IBP Social Psychology Summary - Dealing with Adversity and Achieving a Happy Life -ch 12

Social and Organizational Psychology

IBP 2017-2018

 

 

Dealing with Adversity and Achieving a Happy Life

 

Stress: a contributing factor to psychological and physical health problems

  • Can stem from traumatic events, or frequent daily hassles
  • Interferes with the operation of the body’s immune system, and can be measured at the cellular level
  • Stress can be reduced by social support

Loneliness: when a person has fewer and less satisfying relationships than desired

  • If you see your personality as “fixed”: you are likely to react to rejection by cutting yourself off from others
  • If you perceive yourself as capable of change: experience rejection as an opportunity for future improvement or growth
  • Interventions related to self-change help to improve people’s resilience in the face of stress and reduce the likelihood of depression

Discrimination

  • Experiencing discrimination based on disability, sexual minorities, and weight, is associated with harm to well-being
  • Weight discrimination predicts mortality

Improving mental health

  • Regular exercise
  • Social support has shown to be beneficial for people with PTSD
  • Joining groups can foster social connectedness and help prevent depression
  • Practicing self-forgiveness

Is the legal system fair?

  • Understand potential sources of error and bias within the current system
  • Lineups used to identify criminal suspects are subject to bias if all the suspects are shown at once (simultaneous lineup)
  • In legal proceedings, defendants’ race, gender, physical attractiveness, and socioeconomic status can influence jurors’ perceptions and judgments

Happiness: often referred to as subjective well-being with four basic components:

  • global life satisfaction
  • satisfaction with specific life domains
  • a high level of positive feelings
  • a minimum of negative feelings

 

Several factors consistently account for a nations’ average happiness levels:

  • degree of social support
  • per capita income
  • healthy life expectancy
  • freedom to make life choices
  • generosity toward others
  • amount of violence
  • degree of corruption

On being happy:

  • Happy people are more community-oriented than unhappy people
  • Monetary wealth beyond a certain point does not necessarily increase happiness
  • The optimum level of well-being theory: very high levels of happiness can foster complacency or lead to unjustified overoptimism
  • Growing evidence supports the idea that happiness levels are fundamentally changeable
  • Many of the characteristics needed to be a successful entrepreneur are the same ones that contribute to happiness levels
    • Self-determination theory: entrepreneurs typically have strong intrinsic motivation

 

 

References:

Baron, R., & Branscombe, N. (2016). Social psychology (14th edition) Harlow: Pearson Education Limited

--Chapter 12

Access: 
Public

Image

This content is also used in .....

Social and Organizational psychology bundle

IBP Social Psychology Summary - Introduction & Social cognition- ch 1 and 2

IBP Social Psychology Summary - Introduction & Social cognition- ch 1 and 2

Image

Social and Organizational Psychology

IBP 2017-2018

 

Introduction:

Social psychology: the scientific field that seeks to understand the nature and causes of individual behavior, feelings, and thoughts in social situations

Four of the most important values that all fields must adopt to be considered scientific in nature:

  • Accuracy: Gathering and evaluating information about the world in as careful, precise, and error-free manner as possible
  • Objectivity: Obtaining and evaluating information in a manner that is as free from bias as possible
  • Skepticism: Accepting findings as accurate only to the extent they have been verified over and over again
  • Open-Mindedness: A commitment to changing one’s views if existing evidence suggests that these views are inaccurate

Why do social psychologists adopt the scientific method?

Because “common sense” provides an unreliable guide to social behavior and because our personal thought is influenced by many potential sources of bias.

 

Social Cognition:

Social Cognition: how we think about other people and the social world

Given our limited cognitive capacity, we often experience information overload. To cope with this condition, we use heuristics (simple rules of thumb for making decisions in a quick and relatively effortless manner)

Heuristics:

  • Representativeness: the more an individual seems to resemble, or match a given group, the more likely she or he is to belong to that group
  • Availability:  the easier it is to bring information to mind, the greater its impact on subsequent decisions or judgments
  • Anchoring and adjustment: using a number or value as a starting point from which we then make adjustments.
    • Example: portion size effect: the tendency to eat more when a larger portion of food is received than a smaller portion
  • Status Quo: the way things are currently is better than any other alternative

Schemas: basic components of social cognition. These mental frameworks, formed through experience, help us to organize social information. Once formed, schemas exert powerful effects on what we notice (attention), enter into memory (encoding), and later remember (retrieval).

  • Priming: temporary increases in the accessibility of specific schemas
    • Example: the word nurse is recognized more quickly following the word doctor than following the word bread
  • Perseverance effect: tendency to cling to one’s initial belief even after receiving new information that contradicts or disconfirms the basis of that belief
  • Unpriming: When the schema is expressed in behavior or thoughts
  • Schemas can also exert self-fulfilling effects, causing us to behave in ways that confirm them
  • Metaphors:  relate an abstract concept to another dissimilar one

 

Controlled vs Automatic processing

Controlled processing: occurs in a systematic, logical, and highly effortful manner

.....read more
Access: 
Public
IBP Social Psychology Summary - Social perception- ch 3

IBP Social Psychology Summary - Social perception- ch 3

Image

Social and Organizational Psychology

IBP 2017-2018

Social perception

Social perception: the process through which we seek to know other people

Nonverbal communication: an unspoken language of facial expressions, eye contact, body movements, and touching

  • Body language reflects emotions through the positions, postures, and movements of the body
  • People can express emotions through vocal effects, such as tone, volume, pitch, and rhythm
  • The facial feedback hypothesis: our nonverbal cues may influence our internal feelings.
  • Nonverbal cues for deception:
    • Microexpressions: facial expressions lasting only a few tenths of a second
    • Interchannel discrepancies: nonverbal cues and body language that are inconsistent with each other
    • Exaggerated facial expressions
  • Signs of deception in linguistic styles:
    • pitch of the voice often rises
    • taking longer to respond to a question or being slower in describing events
    • start sentences, stop them, and begin again
  • Detecting deception accurately is very difficult, but e.g. secret agents are slightly better at it

Attribution: efforts to understand why people have acted as they have

Jones and Davis’s theory of correspondent inference: we attempt to infer others’ traits from observing certain aspects of their behavior

  • especially behavior that is:
    • freely chosen
    • produces noncommon effects
    • is low in social desirability

Kelley’s covariation theory: we are interested in whether others’ behavior stems from internal or external causes

  • We focus on information relating to:
    • consensus: the extent to which other people react to a given stimulus or event in the same manner as the person we are evaluating
    • consistency: the extent to which the person in question reacts to the stimulus or event in the same way on other occasions, over time
    • distinctiveness: the extent to which the person reacts in the same manner to other, different stimuli or events

Other dimensions of causal attribution:

  • Specific causes of behavior being stable or unstable over time
  • Behavioral causes are controllable or not controllable

Action identification: The interpretation we place on an act in terms of differing degrees of abstraction

  • Example: Seeing someone put coins in a jar
    • Concrete interpretation: she wants to avoid losing the coins
    • Abstract interpretation: she wants to save money for her education

Correspondence bias: the tendency to explain others’ actions as stemming from their dispositions (internal), even in the presence of clear situational causes (external)

Actor–observer effect: the tendency to attribute our own behavior to external causes but that of others to internal

.....read more
Access: 
Public
IBP Social Psychology Summary - The self- ch 4

IBP Social Psychology Summary - The self- ch 4

Image

Social and Organizational Psychology

IBP 2017-2018

 

The self

Often, others are better at predicting our behavior than us, because we know all our intentions and motives, they only see the outcome

How we present ourselves:

  • Self-promotion: present our most favorable self-aspects
  • Self-verification: having others agree with us about ourselves, even the negative qualities
  • Ingratiation tactics: conveying our respect for others
  • Self-depreciation: imply that we are not as good as the other person

Self-knowledge

  • Introspection: the examination of one's own mental and emotional processes
    • Tricky because we often don’t have conscious access to the emotional factors that affect our behavioral choices, or to what actually brings us happiness
    • We may have difficulty predicting how we will feel in the future
  • Think of ourselves by taking an observer’s perspective
    • We see the self in more trait terms and less responsive to situations, as observers do

Personal-versus-social identity continuum

  • Personal identity level: based on intragroup comparison, we think of ourselves in terms of attributes that differentiate ourselves from other individuals
  • Social identity level: based on intergroup comparison, perceptions of ourselves are based on attributes that are shared with other group members

Self-definitions

  • What aspect of the self is influential at any moment in time depends on:
    • Context
    •  distinctiveness of the attribute
    • importance of the identity
    •  how others refer to us
  • If we expect others to reject us for an aspect of ourselves:
    • We try to alter the part of the self that brings rejection, or
    • We rebel against those rejecting us by making that feature even more self-defining

Future possible selves

  • Can motivate us to attempt self-change
  • Role models: can represent future possible selves that we can attain
  • Autobiographical memory: when people compare their present self to their past self, the further in the past that self is the more we downgrade it relative to our present self
  • Dreaded possible selves can lead us to give up certain behaviors
  • Desired possible selves can lead us to work hard to attain a behavior

Self-control

  • Ego depletion: the process in which self-control is temporarily used up, which makes it more difficult to self-regulate
  • Self-control can be more difficult when:
    • the initial control effort was longer
    • when no rest period is given
    •  when people lack training in self-regulation

Self-esteem

  • Self-esteem changes in response to life events
  • Implicit self-esteem measures: assess self-feelings of which we are not consciously aware
  • Explicit self-esteem measures: assess self-feelings of which we are aware
  • Initially, students who migrate show lower self-esteem, but that improves over time
  • Women on average have lower self-esteem than men

Social comparison

    .....read more
    Access: 
    Public
    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Attitudes- ch 5

    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Attitudes- ch 5

    Image

    Social and Organizational Psychology

    IBP 2017-2018

     

    Attitudes: evaluations that can color our experience of virtually any aspect of the world

     

    Explicit: Consciously accessible and easy to report

    Implicit: Not consciously accessible or controllable

    Social learning: many of our views are acquired by interacting with others, or simply observing their behavior

    • Classical conditioning: Learning based on association
      • subliminal conditioning: occurs in the absence of conscious awareness of the stimuli involved (e.g. photos shown for a very brief period of time)
      • mere exposure
    • Instrumental conditioning: Rewards for doing a certain behavior
    • Observational learning: When individuals acquire attitudes or behaviors by observing others

    Social networks: sets of individuals with whom we interact on a regular basis

    Social comparison: our tendency to compare ourselves with others to determine whether our view of social reality is or is not correct

    Link between attitudes and behavior:

    • Situational constraints: may prevent us from expressing our attitudes overtly
    • Pluralistic ignorance: believing that others have different attitudes than we do, which can limit our willingness to express our attitudes in public
    • These factors can make our attitudes more likely to guide our behavior:
      • extremity of our attitude position
      • the certainty with which our attitudes are held
      • whether we have personal experience with the attitude object
    • Theory of planned behavior: the decision to engage in a particular behavior is the result of a rational process
    • Attitude-to-behavior process model: in situations where our behavior is more spontaneous, and we do not engage in deliberate thought, attitudes influence behavior by shaping our perception and interpretation of the situation

    Persuasion: efforts to change attitudes through the use of message

    • We process persuasive messages in two different ways:
      • systematic processing: involves careful attention to message content
      • heuristic processing:  involves the use of mental shortcuts (e.g., “experts are usually right”)
    • Resistance to persuasion:
      • reactance: negative reactions to efforts by others to reduce our personal freedom
      • forewarning: the knowledge that someone is trying to change our attitudes
      • When ego-depleted, people experience greater difficulty self-regulating, which undermines resistance to persuasion

    Maintaining current attitudes

    • Selective avoidance: the tendency to overlook or disregard information that contradicts our existing views
    • Selective exposure: actively seeking out information that is consistent with our existing attitudes

    Cognitive dissonance:  an unpleasant state that occurs when we notice discrepancies between our attitudes and our behavior

    • Less-leads-to-more effect: less reasons
    .....read more
    Access: 
    Public
    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Causes and Cures of Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination -ch 6

    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Causes and Cures of Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination -ch 6

    Image

    Social and Organizational Psychology

    IBP 2017-2018

     

    Causes and Cures of Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination

     

    Discriminatory treatment can be:

    • Short-term: minimal criteria such as being assigned to a group in class
    • Long-term: ethnicity, gender, religion, and sexual orientation.
    • Seen as legitimate: e.g. discrimination against single people (singlism)
    • Seen as illegitimate: e.g.: sexual orientation

    People are risk averse with potential losses having greater psychological impact than potential gains

    • People who are more privileged in some way might be more against equality, as they perceive it as a potential loss (e.g. whites against blacks)

    Gender stereotypes: beliefs about the different attributes that males and females possess

    • The glass ceiling effect: when qualified women have disproportionate difficulty attaining high-level position
    • The glass cliff effect: women are more likely to be appointed to leadership positions following a crisis and when there is greater risk of failure
    • Negative stereotypes towards men too: such as being low on warmth

    Tokenism: acceptance of only a few members of a particular group

    • It maintains perceptions that the system is not discriminatory (belief in meritocracy)
    • People who are hired as token representatives of their groups are perceived negatively by other members of the organization
    • The person being in a leadership position might be undermined as simply being there to “fill the quota”

    Scales

    • Objective scales: the meaning is the same no matter who they are applied to
    • Subjective scales: standards that can take on different meanings, depending on who they are applied to
      • Shifting standards: the idea that descriptions are made with reference to some standard of judgment, and that this standard may shift depending on the person or object being described (e.g. being tall means something different for children and adults)

    Stereotypes are resistant to change, but they are revised as the relations between the groups are altered

    • Example: Women who are repeatedly exposed to women faculty behaving in nontraditional roles show less agreement with gender stereotypes

    Prejudice: an attitude (usually negative) toward members of a social group

    • Prejudice may reflect more specific underlying emotional responses to different outgroups including fear, anger, guilt, pity, envy, and disgust
    • Can be automatic and implicit in nature

    Social identity theory: prejudice is derived from our tendency to divide the world into “us” and “them” and to view our own group more favorably than various outgroups

    • Threat to our group’s interests can motivate prejudice
    • Terror management theory: prejudice towards atheists for example, reflects our own existential anxiety

    Modern racism: more subtle form of discrimination

    Bona fide

    .....read more
    Access: 
    Public
    IBP Social Psychology Summary -Liking, loving, and other close relationships -ch 7

    IBP Social Psychology Summary -Liking, loving, and other close relationships -ch 7

    Image

    Social and Organizational Psychology

    IBP 2017-2018

     

    Liking, loving, and other close relationships

     

    Interpersonal attraction: refers to the evaluations we make of other people, our attitudes towards them

    • Direct effects on attraction: occur when another person is responsible for arousing positive emotions or feelings
    • Indirect effects: occur when the emotion comes from another source, and another person is simply associated with its presence
      • applied by advertisers and political tacticians who understand that associating products and candidates with positive feelings can influence our purchasing and voting decisions

    Proximity: nearness to each other

    • Repeated exposure effect: the more often we are exposed to a new stimulus (e.g.: a new person) the more favorable our evaluation of it tends to become

    Physical attractiveness

    • Attraction toward others is often strongly influenced by their observable characteristic
    • “Love is blind”: Partners in romantic relationships tend to perceive each other as more attractive than people outside the relationships
    • Other observable characteristics that influence interpersonal evaluations include physique, weight, and even the color red

    Similarity

    • The similarity–dissimilarity effect:  people respond positively to those who are similar to them and negatively to those who are dissimilar
    • The larger the proportion of similarity, the greater the attraction
    • Matching hypothesis: we tend to choose romantic partners who are similar to ourselves in terms of physical attractiveness
    • Balance theory: when two people like each other and discover they are similar in some specific respect, this constitutes a state of balance, which is emotionally pleasant
    • Social comparison theory: you compare your attitudes and beliefs with those of others because the only way you can evaluate the accuracy of your views

    Love

    • Combination of emotions, cognitions, and behaviors
    • Triangular model of love: passion, intimacy, and decision/commitment
      • consummate love: if these components are equally strong and balanced
      • companionate love: is based shared interests, respect, and concern for one another’s welfare
    • Two factors that can destroy romantic love are jealousy and infidelity

    The attachment styles in childhood (secure, fearful-avoidant, preoccupied, and dismissing) influence the nature of other relationships

    Affiliation: the motivation to interact with other people in a cooperative way

     

     

     

    References:

    Baron, R., & Branscombe, N. (2016). Social psychology (14th edition) Harlow: Pearson Education Limited

    --Chapter 7

    Access: 
    Public
    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Social influence - ch 8

    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Social influence - ch 8

    Image

    Social and Organizational Psychology

    IBP 2017-2018

     

    Social influence

    Social influence: efforts by one or more people to change the behavior, attitudes, or feelings of one or more others

    Forms of influence:

    • Conformity 
    • Compliance
    • Obedience
    • Unintentional social influence

    Conformity: efforts to change others’ behavior through norms about how to behave in a given situation

    • First systematically studied by Solomon Asch
    • Formal: as in speed limits, rules for playing games
    • Informal: as in the general rule “ don’t stare at people on an elevator”
    • Cohesiveness: degree of attraction felt by an individual toward some group, group size, and type of social norm operating in that situation
      •  Descriptive norms: describe what most people do in a given situation
      •  Injunctive norms: specify how people should behave in a given situation
    • Motives to conform:
      • The desire to be liked by others (normative social influence)
      •  the desire to be right or accurate (informational social influence)
    • Motives to not conform:
      • Being perceived as being higher in status than those who conform
      • Conformity can induce good people to perform bad actions (e.g.: Stanford prison experiment)

     

    Compliance: efforts to change others’ behavior through direct requests

    • Foot-in-the-door technique: presenting target people with a small request and then following up with a larger request
    •  Lowball procedure: After the customer accepts the good offer, something happens that makes it necessary for the salesperson to change the deal and make it less advantageous for the customer
    • Door-in-the-face: starting with a very large request and then, after this is rejected, shift to a smaller request
    • Playing hard to get and the deadline technique: based on the principle of scarcity, where what is scarce or hard to obtain is seen as valuable

     

    Obedience: following direct orders or commands from others

    • Many people obey orders from authorities, even if these orders require them to do harm (Milgram’s experiment)
    • How it works:
      • People are more willing to obey when the authority is responsible for their actions
      • They see signs of authority which remind them of the norm “obey those in authority”
      • There is a gradual escalation of the scope of the commands given
      • The rapid pace with which such situations proceed gives no time to reflect

     

    Unintentional social influence: influence that occurs when other people change our behavior without intending to do so

    • Emotional contagion: instances in which our own emotions are influenced by those of others even when they do not intend to produce such effects
    • Symbolic social influence: occurs when our thoughts about others influence our actions or thoughts even if they are not present
    • Modeling: we learn from
    .....read more
    Access: 
    Public
    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Prosocial behavior- ch 9

    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Prosocial behavior- ch 9

    Image

    Social and Organizational Psychology

    IBP 2017-2018

     

    Prosocial behavior: Helping others

    Empathy: the capacity to be able to experience others’ emotional states, feel sympathetic toward them, and take their perspective

    • Emotional empathy: involves sharing the feelings and emotions of others
    • Empathic accuracy: perceiving others’ thoughts and feelings accurately
    • Empathic concern: involves feelings of concern for another’s well-being

    Motives for prosocial behavior:

    • Empathy-altruism hypothesis: we help those in need because we experience empathic concern for them
    • Negative-state relief model: people help other people in order to relieve and make less negative their own emotional discomfort
    • Empathic joy hypothesis:  helping stems from the positive reactions recipients show when they receive help (e.g., gifts) and the positive feelings this, in turn, induces in helpers.
    • Competitive altruism theory:  we help others as a means of increasing our own status and reputation
    • Kin selection theory: we help others who are related to us because this increases the likelihood that our genes will be transmitted to future generations
    • Defensive helping: reducing the threat posed by outgroups to our own ingroup

     

    Helping between strangers

    • Diffusion of responsibility: the more bystanders present as witnesses to an emergency, the less likely each of them is to provide help and the greater the delay before help occurs
    • Pluralistic ignorance: the tendency for an individual surrounded by a group of strangers to refrain from acting
      • Because the bystanders depends on the others to provide cues for appropriate action, no one does anything.

    When are we likely to help?

    • When the other is similar to us
    • Being exposed to a prosocial model
    • Playing prosocial videogames

    When are we not likely to help?

    • Social exclusion: being excluded from others makes us less likely to be empathetic
    • Darkness: feeling of anonymity
    •  Putting an economic value on our time: time used in helping others can’t be used for other activities, including ones that generate income

    An important factor determining how recipients react to help is the motivation underlying such behavior:

    • If it seems to stem from internal motives (e.g., a genuine desire to help), positive feelings and reactions may result
    • If it stems from external motives (i.e., the helper felt obligated to extend assistance), reactions tend to be far less favorable

    Crowdfunding: allows individuals to make financial contributions to entrepreneurs, to help them start new companies

    Men and women

    • Do not differ in prosocial behavior overall
    • Women are more likely to engage in prosocial actions when these involve people with whom
    .....read more
    Access: 
    Public
    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Aggression - ch 10

    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Aggression - ch 10

    Image

    Social and Organizational Psychology

    IBP 2017-2018

     

    Aggression

    Aggression is the intentional infliction of harm on others

    • Theories:

      • Drive theories of aggression: aggression stems from externally elicited drives to harm or injure others
      • The frustration-aggression hypothesis: the suggestion that frustration is a very powerful determinant of aggression
      •  The general aggression model recognizes the importance of learning, various eliciting input variables, individual differences, affective states, and cognitive processes in aggression
    • Frustration is a strong elicitor of aggression only under certain limited conditions. In contrast, provocation from others is a powerful elicitor of aggression

    • Exposure to media violence and playing violent video games increases aggression

    • Men appear to be more likely than women to engage in physical aggression, but the two genders do not differ significantly in terms of verbal aggression

    • When does aggression increase?

      • High temperatures (unless it is too uncomfortable)
      • When consuming alcohol
      • There is an availability of weapons
    • Bullying: repeated aggression against individuals who are unable to defend themselves against such treatment

      • Bullies and bully-victims appear to have lower self-esteem than children who are not involved in bullying
      •  In recent years, cyberbullying—bullying that occurs through electronic means has increased
      • Can be reduced by increased supervision by teachers, getting parents involved, and having popular peers serve as antibullying advocates
    • Ways to reduce aggression:

      • Inducing thoughts and feelings that are incompatible with anger or aggression
      • Using cognitive techniques for changing the focus of your thought (e.g.: count to ten)
      • Punishment is rarely effective in reducing aggression

     

     

     

     

    References:

    Baron, R., & Branscombe, N. (2016). Social psychology (14th edition) Harlow: Pearson Education Limited

    --Chapter 9

     

    Access: 
    Public
    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Groups and Individuals- ch 11

    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Groups and Individuals- ch 11

    Image

    Social and Organizational Psychology

    IBP 2017-2018

     

    Groups and Individuals – The consequences of belonging

     

    Groups: collections of people who perceive themselves as forming a cohesive unit to some degree

    • Common-bond groups: the members tend to be bonded with each other
    • Common-identity groups: members tend to be linked via the category as a whole 
    • Entitativity: the extent to which the group is perceived to form a coherent entity

    Basic aspects of groups involve:

    • Status: position or rank within a group
    • Roles: To the extent that people internalize their social roles, where those roles are linked to aspects of their self-concept, they can have important implications for behavior and well-being (e.g.: being assigned to act as “prisoner” or “guard” in a prison simulation)
    •  Norms: Implicit rules about what is appropriate
      • Norms of individualism and collectivism can affect our willingness to tolerate dissent within groups
      • Cohesiveness: factors that cause people to want to remain members

    The benefits of being part of a group

    • Increased self-knowledge
    • Progress toward important goals
    • Higher status
    • Enhanced sense of control
    • Possibility of attaining social change - especially if a politicized collective identity develops
    • BUT: loss of personal freedom and often heavy demands

    When do individuals withdraw from a group?

    • Group has changed so much that it no longer reflects their basic values or beliefs
    • Schism: division of people based on ideology

    Intergroup sensitivity effect: Ingroup critics are tolerated more than outgroup critics because they are seen as having the ingroup’s interests at heart

    Audience and performance:

    • Social facilitation: he mere presence of other people can influence our performance on many tasks
    • Drive theory of social facilitation: the presence of others is arousing and can either increase or reduce performance, depending on whether dominant responses in a given situation are correct or incorrect
    • The distraction conflict theory: social facilitation stems from the conflict produced when individuals attempt, simultaneously, to pay attention to the other people present and to the task being performed
    • Evaluation apprehension view: an audience disrupts our performance because we are concerned about their evaluation of us

    Social loafing: reduced output by each group member especially on additive tasks where member contributions are combined

    • Can be reduced by:
      • making outputs individually identifiable
      • increasing commitment to the task and task importance
      • ensuring that each member’s contributions to the task are unique

    Influence of crowds

    • Anonymity in a crowd induces more normative or conforming behavior
    • Deindividuation can intensify
    .....read more
    Access: 
    Public
    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Dealing with Adversity and Achieving a Happy Life -ch 12

    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Dealing with Adversity and Achieving a Happy Life -ch 12

    Image

    Social and Organizational Psychology

    IBP 2017-2018

     

     

    Dealing with Adversity and Achieving a Happy Life

     

    Stress: a contributing factor to psychological and physical health problems

    • Can stem from traumatic events, or frequent daily hassles
    • Interferes with the operation of the body’s immune system, and can be measured at the cellular level
    • Stress can be reduced by social support

    Loneliness: when a person has fewer and less satisfying relationships than desired

    • If you see your personality as “fixed”: you are likely to react to rejection by cutting yourself off from others
    • If you perceive yourself as capable of change: experience rejection as an opportunity for future improvement or growth
    • Interventions related to self-change help to improve people’s resilience in the face of stress and reduce the likelihood of depression

    Discrimination

    • Experiencing discrimination based on disability, sexual minorities, and weight, is associated with harm to well-being
    • Weight discrimination predicts mortality

    Improving mental health

    • Regular exercise
    • Social support has shown to be beneficial for people with PTSD
    • Joining groups can foster social connectedness and help prevent depression
    • Practicing self-forgiveness

    Is the legal system fair?

    • Understand potential sources of error and bias within the current system
    • Lineups used to identify criminal suspects are subject to bias if all the suspects are shown at once (simultaneous lineup)
    • In legal proceedings, defendants’ race, gender, physical attractiveness, and socioeconomic status can influence jurors’ perceptions and judgments

    Happiness: often referred to as subjective well-being with four basic components:

    • global life satisfaction
    • satisfaction with specific life domains
    • a high level of positive feelings
    • a minimum of negative feelings

     

    Several factors consistently account for a nations’ average happiness levels:

    • degree of social support
    • per capita income
    • healthy life expectancy
    • freedom to make life choices
    • generosity toward others
    • amount of violence
    • degree of corruption

    On being happy:

    • Happy people are more community-oriented than unhappy people
    • Monetary wealth beyond a certain point does not necessarily increase happiness
    • The optimum level of well-being theory: very high levels of happiness can foster complacency or lead to unjustified overoptimism
    • Growing evidence supports the idea that happiness levels are fundamentally changeable
    • Many of the characteristics needed to be a successful entrepreneur are the same ones that contribute to happiness levels
      • Self-determination theory: entrepreneurs typically have strong intrinsic motivation

     

     

    References:

    Baron, R., & Branscombe, N. (2016). Social psychology (14th edition)

    .....read more
    Access: 
    Public

    The Happiness Bundle: content and contributions about the science of happiness

    Article summary of Very happy people by Diener & Seligman. (1)

    Article summary of Very happy people by Diener & Seligman. (1)

    What is this article about?

    This is a research report of an experiment where 222 undergraduates were screened for high happiness. The upper 10% of consistently very happy people were compared with average people and very unhappy people. This study has tried to find out what some factor might be that influence high happiness: social relationships, personality and psychopathology, and variables that have been related to subjective well-being in correlational studies. It also examined whether there was a variable that was sufficient for happiness and a variable that was necessary for happiness (sufficient: everyone with the variable is happy, necessary: every happy person has the variable).

    What were the results?

    On a scale from 5 to 35, the very happy group scored about 30 on life satisfaction. The very happy people had virtually never thought about suicide, could recall many more good events in their lives than bad ones, and had many more positive than negative emotions on a daily basis. The very unhappy people were dissatisfied with life and had equal amounts of positive and negative affect on a daily basis. They reported this about themselves, but their friends and family also rated them dissatisfied. The average group was in the middle of these two groups. 

    The biggest difference between the very happy group and the average and very unhappy group, was in their fulsome and satisfying interpersonal lives. The very happy people spent the least time alone and the most time socializing and valued their relationships the highest. Good social relationships might be a necessary condition for high happiness.

    The very happy people also scored the lowest on psychopathology tests, virtually never in the clinical range. Almost half of the very unhappy group scored in the clinical range. 

    Also good to note, was that the verry happy people never reported their mood to be "ecstatic", but they did score their mood with a 7, 8 or 9 most of the time.

    Broader samples and longitudinal methods are needed to make strong conclusions from these results. These findings do suggest that very happy people have rich and satisfying social relationships and spend little time alone. But it is not yet clear what the causal relationship is here: perhaps happy people have better relationships because of their happiness, or happiness and good relationships are both caused by a third variable. What is clear is that social relationships might be a necessary but are not a sufficient condition for high happiness. Very happy people also experience unpleasant emotions and rarely feel euphoria or ecstacy. They are rather medium to moderatly happy most of the time.

    Access: 
    Public
    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Dealing with Adversity and Achieving a Happy Life -ch 12

    IBP Social Psychology Summary - Dealing with Adversity and Achieving a Happy Life -ch 12

    Image

    Social and Organizational Psychology

    IBP 2017-2018

     

     

    Dealing with Adversity and Achieving a Happy Life

     

    Stress: a contributing factor to psychological and physical health problems

    • Can stem from traumatic events, or frequent daily hassles
    • Interferes with the operation of the body’s immune system, and can be measured at the cellular level
    • Stress can be reduced by social support

    Loneliness: when a person has fewer and less satisfying relationships than desired

    • If you see your personality as “fixed”: you are likely to react to rejection by cutting yourself off from others
    • If you perceive yourself as capable of change: experience rejection as an opportunity for future improvement or growth
    • Interventions related to self-change help to improve people’s resilience in the face of stress and reduce the likelihood of depression

    Discrimination

    • Experiencing discrimination based on disability, sexual minorities, and weight, is associated with harm to well-being
    • Weight discrimination predicts mortality

    Improving mental health

    • Regular exercise
    • Social support has shown to be beneficial for people with PTSD
    • Joining groups can foster social connectedness and help prevent depression
    • Practicing self-forgiveness

    Is the legal system fair?

    • Understand potential sources of error and bias within the current system
    • Lineups used to identify criminal suspects are subject to bias if all the suspects are shown at once (simultaneous lineup)
    • In legal proceedings, defendants’ race, gender, physical attractiveness, and socioeconomic status can influence jurors’ perceptions and judgments

    Happiness: often referred to as subjective well-being with four basic components:

    • global life satisfaction
    • satisfaction with specific life domains
    • a high level of positive feelings
    • a minimum of negative feelings

     

    Several factors consistently account for a nations’ average happiness levels:

    • degree of social support
    • per capita income
    • healthy life expectancy
    • freedom to make life choices
    • generosity toward others
    • amount of violence
    • degree of corruption

    On being happy:

    • Happy people are more community-oriented than unhappy people
    • Monetary wealth beyond a certain point does not necessarily increase happiness
    • The optimum level of well-being theory: very high levels of happiness can foster complacency or lead to unjustified overoptimism
    • Growing evidence supports the idea that happiness levels are fundamentally changeable
    • Many of the characteristics needed to be a successful entrepreneur are the same ones that contribute to happiness levels
      • Self-determination theory: entrepreneurs typically have strong intrinsic motivation

     

     

    References:

    Baron, R., & Branscombe, N. (2016). Social psychology (14th edition)

    .....read more
    Access: 
    Public
    Science of Happiness articles

    Science of Happiness articles

    Article summary with Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being - Diener, E. et al.

    What is this article about?

    The hedonic treadmill model is a model that supposes that good and bad events can only temporarily affect happiness. According to this model, everyone always adapts back to hedonic neutrality. This leads to the conclusion that it is pointless to try and increase happiness. The poorest diseased beggar with no social connections could be just as happy as the healthy billionaire with a lot of close and supportive relationships. But is this really true? This article will make five important revisions to the hedonic treadmill model:

    1. Individuals' set points are not hedonically neutral.
    2. People have different set points, partly depending on their temperaments.
    3. A single person may have multiple happiness set points.
    4. Well-being set points can change under some conditions.
    5. Individuals differ in their adaptation to events.

     

    What is the hedonic treadmill theory?

    In 1971, Brickman and Campbell came up with the hedonic treadmill. According to them, processes similar to sensory adaptation occur when people experience emotional reactions to life events. Just like we get used to sensory input and are quickly not aware anymore of smells or sounds, we adapt to emotions as well. Myers added to this theory that every desirable experience is transitory. According to the original treadmill theory of Brickman and Campbell, people briefly react to good and bad events, but in a short time they return to neutrality. The theory is based on the automatic habituation model in which psychological systems react to deviations from one's current adaptation level. Automatic habituation processes are adaptive because they allow constant stimuli to fade into the background.

    In 1978, Brickman, Coates, and Janoff-Bulman offered initial empirical support for the treadmill model. Brickman had for example studied lottery winners and found that they were not happier than nonwinners. It was also found that people with paraplegia, an impairment in the motor and sensory function of the lower body, were not less happy than people who could walk. The idea of hedonic adaptation was appealing in psychology because it offered an explanation for the observation that people appear to be relatively stable in happiness despite changes in fortune. The theory was widely accepted in psychology. Evidence frequently supported the idea. There soon came longitudinal studies that tracked changes in happiness over time. These studies provided more direct evidence that adaptation can occur. For instance, Silver found that people with spinal cord injuries had strong negative emotions after their crippling accident, but that these negative emotions had already faded after two months. 

     

    What revisions can be made to the original hedonic treadmill model?

    Are set points always neutral? 

    The first revision that can be made, is that set points might not always be neutral. The original treadmill theory suggested that people return to a neutral set point after an emotionally significant event. Research now shows that this part of the theory is wrong. Most

    .....read more
    Access: 
    Private
    Science of Happiness EN artikelen
    Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life - Baumeister e.a. - Article

    Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life - Baumeister e.a. - Article

    What is this article about?

    Two of the most widely held goals by which people measure and motivate themselves are happiness and a meaningful life. In this article, the relationship between these two goals is discussed. More specifically, although there certainly is (much) overlap between these two, the focus here is on the differences.

    How can happiness be defined?

    Happiness generally refers to a state of subjective well-being. Happiness be may narrowly or broadly focused: one can be happy to have found a lost key, but one can also be happy that the war has ended. Happiness is conceptualized and measured by researcher in at least two different manners. The first one concerns affect balance, which suggests that happiness is an aggregate of how one feels at different moment. Happiness is then defined as having more pleasant than unpleasant emotional states. The second one concerns life satisfaction, which goes beyond momentary feelings. It refers to an integrative, evaluative assessment of one's entire life. Generally, assessing both of these provides a useful index of subjective well-being.

    How can a meaningful life be defined?

    Meaningfulness is considered to concern both a cognitive and emotional assessment of whether one's life has purpose and value.

    What is the central theorem of the theory that is being proposed in this article?

    The authors suggest that the simpler form of happiness (affect balance instead of life satisfaction), at least, is rooted in nature. Every living creature has biological needs, such as wanting to survive and reproduce. Basic motivations make one to pursue and enjoy those needs. Affect balance then depends to a certain degree on whether these basic needs are being satisfied.

    While happiness is natural, meaningfulness may depend on culture. In every culture language is being used as a means to use and communicate meanings. Meaningfulness, thus, makes use of culturally transmitted symbols (via language) as a means to evaluate one's life in relation to purposes, values, and other meanings that are also frequently learned from the culture. Thus, meaning is more associated with one's culture than happiness is. An important feature of meaning is that it is not limited to immediately present stimuli (as happiness is). Instead, meaningfulness refers to thoughts about past, future, and spatially

    .....read more
    Access: 
    Public
    Study Guide with article summaries for Science of Happiness at the University of Utrecht

    Study Guide with article summaries for Science of Happiness at the University of Utrecht

    Article summaries with Science of Happiness at the University of Utrecht

    Table of content

    • Revising the adaptation theory of well-being
    • Strengths and weaknesses of self-report measures of subjective well-being
    • Is the study of happiness a worthy scientific pursuit?
    • Non-traditional measures of subjective well-being and their validity
    • Concepts and components of well-being
    • What are the possibility, desirability, and justifiability of happiness?
    • Three revolutions in the global history of happiness
    • What is well-being?
    • What is eudaimonia?
    • The relationship between cognitive outlooks and well-being
    • Affective forecasting and impact bias explained
    • Factors that might influence high happiness
    • The dark side of happiness
    • Increasing happiness
    • The Sustainable Happiness Model (SHM)
    • Using Positive Psychological Interventions (PPIs) to increase subjective well-being
    • Impact of the size and scope of government on human well-being
    • Well-being in metrics and policy
    • Subjective well-being and national satisfaction
    • Can and should happiness be a policy goal?
    • Including subjective well-being measures in government policies
    • The relationship between materialism and well-being
    • Affect and emotions as drivers of climate change perception and action
    • How pro-environmental behavior can both thwart and foster well-being
    • The relationship between social bonds and well-being
    • The relationship between social capital, prosocial behavior, and subjective well-being
    • Marriage, parenthood and well-being
    • The relationship between close relationships and health
    Summaries and supporting content: 
    Access: 
    Public
    Living a a more or less happy and meaningful life - Theme
    The Promise of Sustainable Happiness (summary)

    The Promise of Sustainable Happiness (summary)

    The Promise of Sustainable Happiness

    Boehm, J. K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (in press). The promise of sustainable happiness. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press

    The article suggests that, despite several barriers withholding people to increase their well-being, less happy people can successfully strive to be happier by learning a variety of effortful strategies and practicing these with determination and commitment. They use the sustainable happiness model (by Lyubomirsky, Sheldon and Schkade, 2005) as theoretical framework. According to the model, three factors contribute to an individual’s happiness level:

    • The set point

    • Life circumstances

    • Intentional activities/effortful acts that are episodic and naturally variable

    The journey to happiness has always and still is of great interest, there is empirical evidence that it even leads to positive life outcomes such as a higher income and stronger relationships. The question, however, is whether people can actually attain a level of sustainable happiness.

    To answer this question, we first we look at what happy and unhappy people are like:

    The first thing that comes to mind is the difference between their ‘objective’ circumstances that could cause a difference in their level of happiness. Some examples include: marital status, age, sex, culture, income etc. It is shown, however, that these factors do not explain the variation in people’s level of well-being.

    The article proposes that happiness and unhappiness is due to the subjective experience and construal of the world by people. They interpret their environment differently, leading the authors to explore an individual thoughts, behaviors and motivations. Happier people see the world in a more positive, and thus happiness-promoting, way. Research suggests that happy people are this way because of multiple adaptive strategies:

    Construal

    Research that involved having happy and unhappy people reflect on similar hypothetical situations / actual life events, revealed that happy people view these events as more pleasant, while unhappy people view these same events as unfavourable..

    Social comparison

    Findings suggest that people that are happy are less sensitive to feedback about another person or his or her performance (favourable and unfavourable feedback). When performing ‘better’ on a task, all participants became more confident about their skills; however when the other was better, happy people were unaffected while unhappy people were, negatively. Unhappy people seem to feel positive emotions when a peer has done worse than them, even if they both got negative feedback. When they got positive feedback but performed at a lower level than a peer, they felt negative emotions. This was the case in both individual and group settings.

    Decision-making

    When happy people make life-altering decisions, they tend to be satisfied with their possible options, and only express negative emotions when their sense of self is threatened. Conversely, unhappy people were generally unhappy withthe options offered to them. Happy and unhappy people also differ in how they make decisions in the face of many options. Research suggests that happy individuals are relatively more

    .....read more
    Access: 
    Public
    Work for WorldSupporter

    Image

    JoHo can really use your help!  Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world

    Working for JoHo as a student in Leyden

    Parttime werken voor JoHo

    Comments, Compliments & Kudos:

    Add new contribution

    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Image CAPTCHA
    Enter the characters shown in the image.
    Promotions
    vacatures

    JoHo kan jouw hulp goed gebruiken! Check hier de diverse studentenbanen die aansluiten bij je studie, je competenties verbeteren, je cv versterken en een bijdrage leveren aan een tolerantere wereld

    Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org

    Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams

    How and why would you use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?

    • For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
    • For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
    • For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
    • For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
    • For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.

    Using and finding summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter

    There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.

    1. Use the menu above every page to go to one of the main starting pages
      • Starting pages: for some fields of study and some university curricula editors have created (start) magazines where customised selections of summaries are put together to smoothen navigation. When you have found a magazine of your likings, add that page to your favorites so you can easily go to that starting point directly from your profile during future visits. Below you will find some start magazines per field of study
    2. Use the topics and taxonomy terms
      • The topics and taxonomy of the study and working fields gives you insight in the amount of summaries that are tagged by authors on specific subjects. This type of navigation can help find summaries that you could have missed when just using the search tools. Tags are organised per field of study and per study institution. Note: not all content is tagged thoroughly, so when this approach doesn't give the results you were looking for, please check the search tool as back up
    3. Check or follow your (study) organizations:
      • by checking or using your study organizations you are likely to discover all relevant study materials.
      • this option is only available trough partner organizations
    4. Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
      • by following individual users, authors  you are likely to discover more relevant study materials.
    5. Use the Search tools
      • 'Quick & Easy'- not very elegant but the fastest way to find a specific summary of a book or study assistance with a specific course or subject.
      • The search tool is also available at the bottom of most pages

    Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?

    Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance

    Field of study

    Check the related and most recent topics and summaries:
    WorldSupporter and development goals:
    Access level of this page
    • Public
    • WorldSupporters only
    • JoHo members
    • Private
    Statistics
    1766