![Image](https://www.worldsupporter.org/sites/default/files/styles/medium/public/tips_suggestions/wereldbol_summaries_joho_single_boek_1_150x190px.png?itok=rEljlfYL)
High-functioning autism (ASD) can cause difficulties in social interactions, even though tests show that people with ASD do have an understanding of another person’s beliefs and intentions. This leads us to think that there is a deficit in the theory of mind (ToM) of ASD patients. Theory of mind is the ability to infer the contents of other people’s minds, including beliefs and intentions. It suggests that these individuals acquire further compensatory reasoning skills that enable them to succeed on explicit measures of theory of mind.
For testing, the experimenters used a unique way to test ToM reasoning in adults. The test directly measured reasoning about beliefs and intentions with quantitative response scales, instead of verbal justifications. The researchers compared ASD patients with neurotypical adults (these are people who weigh a person’s intention more heavily than the outcome of their action).
What are the results from previous studies?
It is important to note that previous studies make clear that ASD and NT individuals possess the same basic understanding of moral right and wrong. Also, both tested groups had a similar IQ, well above average. Also in earlier studies using neuroimaging evidence the association between moral judgment and ToM is supported (e.g. more activation in the right temporoparietal junction predicts greater consideration of the intentions and therefore less blame for accidents; reduced ToM ability in autism is associated with reduced activation of the rTPJ).
What are the hypotheses of this experiment?
The predictions of the current experiment were that 1) ASD individuals would succeed on a standard test of false beliefs, but 2) that ASD individuals should make atypical moral judgments, especially for accidental harms. It is thought that ASD individuals, due to ToM deficits, would neglect the innocent intentions of a person, and therefore assign more moral blame for accidental harm.
The experiment
To test this, two experiments were executed. In experiment 1, ASD and neurotypical participants performed a theory of mind task to test false belief understanding. Participants had to answer questions about stories that proved either their understanding of a person’s false belief (which requires ToM) or a false physical depiction of the world (which doesn’t require ToM). In experiment 2, the same ASD participants and a new group of neurotypical participants judged the moral permissibility of actions that produced either a negative or neutral outcome, based on the belief that the protagonist was causing a negative or neutral outcome. Both the beliefs and intentions (which require ToM) and processing outcomes (which don’t require ToM) had to be processed.
What are the results of this experiment?
There was no difference between groups on the false belief task, but the researchers found a difference when looking at the moral judgment task of accidental harms (so not for the neutral acts, attempted harms or intentional harms). The ASD group (compared to the neurotypical group) judged accidental and attempted harms as not morally different from one another. These participants did not rely on the information about a person’s innocent intention, and as a direct result paid more attention on the action’s negative outcome. This shows that the beliefs and intentions of a person are not taken into account when ASD patients judge a moral action.
What do these results mean? What can further research focus on?
One explanation for these results is that some aspects of ToM might develop later, or never fully, in ASD individuals. Also it is possible that people with ASD develop compensatory mechanisms, which make them able to solve simple false belief tasks but don’t go further than this. The fact that ASD patients weigh beliefs and intentions of other people less than “normal people” could lead to a difficulty for these individuals in their everyday social interactions. This study focused on moral judgments only, but it is likely that the not taking into account of beliefs and intentions applies to other kinds of social judgment as well. Future research should examine this possibility. The current research results are consistent with earlier observations that ASD patients are impaired at implicit but not explicit ToM.
Study Guide with article summaries for Emotion and Cognition at Leiden University - 2020/2021
Articlesummaries with Emotion and Cognition at Leiden University
Table of content
- Heart Rate Variability as an Index of Regulated Emotional Responding
- Mimicking emotions
- What is an Animal Emotion?
- Perspectives from affective science on understanding the nature of emotion
- Emotional Expressions Beyond Facial Muscle Actions
- Emotion Processing Deficits: A Liability Spectrum - Kret & Ploeger
- Bonobos (Pan Paniscus) show an attentional bias towards conspecificss - Kret, Jaasma, Bionda, & Wijnen
- Bodily Influences on Emotional Feelings
- Emotion’s Response Patterns
- Bodily Maps of Emotions
- Cognitive reappraisal of emotion: a meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies
- Human feelings: why are some more aware than others?
- The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex
- A theory of unconscious thought
- Affect, Mood, and Emotion
- Impaired Theory of Mind for Moral Judgment in High-Functioning Autism
- Psychopathy and instrumental aggression: Evolutionary, neurobiological, and legal perspectives
- The rol of emotion in moral psychology
- Pupil Mimicry Correlates with Trust
- Mood-dependent Memory: Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- The autonomic nervous system and emotion
- Emotions as a mechanism for boundedly rational agents: The fast and frugal way
- Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes
- How do emotion and motivation direct executive control?
- 1 of 2153
- next ›
JoHo can really use your help! Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world
Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams
- Check out: Register with JoHo WorldSupporter: starting page (EN)
- Check out: Aanmelden bij JoHo WorldSupporter - startpagina (NL)
How and why would you use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?
- For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
- For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
- For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
- For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
- For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.
Using and finding summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter
There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.
- Use the menu above every page to go to one of the main starting pages
- Starting pages: for some fields of study and some university curricula editors have created (start) magazines where customised selections of summaries are put together to smoothen navigation. When you have found a magazine of your likings, add that page to your favorites so you can easily go to that starting point directly from your profile during future visits. Below you will find some start magazines per field of study
- Use the topics and taxonomy terms
- The topics and taxonomy of the study and working fields gives you insight in the amount of summaries that are tagged by authors on specific subjects. This type of navigation can help find summaries that you could have missed when just using the search tools. Tags are organised per field of study and per study institution. Note: not all content is tagged thoroughly, so when this approach doesn't give the results you were looking for, please check the search tool as back up
- Check or follow your (study) organizations:
- by checking or using your study organizations you are likely to discover all relevant study materials.
- this option is only available trough partner organizations
- Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
- by following individual users, authors you are likely to discover more relevant study materials.
- Use the Search tools
- 'Quick & Easy'- not very elegant but the fastest way to find a specific summary of a book or study assistance with a specific course or subject.
- The search tool is also available at the bottom of most pages
Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?
- Check out: Why and how to add a WorldSupporter contributions
- JoHo members: JoHo WorldSupporter members can share content directly and have access to all content: Join JoHo and become a JoHo member
- Non-members: When you are not a member you do not have full access, but if you want to share your own content with others you can fill out the contact form
Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance
Field of study
- All studies for summaries, study assistance and working fields
- Communication & Media sciences
- Corporate & Organizational Sciences
- Cultural Studies & Humanities
- Economy & Economical sciences
- Education & Pedagogic Sciences
- Health & Medical Sciences
- IT & Exact sciences
- Law & Justice
- Nature & Environmental Sciences
- Psychology & Behavioral Sciences
- Public Administration & Social Sciences
- Science & Research
- Technical Sciences
Add new contribution