Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>

Psychology by P. Gray and D. F., Bjorkland (eight edition) – Summary chapter 10

An analogy refers to a similarity in behaviour, function, or relationship between entities or situations that are in other respects different from each other. The prefrontal cortex is involved in analogical reasoning. Analogical reasoning uses multiple areas in the prefrontal cortex, unlike simple semantic retrieval.

Inductive reasoning or induction is the attempt to infer some new principle or proposition from observations or facts that serve as clues. It is also called hypothesis construction. It is reasoning that is founded on perceived analogies or other similarities. Inductive reasoning is prone to several biases:

  1. Availability bias
    People tend to rely too strongly on information that is readily available to us and ignore information that is less available (e.g: people tend to believe that a lot of people die from shark attacks because it gets a lot of news coverage, but this is not correct).
  2. Confirmation bias
    People tend to look for information that confirms the hypothesis, rather than look for information that disproves the hypothesis.
  3. Predictable-world bias
    People tend to believe that there are patterns in the world that do not exist (e.g: in a game of chance people that have seen a certain card a few times tend to go for another card, even though the probability is just as high, because they feel like the first card can’t come up again).

Deductive reasoning is the attempt to derive logically the consequences that must be true if certain premises are accepted as true. There is a bias in deductive reasoning. This occurs when people tend to use their knowledge rather than formal knowledge in answering deductive reasoning questions.

Insight problems are problems that are specifically designed to be unsolvable until one looks at them in a different way. These problems are generally very difficult, because their solution depends on abandoning a well-established habit of perception or thought, referred to as a mental set, and then viewing the problem in a different way. There is a mental set known as functional fixedness, in which there is a failure to see an object as having a function other than its usual one. There is a design stance in which people assume that some tools are designed for an intended function. This leads to more user-efficiency. People solve insight problems best if they take some time off from the problem, do something else and come back to it. This is known as the incubation period.

The broaden-and-build theory states that negative emotions tend to narrow one’s focus of perception and thought. The understanding of what is expected of a participant in a test is culturally dependent. People from non-western cultures are also more likely to sort things by function instead of taxonomy. In cultures such as China and Japan, the reasoning is more holistic and less individually centred.

In the early ages of intelligence testing, the testing of intelligence was focussed on schoolwork, rather than other intelligence-related concepts, such as abstract thinking or logical reasoning. The first intelligence test commonly used in North America was the Stanford-Binet Scale. This intelligence test, tested verbal comprehension, perceptual processing, working memory and processing speed. This test gives you an IQ score as a result and the average IQ of the population is 100.

The strength of the correlation between performance on the job and IQ depends on the type of job. There is a positive correlation, but the correlation gets stronger with more demanding jobs.

The positive manifold holds that scores always correlate positively with one another if the sample Is large enough when giving different mental tests to people who are part of the same broad cultural group. General intelligence (g) is the underlying ability that contributes to a person’s performance on all mental tests. General intelligence is usually measured by getting the average of several mental tests, which is done in most IQ tests nowadays.

Cattell argued that general intelligence consists of two parts that correlate positively with each other:

  1. Fluid intelligence
    This is the ability to perceive relationships among stimuli independently of all previous specific practise or instruction concerning those relationships (e.g: finishing a pattern of not previous seen symbols). Tests in this category depend on ‘raw reasoning’.
  2. Crystallized intelligence
    This is the mental ability derived directly from previous experiences (e.g: a test of knowledge). Tests in this category depend on previously learned information.

There is a positive correlation between general intelligence and mental speed, the inspect time that is required to detect certain patterns. The working-memory span also positively correlates with general intelligence. People with higher general intelligence perform better on executive function tasks. It is possible that general intelligence has been selected during human evolution because it helps us deal with novel problems.

Heritability is the degree to which variation in a particular trait, within a particular population of individuals, stems from genetic differences as opposed to the environmental differences. This is often quantified by the heritability coefficient. It does not say anything about how much of any trait is due to genetic factors, only what percentage of the difference in a trait within a specific population can be attributed to inheritance. Heritability is relative, varying with the environmental conditions in which people within the population live.

Heritability=r identical twins-r nonidenticaltwins*2

When the heritability is 1.0, it means that the environment for everyone in the population is the same and the differences in the population are fully caused by differences in genes. If the heritability is 0.0, it means that the genes are exactly the same for everyone and all the differences are caused by differences in the environment.

The influences of families on intelligence exists, but this effect disappears in early adulthood because by then the individuals choose their own environment.

If there are two wheat fields, each planted from the same package of genetically diverse wheat seeds, but with different soils, then there will be big differences between the wheat fields, but the differences within a wheat field are determined by genes and not the differences between the wheat fields.

There is a difference in IQ scores in the United States between blacks and whites, because of the social designation of black and white. Besides that, there is a stereotype threat. Stereotypes of a race influence the results on an IQ test.

Involuntary or castelike minorities on average score lower on IQ scores, because they are treated differently by society, than voluntary minorities. The Flynn-effect is the effect that the average IQ rises 9 to 15 points every 30 years. This effect could occur because of the improvements in modern life. More people receive education, more people have intellectual demanding jobs and modern technology is also increasingly intellectually demanding.

Image

Access: 
Public

Image

This content is used in:

Summary of Psychology by Gray and Bjorkland - 8th edition

Introduction to Psychology – Interim exam 2 [UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM]

Search a summary

Image

 

 

Contributions: posts

Help other WorldSupporters with additions, improvements and tips

Add new contribution

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Image

Spotlight: topics

Check the related and most recent topics and summaries:
Institutions, jobs and organizations:
Activity abroad, study field of working area:
This content is also used in .....

Image

Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org

Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams

How and why use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?

  • For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
  • For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
  • For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
  • For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
  • For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.

Using and finding summaries, notes and practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter

There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.

  1. Use the summaries home pages for your study or field of study
  2. Use the check and search pages for summaries and study aids by field of study, subject or faculty
  3. Use and follow your (study) organization
    • by using your own student organization as a starting point, and continuing to follow it, easily discover which study materials are relevant to you
    • this option is only available through partner organizations
  4. Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
  5. Use the menu above each page to go to the main theme pages for summaries
    • Theme pages can be found for international studies as well as Dutch studies

Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?

Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance

Main summaries home pages:

Main study fields:

Main study fields NL:

Follow the author: JesperN
Work for WorldSupporter

Image

JoHo can really use your help!  Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world

Working for JoHo as a student in Leyden

Parttime werken voor JoHo

Statistics
2288 1