Research methods in psychology by B. Morling (third edition) – Chapter 4 summary

There are two historical examples of studies that violated several ethical criteria.

  1. Tuskegee Syphilis Study
    This experiment involves black men diagnosed with syphilis, who were lied to, not told that the experiment was about syphilis and intentionally not treated. Participants in this study were not treated respectfully, they were harmed and the researcher targeted a disadvantaged social group in this study.
  2. Milgram Obedience Studies
    This experiment shows that ethical violations are often much more nuanced. Participants in this experiment were debriefed after the experiment. It also shows that balancing the potential risks to participants and the value of the knowledge gained is not an easy decision.

The Belmont Report outlines three main principles for guiding ethical decision making:

  1. Principle of respect for persons
    This includes two provisions. The participants should be treated as autonomous agents. Each person is entitled to the precaution of informed consent. People with less autonomy (e.g: children, mentally disabilities) should be protected. Coercion is an implicit or an explicit suggestion that those who do not participate will suffer a negative consequence.
  2. The principle of beneficence
    Researchers must take precautions to protect the participants of harm and to ensure their well-being. Valuable knowledge must be gained while inflicting as less as possible harm. To prevent harm by collecting personal data, the study can be conducted as an anonymous study. In a confidential study, researchers collect some identifying information, but prevent it from being disclosed.
  3. The principle of justice
    This calls for a fair balance between the kinds of people who participate in a study and the kinds of people who benefit from it.

The APA outlines five general principles for guiding individual aspects of ethical behaviour. Three of the give general principles are the same principles as in the Belmont Report. The other two are:

  1. Fidelity and responsibility
    Establish relationships of trust. Accept the responsibility for professional behaviour (e.g: a psychologist not treating a student or a professor not dating a student).
  2. Integrity
    Strive to be accurate, truthful and honest (e.g: professors are obligated to teach accurately).

The APA lists ten specific ethical standards. These standards are similar to enforceable rules or laws.

  1. Institutional review boards
    An institutional review board is a committee responsible for interpreting ethical principles and ensuring that research using human participants is conducted ethically.

Standard

Definition

Institutional review board

This is a committee responsible for interpreting ethical principles and ensuring that research using human participants is conducted ethically.

Informed consent

This is the researcher’s obligation to explain the study to potential participants in everyday language and give them a chance to decide whether to participate.

Deception

Deception through omission is withholding details of the study from participants. Deception through commission is actively lying to the participants

Debriefing

Participants must be debriefed after the experiment if the experiment uses deception.

Data fabrication and data falsification

Data fabrication occurs when instead of recording what really happened in a study, researchers invent data that fit their hypotheses. Data falsification occurs when researchers influence a study’s results (e.g: selectively removing some results).

Plagiarism

This is representing the ideas or words of others as one’s own. The failure to put the original source in one’s own words is a form of plagiarism as well.

Animal research

There is legal protection for research animals. There must be as few as possible, they must be treated humanely and the researchers must be sure that the research is valuable enough to justify using animal subjects.

When conducting animal research, the three R’s apply:

  1. Replacement
    Researchers should find alternatives to animals in research when possible.
  2. Refinement
    Researchers must modify experimental procedures and other aspects of animal care to minimize or eliminate animal distress.
  3. Reduction
    Researchers should adopt experimental designs and procedures that require the fewest animal subjects possible.

Animal right groups typically use two arguments. Animals experience the same type of suffering humans experience and animals have inherent rights, equal to those of humans. Animal researchers defend their use of animal subjects with three primary arguments: it brings numerous benefits to humans and animals alike, animal researchers are sensitive to animal welfare and researchers have successfully reduced the number of animals they need to use because of new procedures that do not require animal testing.

 

Image

Access: 
Public

Image

Join WorldSupporter!
This content is used in:

Summary of Research methods in psychology by Morling - 3rd edition

Research Methods & Statistics – Interim exam 3 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)

Image

 

 

Contributions: posts

Help other WorldSupporters with additions, improvements and tips

Image

Spotlight: topics

Check the related and most recent topics and summaries:
Activities abroad, study fields and working areas:
Institutions, jobs and organizations:
This content is also used in .....

Image

Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org
Submenu: Summaries & Activities
Follow the author: JesperN
Work for WorldSupporter

Image

JoHo can really use your help!  Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world

Working for JoHo as a student in Leyden

Parttime werken voor JoHo

Statistics
Search a summary, study help or student organization