Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>
Introduction
Studies are increasingly identifying the importance of early life experiences to people’s health throughout the life course. Individuals who have adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) tend to have more physical and mental health problems as adults that those who do not have ACEs and ultimately greater premature mortality. ACEs include harms that affect children directly or indirectly through their living environments. Individuals who have ACEs can be more susceptible to disease development through both differences in physiological development and adoption and persistence of health-damaging behaviours.
In this study, the authors present findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies measuring associations between multiple ACEs and health outcomes. The primary outcomes of interest were pooled measures of relations between multiple ACEs and health outcomes. The analyses were restricted to exposure to at least four types of adversity during childhood, with individuals reporting no ACEs as the comparator.
Methods
The search strategy of this review focused on six categories of health outcomes: substance use, sexual health, mental health, weight and physical exercise, violence, and physical health status and conditions. Studies were excluded based on high-risk or clinical populations because of often few individuals with low ACE exposure in such populations. Included studies met the following criteria: cross-sectional, case control, or cohort study, using a cumulative measure of at least four ACEs spanning both direct and indirect types, focused predominantly of adults aged at least 18 years, a sample size of at least 100, and reported odds ratios (ORs, comparable statistics, or data to enable their calculation for a health outcome. Included articles were independently assessed for quality by two reviewers using criteria based on the standard principles of quality assessment. Studies received a point for each quality criterion that they met, for a maximum score of 7.
Results
Of 11621 references identified by the search, 37 included studies provided risk estimates for 23 outcomes, with a total of 253719 participants. Individuals with at least four ACEs were at increased risk of all health outcomes compared with individuals with no ACEs. Associations were:
- Weak or modest for physical inactivity, overweight or obesity, and diabetes (ORS of less than two)
- Moderate for smoking, heavy alcohol use, poor self-rated health, cancer, heart disease, and respiratory disease (ORs of two or three)
- Strong for sexual risk taking, mental ill health, and problematic alcohol use (ORs of more than three to six)
- Strongest for problematic drug use and interpersonal and self-directed violence (ORs of more than seven)
Discussion & Conclusion
This study is the first to synthesize evidence for the effect of multiple ACEs and measure the relative magnitude of associations with many of the lifestyle behaviours and health conditions that challenge public health globally. For all outcomes examined, pooled ORs indicated increased risk among individuals with at least four ACEs compared with those reporting none. The results suggest that to have multiple ACEs is a major risk factor for many health conditions. The outcomes most strongly associated with multiple ACEs represent ACE risks for the next generation. To sustain improvements in public health requires a shift in focus to include prevention of ACEs, resilience building, and ACE-informed service provision. The
Sustained prevention gains might require a shift in focus to include the early drivers of poor health. Policies that capture the environmental and societal causes of adversity in childhood offer new opportunities to address ACEs rather than just their consequences. Specifically, through the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, countries have committed to action to meet 17 global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030. Though several SDGs address violence directly, many others support focus on broad ACEs and their risk factors (e.g., goal 3 (good health and wellbeing), goal 4 (quality education), and goal 10 (reduced inequalities)). The SDGs also place major focus on early childhood development as a means of securing lifelong health and provide strong political endorsement and a multisectoral framework for this approach.
Along with the outcomes covered in this analysis, studies are now identifying associations between multiple ACEs and broad harms to life prospects, including education, employment, and poverty. Strengthening understanding of the combined effect of ACEs across multiagency priorities should catalyze multidisciplinary prevention focused on early intervention. Collaborative, trauma-informed services can address the various adversities affecting individuals and families across the life course, providing integrated services to support individuals and reduce the likelihood that their own children in turn will be affected by ACEs.
This systematic review and meta-analysis identify the pervasive effects that childhood adversity can have on health across the life course, with exposure to multiple ACEs affecting all the health outcomes examined, including some of the leading causes of the global burden of disease. Outcomes showing the strongest relations with multiple ACEs (violence, mental illness, and problematic substance abuse) can represent ACEs for the next generation (exposure to parental domestic violence, mental illness, and substance use) and thus are indicative of the intergenerational effects that can lock families into cycles of adversity, deprivation, and ill health. Although research into ACEs is far from complete, a compelling case exists for increased international focus on prevention of ACEs, and implementation of policies that support a sustainable life-course approach to health.
Contributions: posts
Spotlight: topics
Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams
- Check out: Register with JoHo WorldSupporter: starting page (EN)
- Check out: Aanmelden bij JoHo WorldSupporter - startpagina (NL)
How and why use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?
- For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
- For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
- For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
- For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
- For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.
Using and finding summaries, notes and practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter
There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.
- Use the summaries home pages for your study or field of study
- Use the check and search pages for summaries and study aids by field of study, subject or faculty
- Use and follow your (study) organization
- by using your own student organization as a starting point, and continuing to follow it, easily discover which study materials are relevant to you
- this option is only available through partner organizations
- Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
- Use the menu above each page to go to the main theme pages for summaries
- Theme pages can be found for international studies as well as Dutch studies
Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?
- Check out: Why and how to add a WorldSupporter contributions
- JoHo members: JoHo WorldSupporter members can share content directly and have access to all content: Join JoHo and become a JoHo member
- Non-members: When you are not a member you do not have full access, but if you want to share your own content with others you can fill out the contact form
Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance
Main summaries home pages:
- Business organization and economics - Communication and marketing -International relations and international organizations - IT, logistics and technology - Law and administration - Leisure, sports and tourism - Medicine and healthcare - Pedagogy and educational science - Psychology and behavioral sciences - Society, culture and arts - Statistics and research
- Summaries: the best textbooks summarized per field of study
- Summaries: the best scientific articles summarized per field of study
- Summaries: the best definitions, descriptions and lists of terms per field of study
- Exams: home page for exams, exam tips and study tips
Main study fields:
Business organization and economics, Communication & Marketing, Education & Pedagogic Sciences, International Relations and Politics, IT and Technology, Law & Administration, Medicine & Health Care, Nature & Environmental Sciences, Psychology and behavioral sciences, Science and academic Research, Society & Culture, Tourisme & Sports
Main study fields NL:
- Studies: Bedrijfskunde en economie, communicatie en marketing, geneeskunde en gezondheidszorg, internationale studies en betrekkingen, IT, Logistiek en technologie, maatschappij, cultuur en sociale studies, pedagogiek en onderwijskunde, rechten en bestuurskunde, statistiek, onderzoeksmethoden en SPSS
- Studie instellingen: Maatschappij: ISW in Utrecht - Pedagogiek: Groningen, Leiden , Utrecht - Psychologie: Amsterdam, Leiden, Nijmegen, Twente, Utrecht - Recht: Arresten en jurisprudentie, Groningen, Leiden
JoHo can really use your help! Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world
1301 |
Add new contribution