This is done publicly (not in your room) at the age of 12/14. The ring is a beautiful reminder of the commitment; and everybody sees the ring so everyone knows you have made the commitment. You get reminded often.

 

Hypocrisy reduction

  • Person makes a public commitment

    • Asked to tell teenagers to practice safe sex
  • Make them mindful of past failures to meet their commitment
    • Fill out questionnaire on past sexual practice
  • More likely to adopt advocated behavior
    • More likely to practice safe sex
    • Adjust behavior to expressed beliefs
  • Cognitive dissonance: changing your behavior is a way out. But what if they change their believe? (I thought I wanted to stay save for my health but now I think about it I have smoked hundred of times so it must be not that important to me)  

 

Written commitment

  • Physical evidence

    • Not able to deny or forget
  • Can easily be made public
    • Persuade public that the author believes what was written
    • Tendency to think written statement reflect true attitudes, even if they know the person did not freely choose to write it down

 

 

 

 

Door-to-door sales companies

  • Ask client to fill out the sale agreement, i.e. a written commitment
  • I like …(brand/companie), because
    • You start to believe more in what you have written

 

Commitment is more effective if

  • Active
  • Public
  • Effortful
  • Irreversible
  • Freely chosen
    • Accept inner responsibility
      • Toy (robot) experiment: make promise to robot (you internalize it)
    • No external attribution
  • Changes in self-image (social desirable things)

 

Foot-in-the-door-technique

  • Start small and build
  • When people comply with a small request, ask them to comply with a more substantial once
  • Initial commitment crucial factor

Why is this effective?

  • Cognitive dissonance: I complied, so probably I agree
  • Change self-image to be consistent with the deed
  • Commitment
  • Desire for consistency
  • Even more extensive compliance may result that is consistent with new self-view

 

Self generated persuasion

  • Design (subtle) situation so that the target group generated arguments in support of your position thereby persuading themselves
  • Example: study by Lewin
    • People who generated their own arguments for serving sweetbreads nearly 11 times more likely to actually serve it than people who attended a lecture

 

Labeling technique (self fulfilling prophecy)

  • We adopt our behavior to the images others have of us
  • Hidden self produce
    • People who were told they were considered charitable people gave more money to charity
    • People who were told they had a higher than average change of voting and participating in politic actions coted more often
    • Bogus person test: you are kind VS intelligent person

 

 

 

 

Low-ball technique

  • Offer a good deal
  • Customer decides to buy it (commitment)
  • Customer develops new reasons to support their choice

 

  • Original purchase advantage is removed
  • Normally, the person would have not purchased the product, but now does
  • Also sunk cost: invested time, effort

Image

Access: 
Public

Image

Join WorldSupporter!
This content is related to:
Lecture notes - Social Influence
Search a summary

Image

 

 

Contributions: posts

Help other WorldSupporters with additions, improvements and tips

Add new contribution

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Image

Spotlight: topics

Image

Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org

Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams

How and why use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?

  • For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
  • For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
  • For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
  • For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
  • For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.

Using and finding summaries, notes and practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter

There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.

  1. Use the summaries home pages for your study or field of study
  2. Use the check and search pages for summaries and study aids by field of study, subject or faculty
  3. Use and follow your (study) organization
    • by using your own student organization as a starting point, and continuing to follow it, easily discover which study materials are relevant to you
    • this option is only available through partner organizations
  4. Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
  5. Use the menu above each page to go to the main theme pages for summaries
    • Theme pages can be found for international studies as well as Dutch studies

Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?

Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance

Main summaries home pages:

Main study fields:

Main study fields NL:

Follow the author: LavaVanDrooge
Work for WorldSupporter

Image

JoHo can really use your help!  Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world

Working for JoHo as a student in Leyden

Parttime werken voor JoHo

Statistics
1081